Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: A behavioral and neural perspective

Brain and Language

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 151-161

  Zion Golumbic, Elana M ^a,b   Poeppel, David ^c   Schroeder, Charles E ^a,b  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Auditory; Entrainment; Oscillations; Rhythm; Speech; Time

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PHONEME; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862889659     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S., Kraus N. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(15):3958-3965.
2. Ahissar E., Ahissar M. Processing of the temporal envelope of speech. The auditory cortex: A synthesis of human and animal research 2005, 295-313. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., London. R. Konig, P. Heil, E. Budinger, H. Scheich (Eds.).
3. Ahissar E., Nagarajan S., Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Mahncke H., Merzenich M.M. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(23):13367-13372.
4. Aiken S.J., Picton T.W. Human cortical responses to the speech envelope. Ear and Hearing 2008, 29(2):139-157.
5. Alain C., Arnott S.R. Selectively attending to auditory objects. Frontiers in Bioscience 2000, 5:d202-212.
6. Allen J.B. How do humans process and recognize speech?. Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Transactions on 1994, 2(4):567-577.
7. Allen J.B. Articulation and intelligibility 2005, Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael.
8. Arai, T., & Greenberg, S. (1998, 12-15 May 1998). Speech intelligibility in the presence of cross-channel spectral asynchrony. In Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing.
9. Arciuli J., Slowiaczek L.M. The where and when of linguistic word-level prosody. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(11):2638-2642.
10. Arnal L.H., Wyart V., Giraud A.-L. Transitions in neural oscillations reflect prediction errors generated in audiovisual speech. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14(6):797-801.
11. Atal, B., & Schroeder, M. (1978, April 1978). Predictive coding of speech signals and subjective error criteria. In Paper presented at the acoustics, speech, and signal processing, IEEE international conference on ICASSP '78.
12. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(8):617-629.
13. Barnes R., Jones M.R. Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41(3):254-311.
14. Beauvois M.W., Meddis R. Computer simulation of auditory stream segregation in alternating-tone sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 99(4):2270-2280.
15. Bendor D., Wang X. Differential neural coding of acoustic flutter within primate auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(6):763-771.
16. Bernstein L.E., Eberhardt S.P., Demorest M.E. Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, 85(1):397-405.
17. Besle J., Fischer C., Bidet-Caulet A.l., Lecaignard F., Bertrand O., Giard M.-H.l.n. Visual activation and audiovisual interactions in the auditory cortex during speech perception: Intracranial recordings in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(52):14301-14310.
18. Besle J., Schevon C.A., Mehta A.D., Lakatos P., Goodman R.R., McKhann G.M., et al. Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(9):3176-3185.
19. Bidet-Caulet A., Fischer C., Besle J., Aguera P., Giard M., Bertrand O. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(35):9252-9261.
20. Blesser B. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: I. Phonetic characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1972, 15(1):5-41.
21. Boemio A., Fromm S., Braun A., Poeppel D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(3):389-395.
22. Bonte M., Valente G., Formisano E. Dynamic and task-dependent encoding of speech and voice by phase reorganization of cortical oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(6):1699-1706.
23. Borsky S., Tuller B., Shapiro L.P. How to milk a coat: The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 103(5):2670-2676.
24. Brechmann A., Scheich H. Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(5):578-587.
25. Bregman A.S. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound 1990, MIT Press.
26. Buzsáki G., Chrobak J.J. Temporal structure in spatially organized neuronal ensembles: A role for interneuronal networks. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1995, 5(4):504-510.
27. Campanella S., Belin P. Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(12):535-543.
28. Campbell R. The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363(1493):1001-1010.
29. Canolty R., Edwards E., Dalal S., Soltani M., Nagarajan S., Kirsch H., et al. High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 2006, 313(5793):1626-1628.
30. Canolty R.T., Knight R.T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(11):506-515.
31. Chandrasekaran C., Trubanova A., Stillittano S.b., Caplier A., Ghazanfar A.A. The natural statistics of audiovisual speech. PLoS Computational Biology 2009, 5(7):e1000436.
32. Chandrasekaran C., Turesson H.K., Brown C.H., Ghazanfar A.A. The influence of natural scene dynamics on auditory cortical activity. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(42):13919-13931.
33. Chen F. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: A study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech. Medical Engineering & Physics 2011, 33(8):1033-1038.
34. Cherry E.C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1953, 25:975-979.
35. Chi T., Gao Y., Guyton M.C., Ru P., Shamma S. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106(5):2719-2732.
36. Connine C.M. Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26(5):527-538.
37. Connine C.M., Clifton C.J. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13(2):291-299.
38. Cooper W.E., Paccia-Cooper J. Syntax and speech Cambridge 1980, Harvard University Press, Mass.
39. Cooper W.E., Paccia J.M., Lapointe S.G. Hierarchical coding in speech timing. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10(2):154-177.
40. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(3):201-215.
41. Creutzfeldt O., Hellweg F., Schreiner C. Thalamocortical transformation of responses to complex auditory stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 1980, 39(1):87-104.
42. Cusack R., Decks J., Aikman G., Carlyon R.P. Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):643-656.
43. Cutler A., Norris D. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14(1):113-121.
44. Darwin C.J., Hukin R.W. Auditory objects of attention: The role of interaural time differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25(3):617-629.
45. de Ribaupierre F., Goldstein M.H., Yeni-Komshian G. Cortical coding of repetitive acoustic pulses. Brain Research 1972, 48:205-225.
46. Denham S.L., Winkler I. The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2006, 100(1-3):154-170.
47. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102(5):2731-2743.
48. Drullman R. The significance of temporal modulation frequencies for speech intelligibility. Listening to speech: An auditory perspective 2006, 39-48. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth (Eds.).
49. Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95(5):2670-2680.
50. Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95(2):1053-1064.
51. Dugué P., Le Bouquin-Jeannès R., Edeline J.-M., Faucon G. A physiologically based model for temporal envelope encoding in human primary auditory cortex. Hearing Research 2010, 268(1-2):133-144.
52. Eggermont J.J. Between sound and perception: Reviewing the search for a neural code. Hearing Research 2001, 157(1-2):1-42.
53. Eggermont J.J., Smith G.M. Synchrony between single-unit activity and local field potentials in relation to periodicity coding in primary auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73(1):227-245.
54. Eimas P.D. Segmental and syllabic representations in the perception of speech by young infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 105(3):1901-1911.
55. Elhilali M., Fritz J.B., Klein D.J., Simon J.Z., Shamma S.A. Dynamics of precise spike timing in primary auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(5):1159-1172.
56. Elhilali M., Ma L., Micheyl C., Oxenham A.J., Shamma S.A. Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes. Neuron 2009, 61(2):317-329.
57. Elhilali M., Shamma S.A. A cocktail party with a cortical twist: How cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(6):3751-3771.
58. Endress A.D., Hauser M.D. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 61(2):177-199.
59. Eskandar E.N., Assad J.A. Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2(1):88-93.
60. Fant G. In acoustic theory of speech production 1960, Mouton, The Hague.
61. Ferrand L., Segui J., Grainger J. Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:708-723.
62. Fodor J.D., Ferreira F. Reanalysis in sentence processing 1998, Dordrecht Kluwer.
63. French N.R., Steinberg J.C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1947, 19:90-119.
64. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6(2):78-84.
65. Fries P. Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2009, 32(1):209-224.
66. Fries P., Nikolic D., Singer W. The gamma cycle. Trends in Neurosciences 2007, 30(7):309-316.
67. Fries P., Womelsdorf T., Oostenveld R., Desimone R. The effects of visual stimulation and selective visual attention on rhythmic neuronal synchronization in macaque area V4. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:4823-4835.
68. Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001, 110(2):1150-1163.
69. Frisina R.D. Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing. Hearing Reserach 2001, 158(1-2):1-27.
70. Fritz J., Shamma S., Elhilali M., Klein D.J. Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:1216-1223.
71. Fritz J.B., Elhilali M., David S.V., Shamma S.A. Auditory attention - Focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17(4):437-455.
72. Fritz J.B., Elhilali M., Shamma S.A. Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(33):7623-7635.
73. Funkenstein H.H., Winter P. Responses to acoustic stimuli of units in the auditory cortex of awake squirrel monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 1973, 18(5):464-488.
74. Gaese B.H., Ostwald J. Temporal coding of amplitude and frequency modulation in the rat auditory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 7(3):438-450.
75. Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1981, 78(4):2643-2647.
76. Ganong W.r. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980, 6(1):110-125.
77. Gardner F.M. Phaselock techniques 2005, Wiley, New York. 3rd ed.
78. Gehr D.D., Komiya H., Eggermont J.J. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls. Hearing Research 2000, 150(1-2):27-42.
79. Gentilucci M., Corballis M.C. From manual gesture to speech: A gradual transition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30(7):949-960.
80. Ghitza O. Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology: Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:130. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00130.
81. Ghitza O., Greenberg S. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: Intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica 2009, 66(1-2):113-126.
82. Giraud A.-L., Kleinschmidt A., Poeppel D., Lund T.E., Frackowiak R.S.J., Laufs H. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007, 56(6):1127-1134.
83. Giraud A.-L., Lorenzi C., Ashburner J., Wable J., Johnsrude I., Frackowiak R., et al. Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 84(3):1588-1598.
84. Giraud A.-L., Poeppel D. Speech perception from a neurophysiological perspective. The human auditory cortex 2011, Springer, Berlin. O.T. PoeppelD, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
85. Grant, K. W., & Greenberg, S. (2001). Speech intelligibility derived from asynchronous processing of auditory-visual information. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the workshop on audio-visual speech processing, Scheelsminde, Denmark.
86. Greenberg S., Ainsworth W. Listening to speech: An auditory perspective 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
87. Greenberg S., Ainsworth W.A. Speech processing in the auditory system 2004, Springer-Verlag, New York.
88. Greenberg, S., Arai, T., & Silipo, R. (1998). Speech intelligibility derived from exceedingly sparse spectral information. In Int. conf. spoken lang. proc., pp. 2803-2806.
89. Greenberg S., Carvey H., Hitchcock L., Chang S. Temporal properties of spontaneous speech: A syllable-centric perspective. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:465-485.
90. Hafter E., Sarampalis A., Loui P. Auditory attention and filters. Auditory perception of sound sources 2007, Springer-Verlag. W. Yost (Ed.).
91. Harding, S., Cooke, M., & König, P. (2007). Auditory gist perception: an alternative to attentional selection of auditory streams? In Paper presented at the 4th international workshop on attention in cognitive systems, WAPCV, Hyderabad, India.
92. Hartmann W.M., Johnson D. Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music perception: An interdisciplinary journal 1991, 9(2):155-183.
93. Hickok G. Parallel parsing: Evidence from reactivation in garden-path sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1993, 22(2):239-250.
94. Hillyard S., Hink R., Schwent V., Picton T. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 1973, 182:177-180.
95. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 2002, 36(5):791-804.
96. Holt L.L., Lotto A.J. Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects. Hearing Research 2002, 167(1-2):156-169.
97. Hosoya T., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 2005, 436(7047):71-77.
98. Hubel D.H., Henson C.O., Rupert A., Galambos R. Attention units in the auditory cortex. Science 1959, 129(3358):1279-1280.
99. Jones M.R., Johnston H.M., Puente J. Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53(1):59-96.
100. Joris P.X., Schreiner C.E., Rees A. Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiological Reviews 2004, 84(2):541-577.
101. Kayser C., Montemurro M.A., Logothetis N.K., Panzeri S. Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. Neuron 2009, 61(4):597-608.
102. Kayser C., Petkov C.I., Logothetis N.K. Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(7):1560-1574.
103. Kerlin J.R., Shahin A.J., Miller L.M. Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party" Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(2):620-628.
104. Kiebel S.J., von Kriegstein K., Daunizeau J., Friston K.J. Recognizing sequences of sequences. PLoS Computational Biology 2009, 5(8):e1000464.
105. Kilner J., Friston K., Frith C. Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(3):159-166.
106. Kingsbury B.E.D., Morgan N., Greenberg S. Robust speech recognition using the modulation spectrogram. Speech Communication 1998, 25(1-3):117-132.
107. Lakatos P., Chen C.-M., O'Connell M.N., Mills A., Schroeder C.E. Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 53(2):279-292.
108. Lakatos P., Karmos G., Mehta A.D., Ulbert I., Schroeder C.E. Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science 2008, 320(5872):110-113.
109. Lakatos P., O'Connell M.N., Barczak A., Mills A., Javitt D.C., Schroeder C.E. The leading sense: Supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention. Neuron 2009, 64(3):419-430.
110. Lakatos P., Shah A.S., Knuth K.H., Ulbert I., Karmos G., Schroeder C.E. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94(3):1904-1911.
111. Lalor E.C., Foxe J.J. Neural responses to uninterrupted natural speech can be extracted with precise temporal resolution. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 31(1):189-193.
112. Lange K. Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69(1):127-137.
113. Lange K., Röder B. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(5):715-729.
114. Large E.W. On synchronizing movements to music. Human Movement Science 2000, 19(4):527-566.
115. Large E.W., Jones M.R. The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review 1999, 106(1):119-159.
116. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals 1970, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
117. Liberman A.M., Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(5):187-196.
118. Liégeois-Chauvel C., Lorenzi C., Trébuchon A., Régis Jean., Chauvel P. Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(7):731-740.
119. Luo H., Liu Z., Poeppel D. Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biology 2010, 8(8):e1000445.
120. Luo H., Poeppel D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 54(6):1001-1010.
121. Mann V.A. Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1980, 28(5):407-412.
122. Mattys S. The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4(3):310-329.
123. Mazzoni A., Whittingstall K., Brunel N., Logothetis N.K., Panzeri S. Understanding the relationships between spike rate and delta/gamma frequency bands of LFPs and EEGs using a local cortical network model. NeuroImage 2010, 52(3):956-972.
124. McCabe S.L., Denham M.J. A model of auditory streaming. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101(3):1611-1621.
125. McDermott J.H. The cocktail party problem. Current Biology 2009, 19(22):R1024-R1027.
126. Mehler J., Dommergues J.Y., Frauenfelder U., Segui J. The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20(3):298-305.
127. Miller G.A., Heise G.A., Lichten W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951, 41(5):329-335.
128. Montemurro M.A., Rasch M.J., Murayama Y., Logothetis N.K., Panzeri S. Phase-of-firing coding of natural visual stimuli in primary visual cortex. Current Biology 2008, 18(5):375-380.
129. Monto S., Palva S., Voipio J., Palva J.M. Very slow EEG fluctuations predict the dynamics of stimulus detection and oscillation amplitudes in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(33):8268-8272.
130. Moore B.C.J., Gockel H. Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 2002, 88:320-332.
131. Munhall K.G., Jones J.A., Callan D.E., Kuratate T., Vatikiotis-Bateson E. Visual prosody and speech intelligibility. Psychological Science 2004, 15(2):133-137.
132. Nagarajan S.S., Cheung S.W., Bedenbaugh P., Beitel R.E., Schreiner C.E., Merzenich M.M. Representation of spectral and temporal envelope of twitter vocalizations in common marmoset primary auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 87(4):1723-1737.
133. Nahum M., Nelken I., Ahissar M. Low-level information and high-level perception: The case of speech in noise. PLoS Biology 2008, 6(5):e126.
134. Nelken I., Ahissar M. High-level and low-level processing in the auditory system: The role of primary auditory cortex. Dynamics of speech production and perception 2006, 343-354. IOS Press, Amsterdam, NLD. P.L. Divenyi, S. Greenberg, G. Meyer (Eds.).
135. Nobre A.C., Correa A., Coull J.T. The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17(4):465-470.
136. Nobre A.C., Coull J.T. Attention and time 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
137. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A., Butterfield S. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 34(3):191-243.
138. Nourski K.V., Reale R.A., Oya H., Kawasaki H., Kovach C.K., Chen H., et al. Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(49):15564-15574.
139. Nygaard L., Pisoni D. Speech perception: New directions in research and theory. Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language and communication 1995, 63-96. Academic, San Diego, CA. J. Miller, P. Eimas (Eds.).
140. Otake T., Hatano G., Cutler A., Mehler J. Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32(2):258-278.
141. Pavlovic C.V. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987, 82(2):413-422.
142. Phillips C., Wagers M. Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics 2007, 739-756. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. G. Gaskell (Ed.).
143. Pickett J.M., Pollack I. Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: Effects of rate of utterance and duration of excerpt. Language and Speech 1963, 6(3):151-164.
144. Pickles J.O. An introduction to the physiology of hearing 2008, Emerald, London. 3rd ed.
145. Picton T.W., Skinner C.R., Champagne S.C., Kellett A.J.C., Maiste A.C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987, 82(1):165-178.
146. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Communica 2003, 41:245-255.
147. Poeppel D., Idsardi W.J., van Wassenhove V. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363(1493):1071-1086.
148. Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K. Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58(1):1-23.
149. Ray S., Niebur E., Hsiao S.S., Sinai A., Crone N.E. High-frequency gamma activity (80â€" 150Hz) is increased in human cortex during selective attention. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119(1):116-133.
150. Repp B.H. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 92(1):81-110.
151. Reynolds J.H., Heeger D.J. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 2009, 61(2):168-185.
152. Rodenburg M., Verweij C., van der Brink G. Analysis of evoked responses in man elicited by sinusoidally modulated noise. International Journal of Audiology 1972, 11(5-6):283-293.
153. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Biological Sciences 1992, 336(1278):367-373.
154. Rotman Y., Bar-Yosef O., Nelken I. Relating cluster and population responses to natural sounds and tonal stimuli in cat primary auditory cortex. Hearing Research 2001, 152(1-2):110-127.
155. Saberi K., Perrott D.R. Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature 1999, 398(6730):760. 760.
156. Sanders L.D., Astheimer L.B. Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence. Perceptual Psychophysiology 2008, 70(4):732-742.
157. Scarborough R., Keating P., Mattys S.L., Cho T., Alwan A. Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English. Language and Speech 2009, 52:135-175.
158. Schreiner C.E., Urbas J.V. Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields. Hearing Research 1988, 32(1):49-63.
159. Schroeder C.E., Lakatos P. The gamma oscillation: Master or slave?. Brain Topography 2009, 22(1):24-26.
160. Schroeder C.E., Lakatos P. Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences 2009, 32(1):9-18.
161. Schroeder C.E., Lakatos P., Kajikawa Y., Partan S., Puce A. Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends in Cognitive Science 2008, 12(3):106-113.
162. Schroeder C.E., Wilson D.A., Radman T., Scharfman H., Lakatos P. Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20(2):172-176.
163. Shamma S.A., Elhilali M., Micheyl C. Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences 2011, 34(3):114-123.
164. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270(5234):303-304.
165. Shastri, L., Chang, S., & Greenberg, S. (1999). Syllable detection and segmentation using temporal flow neural networks. In Paper presented at the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences, San Francisco, CA.
166. Shukla M., Nespor M., Mehler J. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 54(1):1-32.
167. Sovijärvi A. Detection of natural complex sounds by cells in the primary auditory cortex of the cat. Acta Physiologica Scandinavia 1975, 93(3):318-335.
168. Stefanics G., Hangya B., Hernã¡di I., Winkler I., Lakatos P., Ulbert I. Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(41):13578-13585.
169. Stevens K.N. Acoustic phonetics 1998, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
170. Stone M.A., Fullgrabe C., Moore B.C.J. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010, 128(4):2127-2137.
171. Sumby W.H., Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1954, 26:212-215.
172. Summerfield Q. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 1992, 335(1273):71-78.
173. Sussman E.S., Orr M. The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2007, 69(1):136-152.
174. Tank D.W., Hopfield J.J. Neural computation by concentrating information in time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1987, 84(7):1896-1900.
175. Theunissen F., Miller J.P. Temporal encoding in nervous systems: A rigorous definition. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 1995, 2(2):149-162.
176. Thorne J.D., De Vos M., Viola F.C., Debener S. Cross-modal phase reset predicts auditory task performance in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(10):3853-3861.
177. Todd N.P.M., Lee C.S., O'Boyle D.J. A sensorimotor theory of speech perception: Implications for learning, organization and recognition. Listening to speech: An auditory perspective 2006, 351-373. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey. S. Greenberg, W.A. Ainsworth (Eds.).
178. van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(4):1181-1186.
179. van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(3):598-607.
180. Viemeister N.F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979, 66(5):1364-1380.
181. Wang X., Merzenich M.M., Beitel R., Schreiner C.E. Representation of a species-specific vocalization in the primary auditory cortex of the common marmoset: Temporal and spectral characteristics. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 74(6):2685-2706.
182. Warren R. The relation of speech perception to the perception of nonverbal auditory patterns. Listening to speech: An auditory perspective 2004, 333-350. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ. S. Greenberg, W.A. Ainsworth (Eds.).
183. Warren R., Bashford J., Gardner D. Tweaking the lexicon: Organization of vowel sequences into words. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1990, 47(5):423-432.
184. Whitfield I.C., Evans E.F. Responses of auditory cortical neurons to stimuli of changing frequency. Journal of Neurophysiology 1965, 28(4):655-672.
185. Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91(3):1707-1717.
186. Will U., Berg E. Brain wave synchronization and entrainment to periodic acoustic stimuli. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 424(1):55-60.
187. Winkowski D.E., Knudsen E.I. Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl. Nature 2006, 439(7074):336-339.
188. Winkowski D.E., Knudsen E.I. Distinct mechanisms for top-down control of neural gain and sensitivity in the owl optic tectum. Neuron 2008, 60(4):698-708.
189. Woldorff M.G., Gallen C.C., Hampson S.A., Hillyard S.A., Pantev C., Sobel D., et al. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1993, 90(18):8722-8726.
190. Womelsdorf T., Schoffelen J.-M., Oostenveld R., Singer W., Desimone R., Engel A.K., et al. Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization. Science 2007, 316(5831):1609-1612.
191. Wu C.T., Weissman D.H., Roberts K.C., Woldorff M.G. The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention. Brain Research 2007, 1134:187-198.
192. Zion Golumbic, E. M., Bickel, S., Cogan, G. B., Mehta, A. D., Schevon, C. A., Emerson, R. G., et al. (2010). Low-frequency phase modulations as a tool for attentional selection at a cocktail party: Insights from intracranial EEG and MEG in humans. In Paper presented at the Neurobiology of Language Conference, San Diego, CA.