Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 202-210

  Hillyard, Steven A ^a   Teder Sälejärvi, Wolfgang A ^a   Münte, Thomas F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; TIME;

EID: 0032052159     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80141-4     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Hillyard SA. Electrical and magnetic brain recordings: contributions to cognitive neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 3:1993;217-224.
2. Rugg MD, Coles MGH. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
3. LaBerge D. Attentional Processing: The Brain's Art of Mindfulness. 1995;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. Mangun GR. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;4-18.
5. Johannes S, Münte TF, Heinze HJ, Mangun GR. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Cogn Brain Res. 2:1995;189-205.
6. Anllo-Vento L, Hillyard SA. Selective attention to color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Percept Psychophys. 58:1996;191-206 ERPs were recorded as subjects attended to stimuli on the basis of location and a nonspatial feature (color or movement direction). Selection for nonspatial features was associated with a qualitatively different ERP pattern dominated by a selection negativity that was hierarchically dependent upon selection for location. These data support the hypothesis that spatial attention has a unique, early selection mechanism that controls selection of nonspatial features. of special interest.
7. Clark VP, Hillyard SA. Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. J Cogn Neurosci. 8:1996;387-402 Spatial attention was found to modulate the P1 and N1 components (80-180 ms) that were localized by dipole modelling to ventro-lateral extrastriate cortex, but not the earlier C1 component (50-80 ms) localized to primary visual cortex. The work supports an extrastriate locus of attentional gain control during attention to location. of special interest.
8. Wijers AA, Lange JJ, Mulder G, Mulder LJM. An ERP study of visual spatial attention and letter target detection for isoluminant and nonisoluminant stimuli. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;553-565 ERPs were recorded during spatial attention under conditions of high and low stimulus luminance. Luminance changes produced similar effects on P1 and N1 components to attended and unattended stimuli, supporting a mechanism of sensory gain control in extrastriate cortex. The earlier C1 component was unaffected by attention. of special interest.
9. Posner MI, Dehaene S. Attentional networks. Trends Neurosci. 17:1994;75-79.
10. Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, Luck SJ. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol]. 1998;. in press.
11. Anllo-Vento L. Shifting attention in visual space: the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. Int J Neurosci. 80:1995;353-370.
12. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Mouloua M, Woldorff MG, Clark VP, Hawkins HL. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept Perf]. 20:1994;887-904.
13. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA. Attention: mechanisms and models. Rugg MD, Coles MGH. Electrophysiology of Mind Event-Related Potentials and Cognition. 1995;40-85 Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Csibra G, Johnson MH, Tucker LA. Attention and oculomotor control: a high-density ERP study of the gap effect. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;855-865.
15. Eimer M. 'Sensory gating' as a mechanism for visual spatial orienting: electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments. Percept Psychophys. 55:1994;667-675.
16. Eimer M. Attentional selection and attentional gradients: an alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;365-376.
17. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. Int J Neurosci. 80:1995;281-297.
18. Gomez GM, Clark VP, Fan S, Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr. 7:1994;41-51.
19. Clark VP, Fan S, Hillyard SA. Identification of early visually evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum Brain Map. 2:1995;170-187.
20. Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Burchert W, Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Münte TF, Gös A, Scherg M, Johannes S, Hundeshagen H, et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in human. Nature. 372:1994;543-546.
21. Mangun GR, Hopfinger J, Kussmaul CL, Fletchert E, Heinze HJ. Covariations in ERP and PET measures of spatial selective attention in human extrastriate visual cortex. Hum Brain Map. 5:1997;273-279 Combined recordings of ERPs and PET during spatial attention confirmed previous findings of Heinze et al. [20] that visual processing is facilitated in the fusiform gyrus of the hemisphere contralateral to the attended nemifield. Covariance of the amplitude of the attention-sensitive P1 component (80-130 ms) and fusiform gyrus blood flow as a function of task difficulty supported a common neural origin for these electrophysiological and PET indices of attention. A secondary focus of increased cerebral blood flow was seen in ventro-lateral extrastriate cortex of the middle occipital gyrus. of outstanding interest.
22. Woldorff MG, Fox PT, Matzke M, Lancaster JL, Veeraswamy S, Zamarripa F, Seabolt M, Glass T, Gao JH, Martin CC, Jerabek P. Retinotopic organization of the early visual-spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs. Hum Brain Map. 5:1997;280-286 Combined recordings of ERPs and PET during spatial attention suggested that the amplification of visual evoked activity reflected in the P1 component takes place in retinotopically organized extrastriate visual cortex. Unlike the studies of Heinze et al. [20] and Mangun et al. [21], this study presented stimuli to the lower visual fields. Spatial attention produced an increase in cerebral blood flow in dorsal occipital cortex of the contralateral hemisphere, which corresponded precisely with the location of the calculated dipole of the P1 attention effect. A secondary increase in blood flow was observed in the contralateral fusiform gyrus. of outstanding interest.
23. Gratton G. Attention and probability effects in the human occipital cortex: an optical imaging study. Neuroreport. 8:1997;1749-1753 Localized patterns of cortical neuronal activity during spatial attention were revealed by a novel optical imaging technique in which near-infrared light was passed through the head to an array of detectors over the scalp. Enhanced neural activity was observed in the lateral occipital cortex (Brodmann's area 19) in the hemisphere contralateral to the attended visual field in a time window corresponding to the P1 attention effect observed in previous studies. In contrast, neural activity localized to striate cortex was unaffected by attention. of special interest.
24. Motter BC. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2 and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 70:1993;909-919.
25. Luck SJ, Chelazzi L, Hillyard SA, Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 77:1997;24-42 Single-unit recordings were obtained from visual areas V1, V2 and V4 in monkeys trained to attend to sequences of stimuli flashed to locations inside or outside the neurons receptive fields. When both attended and unattended locations were included within a neuron's receptive field, the evoked neural discharge to attended stimuli was enhanced. Directing attention within a neuron's receptive field resulted in a tonically increased discharge that may reflect an attentional 'bias' signal. This work supports an extrastriate locus of attentional modulation. of special interest.
26. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L, Clark VP, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ, Mangun GR. Neuroimaging approaches to the study of visual attention: a tutorial. Coles M, Kramer A, Logan G. Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention. 1996;107-138 American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
27. Heslenfeld DJ, Kenemans JL, Kok A, Molenaar PCM. Feature processing and attention in the human visual system: an overview. Biol Psychol. 45:1997;183-215 Presents a thoughtful analysis of how ERP evidence can help to distinguish among alternative theoretical models of selective attention ERP data showed a clear dissociation between effects of physical stimulus structure (spatial frequency) and effects of selective attention. of special interest.
28. Eimer M. An event-related potential (ERP) study of transient and sustained visual attention to color and form. Biol Psychol. 44:1997;143-160.
29. Czigler I, Geczy I. Event-related potential correlates of color selection and lexical decision: hierarchical processing or late selection? Int J Psychophysiol. 22:1996;67-84 ERPs were recorded to sequences of words presented in relevant and irrelevant colors. Attended-color words elicited larger selection negativity and late positive components, but behavioral data showed that words were processed at a lexical level even when presented in the unattended color. The authors proposed a late selection mechanism during attention to color. of special interest.
30. Smid H, Jakob A, Heinze HJ. The organization of multidimensional selection on the basis of color and shape: an event-related brain potential study. Percept Psychophys. 59:1997;693-713 Subjects attended to sequences of stimuli differing in color and shape and selected targets on basis of a color - shape conjunction. ERPs revealed the timing of separate stages of parallel and integrative feature selection, demonstrating that color and shape were processed as 'separable' attributes. Global shape processing was found to be self-terminating, whereas local shape processing is exhaustive. Feature integration occurred before the completion of processing of the separate attributes. of special interest.
31. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;781-787.
32. Woods DL, Alho K, Algazi A. Stages of auditory feature conjunction: an event-related brain potential study. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept Perf]. 20:1994;81-94.
33. Smid H, Heinze HJ. An electrophysiological study of the selection of the color and shape of alphanumeric characters in response choice. Biol Psychol. 44:1997;161-185.
34. Karayanidis F, Michie PT. Frontal processing negativity in a visual selective attention task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 99:1996;38-56.
35. Karayanidis F, Michie PT. Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 103:1997;282-297 Subjects attended to stimulus sequences varying in color and orientation and attended to a specific combination of these features. Separate ERP patterns were associated with selection of the individual attended features, but an early component elicited by the attended feature combination suggested an early, pre-attentive analysis of feature conjunctions. of special interest.
36. Zani A, Proverbio AM. Attention modulation of short latency ERPs by selective attention to conjunction of spatial frequency and location. J Psychophys. 11:1997;21-32.
37. Weber TA, Kramer AF, Miller GA. Selective processing of superimposed objects: an electrophysiological analysis of object-based attentional selection. Biol Psychol. 45:1997;159-182.
38. Valdes-Sosa M, Bobes MA, Rodriguez V, Pinilla T. Switching attention without shifting the spotlight: object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 10:1998;137-151 Subjects attended to moving fields of stimuli defined by color and direction of movement. Selection of color-movement conjunctions or 'objects' was associated with marked enhancement of early P1 and N1 components to those stimuli. The author suggest that conjunctions of certain features are encoded and selected at an early level of processing. of outstanding interest.
39. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot S. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature. 381:1996;520-522.
40. Schendan H, Ganis G, Kutas M. Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology. 1998;. in press.
41. Botzel K, Schulze S, Stodieck SR. Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res. 104:1995;135-143.
42. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 8:1996;551-565 This study shows that the temporal N170 can be elicited by facial features (eyes) alone. A careful evaluation of scalp and intracranial data is included. of special interest.
43. George N, Evans J, Fiori N, Davidoff J, Renault B. Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cogn Brain Res. 4:1996;65-76.
44. George N, Jemel B, Fiori N, Renault B. Face and shape repetition effects in humans: a spatio-temporal ERP study. Neuroreport. 8:1997;1417-1423.
45. Jeffreys DA. Evoked potential studies of face and object processing. Vis Cogn. 3:1996;1-38 Summarizes the numerous parametric studies done by the author to investigate the face specificity of the central positive ERP component. of special interest.
46. Sams M, Hietanen JK, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lounasmaa OV. Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroscience. 77:1997;49-55.
47. Allison T, Ginter H, McCarthy G, Nobre AC, Puce A, Luby M, Spencer DD. Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 71:1994;821-825.
48. Allison T, McCarthy G, Nobre A, Puce A, Belger A. Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers and colors. Cereb Cortex. 4:1994;544-554.
49. Nobre AC, Allison T, McCarthy G. Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature. 372:1994;260-263.
50. Clark V, Keil K, Maisog J, Courtney S, Ungerleider L, Haxby J. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human visual cortex during face matching: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage. 4:1996;1-15.
51. Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, Gore JC, McCarthy G. Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonace imaging study. J Neurosci. 16:1996;5205-5215.
52. McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore JC, Allison T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci. 9:1997;605-610 This elegant study demonstrates the power of the fMRI technique in revealing a small right hemisphere fusiform area highly specialized for face perception. of outstanding interest.
53. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 17:1997;4302-4311.
54. Puce A, Allison T, Spencer S, Spencer D, McCarthy G. Comparison of cortical activation evoked by faces measured by intracranial field potentials and functional MRI: two case studies. Hum Brain Map. 5:1997;298-305.
55. Nobre AC, McCarthy G. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. J Neurosci. 15:1995;1090-1099.
56. Jacobson GP, Kraus N, McGee TJ. Hearing as reflected by middle and long latency event-related potentials. Alford BR, Jerger J, Jenkins HA. Electrophysiologic Evaluation in Otolaryngology. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology. 53:1997;46-84 Karger, Basel.
57. Woldorff MG, Gallen CC, Hampson SA, Hillyard SA, Pantev C, Sobel D, Bloom FE. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:1993;8722-8726.
58. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. 1992;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
59. Teder W, Kujala T, Näätänen R. Selection of speech messages in free-field listening. Neuroreport. 5:1993;307-309.
60. Teder W, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Interstimulus interval and the selective attention effect on auditory ERPs: 'N1 enhancement' versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;71-81.
61. Schröger E, Eimer M. Effects of lateralized cues on the processing of lateralized auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol. 43:1996;203-226.
62. Schröger E, Eimer M. Endogenous covert spatial orienting in audition: 'cost-benefit' analyses of reaction times and event-related potentials. Q J Exp Psychol. 50:1997;457-474 In a spatial cuing paradigm, the authors interpret effects of cue validity on reaction time and ERPs in terms of attentional selection being located at intermediate stages of information processing, rather than at peripheral stages such as sensory-specific processing or response selection. of special interest.
63. Teder-Sälejärvi WA, Hiilyard SA. The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free-field: an event-related potential (ERP) study. Percept Psychophys. 1998; Behavioral detection rates and concurrently recorded ERPs indicated that auditory attention was deployed as a finely tuned gradient around an attended sound source, supporting gradient models of auditory spatial attention. The ERP data suggested that two distinct stages are involved in spatial fine tuning of attention. of special interest.
64. Teder W, Näätänen R. Event-related potentials demonstrate a narrow focus of auditory spatial attention. Neuroreport. 5:1994;709-711.
65. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuirer G, Elbert T. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 94:1995;26-40.
66. Eulitz C, Diesch E, Pantev C, Hampson S, Elbert T. Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. J Neurosci. 15:1995;2748-2755.
67. Pantev C, Elbert T, Ross B, Eulitz C, Terhardt E. Binaural fusion and the representation of virtual pitch in the human auditory cortex. Hear Res. 100:1996;164-170 Neuromagnetic recordings indicated that the center of activation within the cortical tonotopic map corresponds to the location of perceived pitch and not to the locations that are activated when single-frequency constituents are presented. of special interest.
68. Ragot R, Lepaul-Ercole R. Brain potentials as objective indexes of auditory pitch extraction from harmonics. Neuroreport. 7:1996;905-909.
69. Diesch E, Luce T. Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;501-510 Neuromagnetic responses elicited by two composite stimuli (a two-tone combination and a two-format vowel) and by their individually presented constituents were recorded. The evoked response to the composite stimuli differed from the linear sum of the constituents in latency, dipole moment, and location, with the sources for the formant being situated more laterally than those for the tones. of special interest.
70. Winkler I, Tervaniemi M, Näätänen R. Two separate codes for missing-fundamental pitch in the human auditory cortex. J Acoust Soc Am. 102:1997;1072-1082.
71. Schröger E, Wolff C. Fast preattentive processing of location: a functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neurosci Lett. 232:1997;5-8 This study demonstrated a temporal advantage in the pre-attentive processing of location information relative to frequency information. The MMN responses to changes in location were shorter in latency than those elicited by changes in frequency, suggesting that spatial information is encoded faster than spectral information. of special interest.
72. Alain C, Woods DL, Covarrubias D. Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 104:1997;531-539 This study showed varying temporal integration functions for different N1 subcomponents, which varied as a function of tone frequency. The results suggest that different auditory cortical areas may have different temporal integration times. of special interest.
73. Näätänen R, Alho K. Mismatch negativity - the measure for central sound representation accuracy. Audiol Neuro-Otol. 2:1997;341-352 A comprehensive review of recent findings of MMN studies with emphasis on accuracy of representation of feature-specific and discriminating information in audition. of special interest.
74. Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB. Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science. 273:1996;971-973.
75. Näätänen R, Lehtokoski A, Lennes M, Cheor M, Huotilainen M, Iivonen A, Vainion M, Alku P, Ilmoniemi RJ, Luuk A, et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature. 385:1997;432-434 This study demonstrates the existence of language-specific phonome memory traces in the human brain, which are activated only by speech and not by equally complex non-speech stimuli. In a comparison between Finns and Estonians, rare deviant stimuli triggered a reliable MMN response only when the sound deviation crossed a phonemic boundary in the native language. of outstanding interest.
76. Csépe V, Pantev C, Hoke M, Ross B, Hampson S. Mismatch field to tone pairs: neuromagnetic evidence for temporal integration at the sensory level. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 104:1997;1-9 Magnetic recordings using random single-tone and paired-tone sequences demonstrated a fundamental difference between the N1m (magnetic counterpart of the N1) and the mismatch field (MMF) elicited by minor pitch changes. Whereas the N1m reflected the processing of every individual tone, the MMF instead reflected changes between the paired stimuli as unitary events. of special interest.
77. Yabe H, Tervaniemi M, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. Neuroreport. 8:1997;1971-1974.
78. Alho K. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear. 16:1995;38-51.
79. Schröger E. A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 8:1996;527-539.
80. Trejo LJ, Ryan-Jones DL, Kramer AF. Attentional modulation of the mismatch negativity elicited by frequency differences between binaurally presented tone bursts. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;319-328.
81. Alain C, Woods DL. Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;534-546 ERPs were recorded from subjects who attended to infrequent changes in an alternating tone pattern in a designated ear while ignoring a similar auditory pattern presented to the opposite ear. In a control condition (reading), all tone patterns were to be ignored. In all conditions, the infrequent changes elicited a MMN, which was enhanced in the attention condition. of special interest.
82. Woldorff MG, Hillyard SA, Gallen CC, Hampson SR, Bloom FE. Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology. 1998.
83. Korpilahti P, Lang HA. Auditory ERP components and mismatch negativity in dysphasic children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 91:1994;256-264.
84. Korpilahti P. Auditory discrimination and memory functions in SLI children: a comprehensive study with neurophysiological and behavioural methods. Scand J Logop Phoniatr. 20:1995;131-139.
85. Csépe V, Molnár M. Towards the possible clinical application of the mismatch negativity component of event-related potentials. Audiol Neuro-Otol. 2:1997;354-369 An overview of proposed clinical applications of the MMN in syndromes where abnormal processing or storing of auditory features is involved. of special interest.
86. Kujala T, Huotilainen M, Sinkkonen J, Ahonen AI, Alho K, Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi R, Kajola M, Knuutila JET, Lavikainen J, et al. Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci Lett. 183:1995;143-146 Magnetic brain responses to auditory stimuli were recorded and correlated with MRI in blind individuals. Responses to ignored deviant stimuli were localized to temporal areas, whereas attended deviant tones elicited activity in occipital areas. of special interest.
87. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Three-dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. 1988;Thieme Medical Publishers, New York.