Introduction to the special issue on the future of institutional and evolutionary economics

Journal of Institutional Economics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 513-540

  Hodgson, Geoffrey M ^a   Stoelhorst, J W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910014456     PISSN: 17441374     EISSN: 17441382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1744137414000393     Document Type: Article

References (174)

1. Acemoglu, D. and S. Johnson (2005), Unbundling Institutions, Journal of Political Economy, 113(5): 949-995.
2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2001), The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation, American Economic Review, 91(5): 1369-1401.
3. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2002), Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern Income Distribution, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1231-1294.
4. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2005), The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth, American Economic Review, 95(3): 546-579.
5. Alchian, A. A. (1950), Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory, Journal of Political Economy, 58(2): 211-222.
6. Aldrich, H. E., G. M. Hodgson, D. L. Hull, T. Knudsen, J. Mokyr, and V. J. Vanberg (2008), In Defence of Generalized Darwinism, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5): 577-596.
7. Amable, B. (2000), Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production, Review of International Political Economy, 7(4): 645-687.
8. Arthur, W. B. (2006), Out-of-Equilibrium Economics and Agent-Based Modeling, in Kenneth L. Judd, L. Tesfatsion, Michael D. Intrigilator, and Kenneth J. Arrow (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, pp. 1551-1564.
9. Ayres, C. E. (1944), The Theory of Economic Progress, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
10. Ayres, C. E. (1958), Veblens Theory of Instincts Reconsidered, in Douglas F. Dowd (ed.), Thorstein Veblen: A Critical Appraisal, Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 25-37.
11. Blaug, M. (1997), Ugly Currents in Modern Economics, Options Politiques, 18(17): 3- 8. (Extended and revised as)
12. Blaug, M. (2002), Ugly Currents in Modern Economics, U.Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics:Models, Realism and Social Construction, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
13. Blaug, M. (1998), Disturbing Currents in Modern Economics, Challenge, 41(3): 11-24.
14. Boulding, K. E. (1981), Evolutionary Economics, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Bowles, S., andH.Gintis (2011), A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson (1980), Sociobiology, Culture and Economic Theory, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1): 97-121.
17. Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Button, G. (ed.) (1993), Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology, London: Routledge.
19. Camic, C. and G. M. Hodgson (eds.) (2011), EssentialWritings of Thorstein Veblen, London: Routledge.
20. Carter, R. and G. M. Hodgson (2006), The Impact of Empirical Tests of Transaction Cost Economics on the Debate on the Nature of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 461-476.
21. Clark, J. M. (1918), Economics and Modern Psychology Parts I and II, Journal of Political Economy, 26(1-2): 1-30, 136-166.
22. Coase, R. H. (1937), The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4: 386-405.
23. Coase, R. H. (1984), The New Institutional Economics, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140: 229-231.
24. Commons, J. R. (1924), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York, NY: Macmillan.
25. Commons, J. R. (1934), Institutional Economics - Its Place in Political Economy, New York, NY: Macmillan.
26. Cooley, C. H. (1902), Human Nature and the Social Order, New York, NY: Scribners.
27. Cravens, H. (1978), The Triumph of Evolution: American Scientists and the Hereditary- Environment Controversy, 1900-1941, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28. Crawford, S. E. S. and E. Ostrom (1995), A Grammar of Institutions, American Political Science Review, 89(3): 582-600.
29. Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. Darwin, C. R. (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: Murray.
31. Dasgupta, P. (2002), Modern Economics and its Critics, in UskaliMäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-89.
32. Dawkins, R. (1983), Universal Darwinism, in D. S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Man, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403-425.
33. Degler, C. N. (1991), In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Dopfer, K. (2004), The Economic Agent as Rule Maker and Rule User: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2): 177-195.
35. Dopfer, K., J. Foster, and J. Potts (2004), Micro-Meso-Macro, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3): 263-279.
36. Dorfman, J. (1955), The Role of the German Historical School in American Economic Thought, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 45(2): 17-28.
37. Dosi, G. (1982), Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change, Research Policy, 11(3): 147-162.
38. Dosi, G. (2000), Innovation, Organization and Industrial Dynamics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
39. Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. L. G. Soete (eds.) (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter.
40. Dosi, G. and L. Marengo (2000), On the Tangled Discourse between Transaction Cost Economics and Competence-Based Views of the Firm: Some Comments, inNicolai Foss, and U. Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance and Entrepreneurship, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 80-92.
41. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011), Constraints on the Evolution of Social Institutions and their Implications for Information Flow, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3): 345-371.
42. Dunn, S. P. (2011), The Economics of John Kenneth Galbraith: Introduction, Persuasion, and Rehabilitation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Earl, P. E. (2010), Economics fit for the Queen: A Pessimistic Assessment of its Prospects, Prometheus, 28(3): 209-225.
44. Eaton, B. C. (1984), Review of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change by R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, Canadian Journal of Economics, 17(4): 868-871.
45. Ebner, A. (2000), Schumpeter and the Schmollerprogramm: Integrating Theory and History in the Analysis of Economic Development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(3): 355-372.
46. Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions andOrganizations, London: Pinter.
47. Forest, J. and C. Mehier (2001), John R. Commons and Herbert Simon on the Concept of Rationality, Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3): 591-605.
48. Foss, N. J. (1993), Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2): 127-144.
49. Foss, N. J. (2001), Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Reconstruction and Relations to Contractual Theories, in Kurt Dopfer (ed.), Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 319-355.
50. Friedman, M. (1953), The Methodology of Positive Economics, in M. Friedman (ed.), Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3-43.
51. Galbraith, J. K. (1952), American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
52. Galbraith, J. K. (1958), The Affluent Society, London: Hamilton.
53. Galbraith, J. K. (1969), The New Industrial State, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
54. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Gintis, H. (2009), The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Hamilton, W. H. (1916), The Development of Hoxies Economics, Journal of Political Economy, 24(9): 855-883.
57. Hamilton, W. H. (1919), The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory, American Economic Review, 9(Supplement): 309-318.
58. Hayek, F. A. (1967), Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct, in Friedrich A. Hayek (ed.), Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 66-81.
59. Hayek, F. A. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
60. Herbst, J. (1965), The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study in the Transfer of Culture, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61. Hodgson, G. M. (1993), Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back Into Economics, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
62. Hodgson, G. M. (1994), Optimisation and Evolution: Winters Critique of Friedman Revisited, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(4): 413-430.
63. Hodgson, G. M. (1997a), The Evolutionary and Non-Darwinian Economics of Joseph Schumpeter, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7(2): 131-145.
64. Hodgson, G. M. (1997b), The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(6): 663-684.
65. Hodgson, G. M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London, UK: Routledge.
66. Hodgson, G. M. (2002), Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(2): 259-281.
67. Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routledge.
68. Hodgson, G. M. (2007), Taxonomizing the Relationship between Biology and Economics: A Very Long Engagement, Journal of Bioeconomics, 9(2): 169-185.
69. Hodgson, G. M. (2011), A Philosophical Perspective on Contemporary Evolutionary Economics, in John B. Davis, and D. Wade Hands (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Developments in Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar pp. 299-318.
70. Hodgson, G. M. (2013), From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics Without Homo Economicus, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71. Hodgson, G. M. (2014), On Fuzzy Frontiers and Fragmented Foundations: Some Reflections on the Original and New Institutional Economics, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4) doi:10.1017/S1744137414000307 (published online).
72. Hodgson, G. M. and K. Huang (2012), Evolutionary Game Theory and Evolutionary Economics: Are they Different Species?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22: 345-366.
73. Hodgson, G. M., J. J ärvinen, and J.-A. Lamberg (2013), The Structure and Evolution of Evolutionary Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature in Management, Economics, and Sociology, Paper Presented at the 25th Annual EAEPE Conference, Paris, France, 7-9 November.
74. Hodgson, G. M. and T. Knudsen (2006), Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian are Misleading, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16(4): 343-366.
75. Hodgson, G. M. and T. Knudsen (2010), Darwins Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76. Hodgson, G. M. and T. Knudsen (2012), Generalized Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics: From Ontology to Theory, Biological Theory, 2012, 6(4): 326-337.
77. Homan, P. T. (1932), An Appraisal of Institutional Economics, American Economic Review, 22(1): 10-17.
78. Hull, D. L. (1982), The Naked Meme, in Henry C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development and Culture: Essays in Evolutionary Epistemology, New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 273- 327.
79. James, W. (1890), The Principles of Psychology, Vol 1 and 2, New York, NY: Holt and Macmillan.
80. Kapp, K. W. (1950), The Social Costs of Private Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Kirman, A. P. (2007), Individual and Aggregate Behaviour: Of Ants and Men, in Geoffrey M. Hodgson (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 34-52.
82. Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science: ScienceWithout Legend, ObjectivityWithout Illusions, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
83. Klaes, M. (2001), Begriffsgeschichte: Between the Scylla of Conceptual and the Charybdis of Institutional History of Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(2): 153-179.
84. Kornai, J. (1971), Anti-Equilibrium: On Economic Systems Theory and the Tasks of Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
85. Krueger, A. O. (1991), Report on the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3): 1035-1053.
86. Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
87. Langlois, R. N. (1992), Transaction Cost Economics in Real Time, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1): 99-127.
88. Langlois, R. N. (2007), The Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm and the Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm, Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1107-1124.
89. Lipsey, R. G., Kenneth I. Carlaw, and Clifford T. Bekar (2005), Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long Term Economic Growth, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
90. Lundvall, B.-A . (ed.) (1992),National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
91. McFarland, F. B. (1985), Thorstein Veblen versus the Institutionalists, Review of Radical Political Economics, 17(4): 95-105.
92. McNulty, P. J. (1973), Hoxies Economics in Retrospect: The Making and Unmaking of a Veblenian, History of Political Economy, 5(3): 449-484.
93. Ménard, C. (2014), Embedding Organizational Arrangements: Towards a General Model, Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S1744137414000228 (published online).
94. Ménard, C. and M. M. Shirley (2014), The Future of New Institutional Economics: From Early Intuitions to a New Paradigm?, Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S174413741400006X (published online).
95. Metcalfe, J. S. (1994), Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy, Economic Journal, 104(4): 931-44.
96. Metcalfe, J. S. (1995), Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 25-46.
97. Metcalfe, J. S. (1998), Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, London, UK: Routledge.
98. Michaelides, P. G. and J. G. Milios (2009), Joseph Schumpeter and the German Historical School, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(3): 495-516.
99. Milgrom, P. R. and J. Roberts (1992), Economics, Organisation, and Management, London: Prentice-Hall.
100. Myrdal, G. (1957), Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions, London: Duckworth.
101. Myrdal, G. (1968), Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, New York, NY: Penguin.
102. Nelson, R. R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
103. Nelson, R. R. (1995), Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1): 48-90.
104. Nelson, R. R. (2005), Technology, Institutions and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105. Nelson, R. R. and K. Nelson (2002), Technology, Institutions, and Innovation Systems, Research Policy, 31(2): 265-272.
106. Nelson, R. R. and B. N. Sampat (2001), Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(1): 31-54.
107. Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1973), Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Capabilities, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 63(2): 440-449.
108. Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1974), Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus, Economic Journal, 84(4): 886-905.
109. Nelson, R. R. and S. G.Winter (1977), In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation, Research Policy, 6: 36-76.
110. Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
111. Nooteboom, B. (1992), Towards a Dynamic Theory of Transactions, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2(4): 281-299.
112. North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
113. North, D. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
114. Orlikowski, W. J. (2010), The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1): 125-141.
115. Pagano, U. (1991), Property Rights, Asset Specificity, and the Division of Labour Under Alternative Capitalist Relations, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(3): 315-342. (Reprinted in Hodgson, 1993.)
116. Pagano, U. (1992), Authority, Co-ordination and Disequilibrium: An Explanation of the Co-Existence ofMarkets and Firms, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 3(1): 53-77.
117. Pagano, U. (2011), Interlocking Complementarities and Institutional Change, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3): 373-392.
118. Pagano, U. and R. E. Rowthorn (1994), Ownership, Technology and Institutional Stability, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 221-242.
119. Parra, C. M. (2005), Rules and Knowledge, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2(1): 81-111.
120. Pelikan, P. (2011), Evolutionary Developmental Economics: How to Generalize Darwinism Fruitfully to help Comprehend Economic Change, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(2): 341-366.
121. Penrose, E. T. (1952), Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm, American Economic Review, 42(4): 804-819.
122. Pessali, H. F. (2006), The Rhetoric of Oliver Williamsons Transaction Cost Economics, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(1): 45-65.
123. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
124. Potts, J. (2000), The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
125. Ritchie, D. G. (1896), Social Evolution, International Journal of Ethics, 6(2): 165-181.
126. Rutherford,M. H. (1997), American Institutionalism and the History of Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(2): 178-195.
127. Rutherford, M. H. (1998), Veblens Evolutionary Programme: A Promise Unfulfilled, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(4): 463-477.
128. Rutherford, M. H. (2001), Institutional Economics: Then and Now, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3): 173-194.
129. Rutherford, M. H. (2011), The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918- 1947: Science and Social Control, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1918-1947.
130. Ruttan, V. W. (1997), Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change, Economic Journal, 107(5): 1520-1529.
131. Ruttan, V. W. (2006), Social Science Knowledge and Induced Institutional Innovation: An Institutional Design Perspective, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(3): 249-272.
132. Saviotti, P. P. (1996), Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
133. Saviotti, P. P. and B. Nooteboom (eds.) (2005), Technology and Knowledge: From the Firm to Innovation Systems, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
134. Schaffer, M. E. (1989), Are Profit-Maximisers the Best Survivors?: A Darwinian Model of Economic Natural Selection, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(1): 29-45.
135. Schumpeter, J. A. ([1911, 1926] 1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Redvers Opie (tr.), from the 2nd German edn., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: George Allen and Unwin.
137. Searle, J. R. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, London: Allen Lane.
138. Silva, S. T. and A. A. C. Teixeira (2009), On the Divergence of Evolutionary Research Paths in the Past 50 years: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Account, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(5): 605-642.
139. Simon, H. A. (1947), Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, New York, NY: Free Press.
140. Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York, NY: Wiley.
141. Simon, H. A. (1979), Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations, American Economic Review, 69(4): 493-513.
142. Simon, H. A. (1996), Letter to G. M. Hodgson of 26 January.
143. Stoelhorst, J. W. (2005), The Naturalist View of Universal Darwinism: An Application to the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm, in J. Finch, and M. Orillard (eds.), Complexity and the Economy: Implications for Economic Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 127-47.
144. Stoelhorst, J. W. (2008a), Why is Management Not an Evolutionary Science? Evolutionary Theory in Strategy and Organization, Journal of Management Studies, 45(5): 1008-1023.
145. Stoelhorst, J. W. (2008b), The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15(4): 343-363.
146. Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014), The Future of Evolutionary Economics Is In a Vision from the Past, Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S174413741400037X (published online).
147. Stoelhorst, J. W. and Peter J. Richerson (2013), A Naturalistic Theory of Economic Organization, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 908: S45-S56.
148. Streissler, E. W. (1994), The Influence of German and Austrian Economics on Joseph A. Schumpeter, in Yuichi Shionoya, and Mark Perlman (eds.), Schumpeter in the History of Ideas, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 13-38.
149. Teece, D. J. and G. Pisano (1994), The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
150. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
151. Tinbergen, N. (1963), On Aims and Methods in Ethology, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20: 410-433.
152. Tunzelmann, G. N. V. and Q.Wang (2003), An Evolutionary View of Dynamic Capabilities, E conomie appliqueé, 56(3): 33-64.
153. Tylecote, A. (2007), The Role of Finance and Corporate Governance in National Systems of Innovation, Organization Studies, 28(10): 1461-1481.
154. Vanberg, V. J. (2002), Rational Choice versus Program-Based Behavior: Alternative Theoretical Approaches and Their Relevance for the Study of Institutions, Rationality and Society, 14(1): 7-53.
155. Veblen, T. B. (1898a), Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(3): 373-397. (Reprinted in Camic and Hodgson, 2011).
156. Veblen, T. B. (1898b), The Instinct ofWorkmanship and the Irksomeness of Labor, American Journal of Sociology, 4(2): 187-201. (Reprinted in Camic and Hodgson, 2011).
157. Veblen, T. B. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, New York, NY: Macmillan.
158. Veblen, T. B. (1914), The Instinct ofWorkmanship, and the State of the Industrial Arts, New York, NY: Macmillan.
159. Vromen, J. J. (2001), Ontological Commitments and Evolutionary Economics, in Uskali Mäki (ed.), The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-224.
160. Waters, C. K. (1986), Natural Selection without Survival of the Fittest, Biology and Philosophy, 1(2): 207-225.
161. Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, New York, NY: Free Press.
162. Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, London: Free Press.
163. Williamson, O. E. (1996), Review of Jack Vromen Economic Evolution, Economic Journal, 106(6): 1791-1793.
164. Williamson, O. E. (2000), The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595-613.
165. Winter, S. G., Jr (1964), Economic Natural Selection and the Theory of the Firm, Yale Economic Essays, 4(1): 225-272.
166. Winter, S. G., Jr (1971), Satisficing, Selection and the Innovating Remnant, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(2): 237-261.
167. Winter, S. G., Jr (2013), Habit, Deliberation and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2): 120-137.
168. Winter, S. G., Jr (2014), The Future of Evolutionary Economics: Can We Break Out of the Beachhead?,Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S1744137414000277 (published online).
169. Witt, U. (2002), How Evolutionary is Schumpeters Theory of Economic Development?, Industry and Innovation, 9(1/2): 7-22.
170. Witt, U. (2003), The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
171. Witt, U. (2004), On the Proper Interpretations of Evolution in Economics and its Implications for Production Theory, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2): 125-146.
172. Witt, U. (2008), What is Specific About Evolutionary Economics?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18: 547-575.
173. Witt, U. (2014), The Future of Evolutionary Economics:Why theModalities of Explanations Matter, Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S1744137414000253 (published online).
174. Zuboff, S. (1988), In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future ofWork and Power, Oxford, UK: Heinemann.