On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 369, Issue 1641, 2014, Pages

  VanRullen, Rufin ^a,b   Zoefel, Benedikt ^a,b   Ilhan, Barkin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b CHU PURPAN   (France)

^c NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Brain rhythms; Discrete perception; Perceptual cycles; Perceptual sampling; Sampling rate; Speech processing

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; BRAIN; HEARING; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SAMPLING; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VISION;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN RHYTHMS; DISCRETE PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEARING; HUMAN; PERCEPTUAL CYCLES; PERCEPTUAL SAMPLING; PERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SAMPLING RATE; SPEECH PROCESSING; TIME; VISION;

BRAIN RHYTHMS; DISCRETE PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL CYCLES; PERCEPTUAL SAMPLING; SAMPLING RATE; SPEECH PROCESSING;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AWARENESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEARING; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PERIODICITY; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84909590702     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0214     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Pitts W, McCulloch WS. 1947 How we know universals: the perception of auditory and visual forms. Bull. Math. Biophys. 9, 127-147. (doi: 10. 1007/BF02478291).
2. Stroud JM. 1956 The fine structure of psychological time. In Information theory in psychology (ed. H Quastler), pp. 174-205. Chicago, IL: Free Press.
3. Harter MR. 1967 Excitability cycles and cortical scanning: a review of two hypotheses of central intermittency in perception. Psychol. Bull. 68, 47-58. (doi: 10. 1037/h0024725).
4. Allport DA. 1968 Phenomenal simutaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis. Br. J. Psychol. 59, 395-406. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8295. 1968. tb01154. x).
5. VanRullen R, Koch C. 2003 Is perception discrete or continuous? Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 207-213. (doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(03)00095-0).
6. Durgin FH, Tripathy SP, Levi DM. 1995 On the filling in of the visual blind spot: some rules of thumb. Perception 24, 827-840. (doi: 10. 1068/p240827).
7. Di Lollo V, Wilson AE. 1978 Iconic persistence and perceptual moment as determinants of temporal integration in vision. Vision Res. 18, 1607-1610. (doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989(78)90251-1).
8. Berger H. 1929 Ü ber das Elektroenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv. Psychiatr. Nervenkrankheiten 87, 527-570. (doi: 10. 1007/BF01797193).
9. Chapman RM, Shelburne Jr SA, Bragdon HR. 1970 EEG alpha activity influenced by visual input and not by eye position. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28, 183-189. (doi: 10. 1016/0013-4694(70)90186-0).
10. Schouten JF. 1967 Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In Models for the perception of speech and visual form (ed. I Wathen-Dunn), pp. 44-45. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Purves D, Paydarfar JA, Andrews TJ. 1996 The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3693-3697. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 93. 8. 3693).
12. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C. 2005 Attentiondriven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5291-5296. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0409172102).
13. Simpson WA, Shahani U, Manahilov V. 2005 Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling. Neurosci. Lett. 375, 23-27. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neulet. 2004. 10. 059).
14. Andrews T, Purves D. 2005 The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 261-263. (doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2005. 04. 004).
15. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C. 2006 The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. J. Neurosci. 26, 502-507. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4654-05. 2006).
16. Piantoni G, Kline KA, Eagleman DM. 2010 Beta oscillations correlate with the probability of perceiving rivalrous visual stimuli. J. Vis. 10, 18. (doi: 10. 1167/10. 13. 18).
17. Blake R, Logothetis NK. 2002 Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 13-21. (doi: 10. 1038/nrn701).
18. Kline K, Holcombe AO, Eagleman DM. 2004 Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Res. 44, 2653-2658. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2004. 05. 030).
19. Holcombe AO, Clifford CW, Eagleman DM, Pakarian P. 2005 Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 559-560. (doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2005. 10. 009).
20. Holcombe AO, Seizova-Cajic T. 2008 Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli. Vision Res. 48, 1743-1757. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2008. 05. 019).
21. Kline K, Eagleman DM. 2008 Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal. J. Vis. 8, 13 11-15.
22. Hutchinson CV, Ledgeway T. 2006 Sensitivity to spatial and temporal modulations of first-order and second-order motion. Vision Res. 46, 324-335. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2005. 03. 002).
23. VanRullen R. 2006 The continuous wagon wheel illusion is object-based. Vision Res. 46, 4091-4095. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2006. 07. 030).
24. Macdonald JSP, Cavanagh P, VanRullen R. 2013 Attentional sampling of multiple wagon wheels. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 46, 4091-4095.
25. Chaudhuri A. 1990 Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature 344, 60-62. (doi: 10. 1038/344060a0).
26. Rezec A, Krekelberg B, Dobkins KR. 2004 Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments. Vision Res. 44, 3035-3044. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2004. 07. 020).
27. VanRullen R. 2007 The continuous wagon wheel illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation. Vision Res. 47, 2143-2149. (doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2007. 03. 019).
28. VanRullen R, Pascual-Leone A, Battelli L. 2008 The continuous wagon wheel illusion and the 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS ONE 3, e2911. (doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0002911).
29. Reddy L, Remy F, Vayssiere N, VanRullen R. 2011 Neural correlates of the continuous wagon wheel illusion: a functional MRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 163-170. (doi: 10. 1002/hbm. 21007).
30. VanRullen R, Busch NA, Drewes J, Dubois J. 2011 Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability. Front. Percept. Sci. 2, 1-9.
31. Busch NA, Dubois J, VanRullen R. 2009 The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception. J. Neurosci. 29, 7869-7876. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 0113-09. 2009).
32. Mathewson KE, Gratton G, Fabiani M, Beck DM, Ro T. 2009 To see or not to see: prestimulus alpha phase predicts visual awareness. J. Neurosci. 29, 2725-2732. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 3963-08. 2009).
33. Busch NA, VanRullen R. 2010 Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16 048-16 053. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1004801107).
34. Dugue L, Marque P, VanRullen R. 2011 The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception. J. Neurosci. 31, 11 889-11 893. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 1161-11. 2011).
35. Drewes J, VanRullen R. 2011 This is the rhythm of your eyes: the phase of ongoing electroencephalogram oscillations modulates saccadic reaction time. J. Neurosci. 31, 4698-4708. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4795-10. 2011).
36. Dugue L, Marque P, VanRullen R. Submitted. Theta oscillations modulate attentional search performance periodically. J. Neurosci.
37. Varela FJ, Toro A, John ER, Schwartz EL. 1981 Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm. Neuropsychologia 19, 675-686. (doi: 10. 1016/0028-3932(81)90005-1).
38. Gho M, Varela FJ. 1988 A quantitative assessment of the dependency of the visual temporal frame upon the cortical rhythm. J. Physiol. 83, 95-101.
39. Chakravarthi R, VanRullen R. 2012 Conscious updating is a rhythmic process. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10 599-10 604. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1121622109).
40. Nijhawan R. 1994 Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256-257. (doi: 10. 1038/370256b0).
41. Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ. 2000 Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287, 2036-2038. (doi: 10. 1126/science. 287. 5460. 2036).
42. VanRullen R, Macdonald JSP. 2012 Perceptual echoes at 10 Hz in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 22, 995-999. (doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2012. 03. 050).
43. Lalor EC, Pearlmutter BA, Reilly RB, McDarby G, Foxe JJ. 2006 The VESPA: a method for the rapid estimation of a visual evoked potential. Neuroimage 32, 1549-1561. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2006. 05. 054).
44. Ciganek L. 1969 Variability of the human visual evoked potential: normative data. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 27, 35-42. (doi: 10. 1016/0013-4694(69)90106-0).
45. Hillyard SA, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Munte TF. 1998 Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 202-210. (doi: 10. 1016/S0959-4388(98)80141-4).
46. Townsend J. 1990 Serial vs. parallel processing: sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychol. Sci. 1, 46-54. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1990. tb00067. x).
47. Jans B, Peters JC, De Weerd P. 2010 Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. Psychol. Rev. 117, 637-684. (doi: 10. 1037/a0019082).
48. VanRullen R, Dubois J. 2011 The psychophysics of brain rhythms. Front. Psychol. 2, 203. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00203).
49. Eriksen CW, Spencer T. 1969 Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. J. Exp. Psychol. 79, 1-16. (doi: 10. 1037/h0026873).
50. Treisman A. 1969 Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol. Rev. 76, 282-299. (doi: 10. 1037/h0027242).
51. Kahneman D. 1973 Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52. VanRullen R, Carlson T, Cavanagh P. 2007 The blinking spotlight of attention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19 204-19 209. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0707316104).
53. Landau AN, Fries P. 2012 Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Curr. Biol. 22, 1000-1004. (doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2012. 03. 054).
54. Posner MI. 1994 Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7398-7403. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 91. 16. 7398).
55. Mack A, Rock I. 1998 Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Regan D. 1977 Steady-state evoked potentials. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1475-1489. (doi: 10. 1364/JOSA. 67. 001475).
57. Herrmann CS. 2001 Human EEG responses to 1-100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp. Brain Res. 137, 346-353. (doi: 10. 1007/s002210100682).
58. Rager G, Singer W. 1998 The response of cat visual cortex to flicker stimuli of variable frequency. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 1856-1877. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1460-9568. 1998. 00197. x).
59. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ. 1981 A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2643-2647. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 78. 4. 2643).
60. Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, Hamel G, Picton TW. 1984 Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear. 5, 105-113. (doi: 10. 1097/00003446-198403000-00009).
61. Greenberg S. 1998 A syllable-centric framework for the evolution of spoken language. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 518. (doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X98301260).
62. Poeppel D. 2003 The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun. 41, 245-255. (doi: 10. 1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3).
63. Ghitza O, Greenberg S. 2009 On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica 66, 113-126. (doi: 10. 1159/000208934).
64. Giraud AL, Poeppel D. 2012 Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 511-517. (doi: 10. 1038/nn. 3063).
65. Peelle JE, Davis MH. 2012 Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Front. Psychol. 3, 320. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2012. 00320).
66. Lakatos S, Shepard RN. 1997 Constraints common to apparent motion in visual, tactile, and auditory space. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 1050-1060. (doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 23. 4. 1050).
67. Feron FX, Frissen I, Boissinot J, Guastavino C. 2010 Upper limits of auditory rotational motion perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3703-3714. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 3502456).
68. Saenz M, Langers DR. 2013 Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 307, 42-52. (doi: 10. 1016/j. heares. 2013. 07. 016).
69. Shepard RN. 1964 Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 2346-2353. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 1919362).
70. Zoefel B, Heil P. 2013 Detection of near-threshold sounds is independent of EEG phase in common frequency bands. Front. Psychol. 4, 262. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2013. 00262).
71. Ng BS, Schroeder T, Kayser C. 2012 A precluding but not ensuring role of entrained low-frequency oscillations for auditory perception. J. Neurosci. 32, 12 268-12 276. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 1877-12. 2012).
72. Vanrullen R, McLelland D. 2013 What goes up must come down: EEG phase modulates auditory perception in both directions. Front. Psychol. 4, 16. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2013. 00016).
73. Henry MJ, Herrmann B. 2012 A precluding role of low-frequency oscillations for auditory perception in a continuous processing mode. J. Neurosci. 32, 17 525-17 527. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4456-12. 2012).
74. Large EW, Jones MR. 1999 The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychol. Rev. 106, 119-159. (doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 106. 1. 119).
75. Lakatos P, Karmos G, Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE. 2008 Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science 320, 110-113. (doi: 10. 1126/science. 1154735).
76. Schroeder CE, Lakatos P. 2009 Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 32, 9-18. (doi: 10. 1016/j. tins. 2008. 09. 012).
77. Henry MJ, Obleser J. 2012 Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20 095-20 100. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1213390109).
78. Luo H, Poeppel D. 2007 Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 54, 1001-1010. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2007. 06. 004).
79. Kerlin JR, Shahin AJ, Miller LM. 2010 Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a 'cocktail party'. J. Neurosci. 30, 620-628. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 3631-09. 2010).
80. Ghitza O. 2011 Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Front. Psychol. 2, 130. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00130).
81. Ghitza O. 2012 On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsing in decoding speech: intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum. Front. Psychol. 3, 238. (doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2012. 00238).
82. Ding N, Simon JZ. 2012 Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11 854-11 859. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1205381109).
83. Ding N, Simon JZ. 2013 Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech. J. Neurosci. 33, 5728-5735. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 5297-12. 2013).
84. Zion-Golumbic EM, Poeppel D, Schroeder CE. 2012 Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective. Brain Lang. 122, 151-161. (doi: 10. 1016/j. bandl. 2011. 12. 010).
85. Zion-Golumbic EM et al. 2013 Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a 'cocktail party'. Neuron 77, 980-991. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2012. 12. 037).
86. Doelling KB, Arnal LH, Ghitza O, Poeppel D. 2013 Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. Neuroimage 85, 761-768. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2013. 06. 035).
87. Peelle JE, Gross J, Davis MH. 2013 Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1378-1387. (doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhs118).
88. Llinas RR, Pare D. 1991 Of dreaming and wakefulness. Neuroscience 44, 521-535. (doi: 10. 1016/0306-4522(91)90075-Y).
89. Thorne JD, Debener S. 2013 Look now and hear what's coming: on the functional role of crossmodal phase reset. Hear. Res. 307, 144-152. (doi: 10. 1016/j. heares. 2013. 07. 002).
90. Kavanagh KT, Domico WD. 1986 High-pass digital filtration of the 40 Hz response and its relationship to the spectral content of the middle latency and 40 Hz responses. Ear Hear. 7, 93-99. (doi: 10. 1097/00003446-198604000-00007).
91. İlhan B, VanRullen R. 2012 No counterpart of visual perceptual echoes in the auditory system. PLoS ONE 7, e49287. (doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0049287).
92. Wertheimer M. 1912 Experimentelle Studien uber das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeit. Psychol. 61, 161-265.
93. van Santen JP, Sperling G. 1985 Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 300-321. (doi: 10. 1364/JOSAA. 2. 000300).
94. Kubovy M. 1988 Should we resist the seductiveness of the space: time: vision: audition analogy? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 318-320. (doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 14. 2. 318).
95. Apteker RT, Fisher JA, Kisimov VS, Neishlos H. 1995 Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia 2, 32-40. (doi: 10. 1109/93. 410510).
96. McCarthy JD, Sasse MA, Miras D. 2004 Sharp or smooth? Comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, 24-29 Apr 2004. pp. 535-542. Aarhus, Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation.
97. Miller GA, Licklider JCR. 1950 The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 167. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 1906584).
98. Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. 1995 Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270, 303-304. (doi: 10. 1126/science. 270. 5234. 303).
99. Obleser J, Eisner F, Kotz SA. 2008 Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 28, 8116-8123. (doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 1290-08. 2008).
100. Saberi K, Perrott DR. 1999 Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature 398, 760. (doi: 10. 1038/19652).
101. Stilp CE, Kiefte M, Alexander JM, Kluender KR. 2010 Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rateinvariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 2112-2126. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 3483719).
102. Drullman R, Festen JM, Plomp R. 1994 Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2670-2680. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 409836).
103. Drullman R, Festen JM, Plomp R. 1994 Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1053-1064. (doi: 10. 1121/1. 408467).
104. Joliot M, Ribary U, Llinas R. 1994 Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 11 748-11 751. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 91. 24. 11748).
105. Hirsh IJ, Sherrick CEJ. 1961 Perceived order in different sense modalities. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 423-432. (doi: 10. 1037/h0045283).
106. Poppel E. 1997 A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 56-61. (doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(97)01008-5).
107. Frisina RD. 2001 Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing. Hear. Res. 158, 1-27. (doi: 10. 1016/S0378-5955(01) 00296-9).
108. Kohler MA. 1997 A comparison of the new 2400 bps MELP Federal Standard with other standard coders. In ICASSP-97: IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Munich, Germany, 21-24 April 1997, vol. 2, pp. 1587-1590. (doi: 10. 1109/ICASSP. 1997. 596256).
109. Funke K, Kisvarday F, Volgushev M, Worgotter F. 2002 The visual cortex. In Models of neural networks IV: early vision and attention (eds JL van Hemmen, JD Cowan, E Domany), pp. 131-160. New York: Springer.
110. Nelken I, Las L, Ulanovsky N, Farkas D. 2005 Are speech, pitch, and space early or late in the auditory system? In The auditory cortex: a synthesis of human and animal research (eds R Konig, P Heil, E BudingerH Scheich). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
111. Luo H, Tian X, Song K, Zhou K, Poeppel D. 2013 Neural response phase tracks how listeners learn new acoustic representations. Curr. Biol. 23, 968-974. (doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2013. 04. 031).
112. Petkov CI, Kang X, Alho K, Bertrand O, Yund EW, Woods DL. 2004 Attentional modulation of human auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 658-663. (doi: 10. 1038/nn1256).
113. Rinne T, Stecker GC, Kang X, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Woods DL. 2007 Attention modulates sound processing in human auditory cortex but not the inferior colliculus. Neuroreport 18, 1311-1314. (doi: 10. 1097/WNR. 0b013e32826fb3bb).
114. Buffalo EA, Fries P, Landman R, Liang H, Desimone R. 2010 A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 361-365. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0907658106).
115. Lakatos P, O'Connell MN, Barczak A, Mills A, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE. 2009 The leading sense: supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention. Neuron 64, 419-430. (doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2009. 10. 014).