Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 704-714

  Smith, Janette L ^a,b   Johnstone, Stuart J ^b   Barry, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Movement related potentials; N2; NoGo; P3

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOPOGRAPHY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 39049133820     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.042     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R., and van der Molen M.W. Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition. Psychol Res 67 (2003) 266-279
2. Barrett G., Neshige R., and Shibasaki H. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66 (1987) 409-419
3. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Koeksma M.R., Talsma D., and Verbaten M.N. The pure electrophysiology of stopping. Int J Psychophysiol 55 (2005) 191-198
4. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., and Verbaten M.N. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task. Clin Neurophysiol 115 (2004) 2001-2013
5. Bokura K., Yamaguchi S., and Kobayashi S. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 2224-2232
6. Bruin K.J., and Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (2002) 1172-1182
7. Burle B., Vidal F., and Bonnet M. Electroencephalographic nogo potentials in a no-movement context: the case of motor imagery in humans. Neurosci Lett 360 (2004) 77-80
8. Casey B.J., Castellanos F.X., Giedd J.N., Marsh W.L., Hamburger S.D., Schubert A.B., et al. Implication of right frontostraital circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36 (1997) 374-383
9. De Jong R., Coles M.G.H., Logan G.D., and Gratton G. In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16 (1990) 164-182
10. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?. Brain Cogn 62 (2006) 98-112
11. Dimoska A., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J., and Clarke A.R. Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychiat 54 (2003) 1340-1349
12. Donchin E., Tueting P., Ritter W., Kutas M., and Heffley E.F. On the independence of the CNV and the P300 components of the human averaged evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38 (1975) 449-461
13. Donkers F.C.L., and Van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cogn 56 (2004) 165-176
14. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 101 (1999) 267-291
15. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. J Psychophysiol 16 (2002) 167-175
16. Falkenstein M., Koshlykova N.A., Kiroj V.N., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol: Evok Potent 96 (1995) 36-43
17. Hatta A., Nishihira Y., Shimoda M., Fumoto M., Ikeda H., and Takemiya T. The change of event-related potentials with choice task. Jpn J Phys Fit Sports Med 46 (1997) 405-414
18. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology (1997), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
19. Jodo E., and Inoue K. Effects of practice on the P300 in a Go/NoGo task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76 (1990) 249-257
20. Jodo E., and Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82 (1992) 477-482
21. Kaiser S., Weiss O., Hill H., Markela-Lerenc J., Kiefer M., and Weisbrod M. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task. Int J Psychophysiol 61 (2006) 279-282
22. Karlin L., Martz M.J., and Mordkoff A.M. Motor performance and sensory-evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 28 (1970) 307-313
23. Kiefer M., Marzinzik F., Weisbrod M., Scherg M., and Spitzer M. The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/nogo task. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 765-770
24. Kok A. Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol 23 (1986) 21-38
25. Kok A., Ramautar J.R., De Ruiters M.B., Band G.P.H., and Ridderinkhof K.R. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 9-20
26. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62 (1985) 203-208
27. Nakata H., Inui K., Nishihira Y., Hatta A., Sakamoto M., Kida T., et al. Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115 (2004) 361-368
28. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., and Cohen J.D. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 157-160
29. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3 (2003) 17-26
30. Oddy B.W., Barry R.J., Johnstone S.J., and Clarke A.R. Removal of CNV effects from the N2 and P3 ERP components in a visual Go/NoGo task. J Psychophysiol 19 (2005) 24-34
31. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Weller B.J., and Kopell B.S. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60 (1985) 423-434
32. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 127-152
33. Polich J. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol 25 (1987) 61-71
34. Ramautar J.R., Kok A., and Ridderinkhof K.R. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain Cogn 56 (2004) 234-252
35. Roberts L.E., Rau H., Lutzenberger W., and Birbaumer N. Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92 (1994) 44-55
36. Rubia K., Russell T., Overmeyer S., Brammer M.J., Bullmore E.T., Sharma T., et al. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of Go/No-Go and Stop tasks. Neuroimage 13 (2001) 250-261
37. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Brammer M.J., and Taylor E. Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection. Neuroimage 20 (2003) 351-358
38. Salisbury D.F., Griggs C.B., Shenton M.E., and McCarley R.W. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 115 (2004) 1550-1558
39. Salisbury D.F., Rutherford B., Shenton M.E., and McCarley R.W. Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 1676-1684
40. Schmajuk M., Liotti M., Busse L., and Woldorff M.G. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 384-395
41. Schröger E. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli following transient shifts of spatial attention in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 36 (1993) 183-207
42. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., and Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43 (1977) 864-875
43. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 115 (2004) 1320-1331
44. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol 61 (2006) 121-133
45. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (2007) 343-355
46. Starr A., Sandroni P., and Michalewski H.J. Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96 (1995) 76-92
47. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics (1996), HarperCollins, New York
48. van Boxtel G.J.M., van der Molen M.W., Jennings J.R., and Brunia C.H.M. A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychol 58 (2001) 229-262
49. Van't Ent D., and Apkarian P. Motoric response inhibition in finger movement and saccadic eye movement: a comparative study. Clin Neurophysiol 110 (1999) 1058-1072
50. Verleger R., Paehge T., Kolev V., Yordanova J., and Jaskowski P. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biol Psychol 73 (2006) 298-313
51. Wang Y., Tian S., Wang H., Cui L., and Zhang Y. Event-related potentials in a no-go task involving response-tendency conflict. Clin Electroencephalogr 33 (2002) 82-85