Bilingualism modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 66, Issue , 2015, Pages 157-169

  Morales, Julia ^a   Yudes, Carolina ^a   Gómez Ariza, Carlos J ^b   Bajo, M Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

AX CPT; Inhibition; Monitoring; N2.; P3

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BILINGUALISM; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; MONOLINGUALISM; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MULTILINGUALISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84912054416     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Abutalebi J., Della Rosa P.A., Green D.W., Hernández M., Scifo P., Keim R., Costa A. Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22:2076-2086.
2. Abutalebi J., Green D.W. Bilingual language production: the neurocognition of language representation and control. J. Neurolinguistics 2007, 20:242-275.
3. Abutalebi J., Green D.W. Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: neural evidence from language switching studies. Lang. Cognit. Processes 2008, 23:557-582.
4. Barch D.M., Braver T.S., Akbudak E., Conturo T., Ollinger J., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11:837-848.
5. Band G.P.H., van Boxtel G.J. Inhibitory control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol. 1999, 101:179-211.
6. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2001-2013.
7. Beste C., Domschke K., Radenz B., Falkenstein M., Konrad C. The functional 5-HT1A receptor polymorphism affects response inhibition processes in a context-dependent manner. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2664-2672.
8. Beste C., Saft C., Andrich J., Gold R., Falkenstein M. Stimulus-response compatibility in Huntington's disease: a cognitive-neurophysiological analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 99:1213-1223.
9. Beste C., Willemssen R., Saft C., Falkenstein M. Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:366-373.
10. Bialystok E. Bilingualism in Development 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK). 10.1017/CBO9780511605963.
11. Bialystok E. Coordination of executive functions in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of experimental child psychology 2011, 110:461-468.
12. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Grady C., Chau W., Ishii R., Gunji A., Pantev C. Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. NeuroImage 2005, 24:40-49.
13. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Green D.W., Gollan T.H. Bilingual minds. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2009, 10:89-129.
14. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Klein R.M., Viswanathan M. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychol. Aging 2004, 19:290-303.
15. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Luk G. Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2012, 16:240-250.
16. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Ruocco A.C. Dual-modality monitoring in a classification task: the effects of bilingualism and ageing. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2006, 59:1968-1983.
17. Bialystok E., Depape A.-M. Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2009, 35:565-574.
18. Bialystok E., Martin M.M. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Dev. Sci. 2004, 7:325-339.
19. Blumenfeld H.K., Marian V. Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition 2011, 118:245-257.
20. Blumenfeld H.K., Marian V. Cognitive control in bilinguals: advantages in stimulus-stimulus inhibition. Biling.: Lang. Cognit. 2013, 1-20.
21. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2004, 8:539-546.
22. Braver T.S. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2012, 16:106-113.
23. Braver T.S., Barch D.M. A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neurosci. Biobeh. Rev. 2002, 26:809-817.
24. Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Gray J.R., Molfese D.L., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11:825-836.
25. Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Keys B.A., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D., Kaye J.A., Reed B.R. Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2001, 130:746-763.
26. Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Cohen J.D. The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Normal and Disordered Cognitive Control: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function 2002, 428-447. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.T. Stuss, R.T. Knight (Eds.).
27. Braver T.S., Gray J.R., Burgess G.C. Explaining the Many Varieties of Working Memory Variation: Dual mechanisms of Cognitive Control 2007, 76-106. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. A.R.A. Conway, C. Jarrold, A. Kane, A. Miyake, J.N. Towse (Eds.).
28. Braver T.S., Paxton J.L., Locke H.S., Barch D.M. Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:7351-7356.
29. Braver T.S., Satpute A.B., Rush B.K., Racine C.a, Barch D.M. Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Psychol. Aging 2005, 20:33-46.
30. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:1172-1182.
31. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the on line monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 747-749.
32. Colzato L.S., Bajo M.T., van den Wildenberg W., Paolieri D., Nieuwenhuis S., La Heij W., Hommel B. How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., Memory Cognit. 2008, 34:302-312.
33. Costa A., Hernández M., Costa-Faidella J., Sebastián-Gallés N. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't. Cognition 2009, 113:135-149.
34. Costa A., Hernández M., Sebastián-Gallés N. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 2008, 106:59-86.
35. Costa A., La Heij W., Navarrete E. The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism 2006, 9:137-151.
36. Costa A., Santesteban M., Ivanova I. How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 2006, 32:1057-1074.
37. De Groot A.M.B., Christoffels I.K. Language control in bilinguals: monolingual tasks and simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism 2006, 9:189-201.
38. Dias E.C., Foxe J.J., Javitt D.C. Changing plans: a high density electrical mapping study of cortical control. Cerebral cortex 2003, 13:701-715.
39. Dijkstra T., van Heuven W.J.B. The BIA Model and Bilingual Word Recognition. Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition 1998, 189-225. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Grainger, A.M. Jacobs (Eds.).
40. Dijkstra T., van Heuven W.J.B. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: from identification to decision. Biling. Lang. Cognit. 2002, 5:175-197.
41. Donkers F.C.L., Nieuwenhuis S., van Boxtel G.J. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. Cognit. Brain Res. 2005, 25:777-787.
42. Donkers F.C.L., van Boxtel G.J. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cognit. 2004, 56:165-176.
43. Edwards B.G., Barch D.M., Braver T.S. Improving prefrontal cortex function in schizophrenia through focused training of cognitive control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:32.
44. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/no-go task. Biol. Psychol. 1993, 35:123-138.
45. Falkenstein M. Inhibition, conflict and the Nogo-N2. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:1638-1640.
46. Falkenstein M., Hohnsbein J., Hoormann J., Blanke L. Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1991, 78:447-455.
47. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Christ S., Hohnsbein J. ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol. Psychol. 2000, 51:87-107.
48. Fernandez M., Tartar J.L., Padron D., Acosta J. Neurophysiological marker of inhibition distinguishes language groups on a non-linguistic executive function test. Brain Cognit. 2013, 83:330-336.
49. Festman J., Münte T.F. Cognitive control in Russian-german bilinguals. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:115.
50. Finkbeiner M., Almeida J., Janssen N., Caramazza A. Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 2006, 32:1075-1089.
51. Finkbeiner M., Gollan T.H., Caramazza A. Lexical access in bilingual speakers: 'what's the (hard) problem?. Bilingualism 2006, 9:153-166.
52. Folstein J.R., van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
53. Garavan H., Hester R., Murphy K., Fassbender C., Kelly C. Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control. Brain Res. 2006, 1105:130-142.
54. Garbin G., Sanjuan A., Forn C., Bustamante J.C., Rodriguez-Pujadas A., Belloch V., Avila C. Bridging language and attention: brain basis of the impact of bilingualism on cognitive control. NeuroImage 2010, 53:1272-1278.
55. Gehring W.J., Goss B., Coles M.G., Meyer D.E., Donchin E. A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol. Sci. 1993, 4:385-390.
56. Gratton G., Bosco C., Kramer A.F., Coles M.G., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 75:419-432.
57. Green D.W. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Biling.: Lang. Cognit. 1998, 1:67-81.
58. Green D.W., Abutalebi J. Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2013, 25:515-530.
59. Guo T., Liu H., Misra M., Kroll J.F. Local and global inhibition in bilingual word production: fMRI evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. NeuroImage 2011, 56:2300-2309.
60. Habib M., Besson M. What do music training and musical experience teach us about brain plasticity?. Music Percept. 2009, 26:279-286.
61. Hämmerer D., Li S.-C., Müller V., Lindenberger U. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3305-3316.
62. Hernández M., Martin C.D., Barceló F., Costa A. Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching?. J. Memory Lang. 2013, 69:257-276.
63. Hilchey M.D., Klein R.M. Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2011, 18:625-658.
64. Hommel B., Colzato L.S., Fischer R., Christoffels I.K. Bilingualism and creativity: benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:273.
65. Huster R.J., Westerhausen R., Pantev C., Konrad C. The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task. Hum. Brain Map. 2010, 31:1260-1271.
66. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 82:477-482.
67. Jonkman L.M. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Res. 2006, 1097:181-193.
68. Jonkman L.M., Lansbergen M., Stauder J.E.A. Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:752-761.
69. Kam J.W.Y., Dominelli R., Carlson S.R. Differential relationships between sub-traits of BIS-11 impulsivity and executive processes: an ERP study. Int. J. Psychophysiol.: Off. J. Int. Organ. Psychophysiol. 2012, 85:174-187.
70. Kan I.P., Thompson-Schill S.L. Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience 2004, 4:466-482.
71. Kharkhurin A.V. Bilingual verbal and nonverbal creative behavior. Int. J. Biling. 2010, 14:211-226.
72. Kousaie S., Phillips N.A. Conflict monitoring and resolution: are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 2012, 1446:71-90.
73. Kroll J.F., Bialystok E. Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2013, 25:497-514.
74. Kroll J.F., Bobb S.C., Wodniecka Z. Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism 2006, 9:119-135.
75. Lee Salvatierra J., Rosselli M. The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. Int. J. Biling. 2010, 15:26-37.
76. Lenartowicz A., Escobedo-Quiroz R., Cohen J.D. Updating of context in working memory: an event-related potential study. Cognit., Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2010, 10:298-315.
77. Li P., Sepanski S., Zhao X. Language history questionnaire: a Web-based interface for bilingual research. Behav. Res. Methods 2006, 38:202-210.
78. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol. Rev. 1984, 91:295-327.
79. Lorsbach T.C., Reimer J.F. Developmental differences in cognitive control: goal representation and maintenance during a continuous performance task. J. Cognit. Dev. 2010, 11:185-216.
80. Luk G., Anderson J.a E., Craik F.I.M., Grady C., Bialystok E. Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain Cognit. 2010, 74:347-357.
81. Luk G., Green D.W., Abutalebi J., Grady C. Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Lang. Cognit. Process. 2012, 27:1479-1488.
82. Luo L., Craik F.I.M., Moreno S., Bialystok E. Bilingualism interacts with domain in a working memory task: evidence from aging. Psychol. Aging 2013, 28:28-34.
83. Marzecová A., Bukowski M., Correa Á, Boros M., Lupiáñez J., Wodniecka Z. Tracing the bilingual advantage in cognitive control: the role of flexibility in temporal preparation and category switching. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2013, 25:586-604.
84. Martin-Rhee M.M., Bialystok E. The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Biling.: Lang. Cognit. 2008, 11:81-93.
85. Mathalon D.H., Bennett A., Askari N., Gray E.M., Rosenbloom M.J., Ford J.M. Response-monitoring dysfunction in aging and 'Alzheimer's disease: an event-related potential study. Neurobiol. Aging 2003, 24:675-685.
86. Morales J., Gómez-Ariza C., Bajo M. Dual mechanisms of cognitive control in bilinguals and monolinguals. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2013, 25:531-546.
87. Moreno, E.M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. 2008. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in the study of bilingual language processing. Vol. 21. pp. 477-508.
88. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognit., Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3:17-26.
89. Okazaki S., Hosokawa M., Kawakubo Y., Ozaki H., Maekawa H., Futakami S. Developmental change of neurocognitive motor behaviour in a continuous performance test with different interstimulus intervals. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:1102-1113.
90. Paap K.R., Greenberg Z.I. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognit. Psychol. 2013, 66:232-258.
91. Paxton J.L., Barch D.M., Racine C.A., Braver T.S. Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:1010-1028.
92. Paxton J.L., Barch D.M., Storandt M., Braver T.S. Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults' use of context. Psychol. Aging 2006, 21:499.
93. Philipp A.M., Gade M., Koch I. Inhibitory processes in language switching: evidence from switching language-defined response sets. Eur. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2007, 19:395-416.
94. Polich J. Overview of P3a and P3b. Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings 2003, 83-98. Kluwer, Boston, MA. J. Polich (Ed.).
95. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
96. Prior A. Too much of a good thing: stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs. Cognition 2012, 125:1-12.
97. Prior A., Gollan T.H. Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2011, 17:682-691.
98. Prior A., Macwhinney B. A bilingual advantage in task switching. Biling.: Lang. Cognit. 2010, 13:253.
99. Raven J.C., Court J.H., Raven J.E. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales 1988, Lewis, London.
100. Ricciardelli L.a Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 1992, 21:301-316.
101. Roche R.A., Garavan H., Foxe J.J., O'Mara S.M. Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 160:60-70.
102. Rodriguez-Fornells A., De Diego Balaguer R., Münte T.F. Executive control in bilingual language processing. Lang. Learn. 2006, 56:133-190.
103. Rodriguez-Fornells A., Krämer U.M., Lorenzo-Seva U., Festman J., Münte T.F. Self-assessment of individual differences in language switching. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:388.
104. Rosvold H.E., Mirsky A.F., Sarason I., Bransome E.D., Beck L.H. A continuous performance test of brain damage. J. Consult. Psychol. 1956, 20:343-350.
105. Ruchkin D.S., Canoune H.L., Johnson R., Ritter W. Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:399-410.
106. Schellenberg G., Moreno S. Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:511-514.
107. Schmajuk M., Liotti M., Busse L., Woldorff M.G. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:384-395.
108. Schneider E., Zuccoloto A. E-prime 2.0 [Computer software] 2007, Psychological Software Tools, Pittsburg. PA.
109. Schupp H.T., Lutzenberger W., Rau H., Birbaumer N. Positive shifts of event-related potentials: a state of cortical disfacilitation as reflected by the startle reflex probe. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 90:135-144.
110. Smid H.G.O.M., de Witte M.R., Homminga I., van den Bosch R.J. Sustained and transient attention in the continuous performance task. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2006, 28:859-883.
111. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:704-714.
112. Tao L., Marzecová A., Taft M., Asanowicz D., Wodniecka Z. The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:123.
113. Tse C.-S., Altarriba J. The effects of first- and second-language proficiency on conflict resolution and goal maintenance in bilinguals: evidence from reaction time distributional analyses in a Stroop task. Biling.: Lang. Cognit. 2012, 15:663-676.
114. Turner M.L., Engle R.W. Is working memory capacity task dependent?. J. Memory Lang. 1989, 28:127-154.
115. Van Heuven W.J.B., Schriefers H., Dijkstra T., Hagoort P. Language conflict in the bilingual brain. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2706-2716.
116. Van Veen V., Carter C.S. The anterior cingulate cortex as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 77:477-482.
117. Van Veen V., Carter C.S. The timing of actionmonitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2002, 14:593-602.
118. Van Wouwe N.C., Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R. Positive affect modulates flexibility and evaluative control. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2011, 23:524-539.
119. Watanabe J., Sugiura M., Sato K., Sato Y., Maeda Y., Matsue Y., Kawashima R. The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in No-Go performances: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1207-1216.
120. Wright M.J., Geffen G.M., Geffen L.B. Event-related potentials associated with covert orientation of visual attention in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:1283-1297.
121. Yeung N., Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 111:931-959.
122. Yeung N., Cohen J.D. The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:164-171.
123. Zied K.M., Phillipe A., Pinon K., Havet-Thomassin V., Aubin G., Roy A., Le Gall D. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: evidence from a bilingual stroop task. Brain Cognit. 2004, 54:254-256.