Neurophysiological marker of inhibition distinguishes language groups on a non-linguistic executive function test

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 330-336

  Fernandez, M ^a   Tartar, J L ^a   Padron, D ^a   Acosta, J ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related brain potentials; Executive function; Inhibitory control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; BEHAVIOR; BILINGUALISM; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; MONOLINGUALISM; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RIGHT HANDEDNESS;

EVENT RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; INHIBITORY CONTROL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LANGUAGE; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886012918     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Green D.W., Gollan T.H. Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2009, 10(3):89-129.
2. Bialystok E., Martin M.M. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science 2004, 7(3):325-339.
3. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A., van Staveren A.S.J. Response priming in a Go/NoGo task: Do we have to explain the Go/NoGo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112:1660-1671.
4. Carlson S.M., Meltzoff A.N. Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science 2008, 11(2):282-298.
5. Costa A., Santesteban M. Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50(4):491-511.
6. Donkers F.C.L., van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition 2004, 56:165-176.
7. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/NoGo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:267-291.
8. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: Variations with modality, age, and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2002, 16(3):167-175.
9. Green D.W. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1998, 1:67-81.
10. Hilchey M.D., Klein R.M. Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2011, 18:625-658.
11. Jackson G.M., Swainson R., Jackson R., Cunnington S.R. ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2001, 4(2):169-178.
12. Kiefer M., Marzinzik F., Weisbrod M., Scherg M., Spitzer M. The time course of brain activation during response inhibition: Evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. NeuroReport 1998, 9:765-770.
13. Kousaie S., Phillips N.A. Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Research 2012, 1446:71-90.
14. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2005, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Luk G., Anderson J.A.E., Craik F.I.M., Grady C., Bialystok E. Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition 2010, 74:347-357.
16. Luk G., Bialystok E., Craik F.I., Grady C.L. Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(46):16808-16813.
17. Munoz-Sandoval A.F., Cummins J., Alvarado C.G., Ruef M.L. Bilingual verbal ability test: Comprehensive manual 1998, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL.
18. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulated function in a go/no-go task: Effects or response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 3(1):17-26.
19. Paap K.R., Greenberg Z.L. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 2013, 66:232-258.
20. Polich J. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2128-2148.
21. Rosselli M., Ardila A., Santisi M.N., Arecco M.D., Salvatierra J., Conde A., et al. Stroop effect in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002, 8:819-827.
22. Swainson R., Cunnington R., Jackson G.M., Rorden C., Peters A.M., Morris P.G., et al. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(6):785-799.
23. Thomas S.J., Gonsalvez C.J., Johnstone S.J. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: Inhibition and facilitation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 74:209-219.
24. Vega C., Fernandez M. Errors on the WCST correlate with language proficiency scores in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2010, 10.1093/arclin/acq097.
25. Ye Z., Zhou X. Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(8):1168-1177.
26. Zied K.M., Phillipe A., Karine P., Valerie H., Ghislaine A., Arnaud R., et al. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: Evidence from a bilingual Stroop task. Brain and Cognition 2004, 54:254-256.