The continuous wagon wheel illusion and the 'When' pathway of the right parietal lobe: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  VanRullen, Rufin ^a,b   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^c,d   Battelli, Lorella ^c,e  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d University Institute affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona   (Spain)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TIME PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 51449098144     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002911     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Schouten JF (1967) Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In: Wathen-Dunn I, ed. Models for the perception of speech and visual form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp 44-45.
2. Purves D, Paydarfar JA, Andrews TJ (1996) The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 3693-3697.
3. Kline K, Holcombe AO, Eagleman DM (2004) Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Res 44: 2653-2658.
4. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C (2005) Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 5291-5296.
5. Pakarian P, Yasamy MT (2003) Wagon-wheel illusion under steady illumination: real or illusory? Perception 32: 1307-1310.
6. Kline K, Holcombe AO, Eagleman DM (2006) Illusory motion reversal does not imply discrete processing: Reply to Rojas et al. Vision Res 46: 1158-1159.
7. Holcombe AO, Clifford CW, Eagleman DM, Pakarian P (2005) Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 559-560.
8. Andrews T, Purves D (2005) The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 261-263.
9. VanRullen R (2007) The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation. Vision Res 47: 2143-2149.
10. Cavanagh P (1992) Attention-based motion perception. Science 257: 1563-1565.
11. Lu ZL, Sperling G (1995) The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Res 35: 2697-2722.
12. Lu ZL, Sperling G (2001) Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18: 2331-2370.
13. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C (2006) The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. J Neurosci 26: 502-507.
14. VanRullen R (2006) The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based. Vision Res 46: 4091-4095.
15. Andrews T, Purves D, Simpson WA, VanRullen R (2005) The wheel keeps turning: Reply to Holcombe et al. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 561.
16. Rojas D, Carmona-Fontaine C, Lopez-Calderon J, Aboitiz F (2006) Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals? Vision Res 46: 1155-1157.
17. Battelli L, Cavanagh P, Intriligator J, Tramo MJ, Henaff MA, et al. (2001) Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion. Neuron 32: 985-995.
18. Battelli L, Cavanagh P, Martini P, Barton JJ (2003) Bilateral deficits of transient visual attention in right parietal patients. Brain 126: 2164-2174.
19. Battelli L, Pascual-Leone A, Cavanagh P (2007) The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 204-210.
20. Pascual-Leone A, Tormos JM, Keenan J, Tarazona F, Canete C, et al. (1998) Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 15: 333-343.
21. Wagner T, Valero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9: 527-565.
22. Valero-Cabre A, Payne BR, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex. Exp Brain Res 176: 603-615.
23. Kleinschmidt A, Buchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc Biol Sci 265: 2427-2433.
24. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
25. Carmel D, Walsh V, Lavie N, Rees G A causal role for right parietal cortex in binocular rivalry demonstrated with TMS; 2008; Naples, Florida, USA. 790a p.
26. Bonneh YS, Pavlovskaya M, Ring H, Soroker N (2004) Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: evidence for a non-spatial mechanism of extinction. Neuroreport 15: 473-477.
27. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, et al. (2003) The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 126: 1986-1997.
28. Williams ZM, Elfar JC, Eskandar EN, Toth LJ, Assad JA (2003) Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion. Nat Neurosci 6: 616-623.
29. Husain M, Shapiro K, Martin J, Kennard C (1997) Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 385: 154-156.
30. Battelli L, Alvarez G, Carlson T, Pascual-Leone A. The role of MT and the parietal lobe in visual tracking studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation; 2006; Sarasota, Florida, USA. 822a p.
31. Mottaghy FM, Doring T, Muller-Gartner HW, Topper R, Krause BJ (2002) Bilateral parieto-frontal network for verbal working memory: an interference approach using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Eur J Neurosci 16: 1627-1632.
32. Hilgetag CC, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2001) Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4: 953-957.