Sharp or smooth? Comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 535-542

  McCarthy, John D ^a   Sasse, M Angela ^a   Miras, Dimitrios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Quality of Service; Quantization factors; Video frame rate; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; INTERNET; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EYE TRACKING; QUANTIZATION FACTORS; VIDEO FRAME RATE; VIDEO STREAMING;

VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 4544239324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aldridge, R., Davidoff, J., Ghanbari, M., Hands, D. & Pearson, D. Measurement of scene-dependent quality variations in digitally-coded television pictures. IEE Proceedings on Vision, Signal and Image Processing, (1995) 142, 149-154.
2. Apteker, R.T, Fisher, J.A., Kisimov, V.S. & Neishlos, H. Video Acceptability and Frame Rate. IEEE Multimedia, 3(3):32-40, 1995.
3. Bouch, A & Sasse, M.A. The case for predictable media quality in networked multimedia applications. In K. Nahrstedt & W. Feng [Eds.]: Proceedings of ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN'00), 25-27th January 2000, San Jose, USA. pp 188-195.
4. De Ridder, H. & Hamberg, R. Continuous Assessment of Image Quality. SMPTE Journal. 106(2): 123-128, Feb 1997.
5. Fechner, G. T. Elements of psychophysics (Vol. 1). (H. E. Adler, Trans. 1966). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1860).
6. Fukuda, K. Integrated QOS control mechanisms for real-time multimedia systems in reservation -based networks. PHD Thesis, School of Engineering Science, Osaka University. Jan 2000. Available at http://www.anarg.jp/ achievements/web1999/papers/k-
7. Ghinea, G. and Thomas, J.P. QoS Impact on User Perception and Understanding of Multimedia Video Clips. in Proceedings of ACM Multimedia '98 (Bristol, UK, 1998)
8. Hamberg, R. & de Ridder, H. Time varying Image Quality: Modelling the relations between instantaneous and overall quality. SMPTE Journal, 802-811, Nov 1999.
9. Hands, D. P-QoS for Mobile Multimedia available at http://www.iee.org/ oncomms/pn/visualinformation/P-
10. IBM. Functions of mobile multimedia QOS control (Updated Feb 2002). Available at http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/mmqos/system_e.htm
11. ITU-R BT.500-11. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Revised 2002.
12. Knoche, H., De Meer, H. G. & Kirsh, D. Utility Curves: Mean Opinion Scores Considered Biased, Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Quality of Service, 1st - 4th June 1999, University College London, London, UK.
13. LC Technologies Inc. See http://www.eyegaze.com/
14. Masry, M.A. and Hemami, S.S. CVQE: A metric for continuous video quality evaluation at low bit rates. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Image Processing 2001, Thessaloniki, Greece, October 2001.
15. Wang, D., Speranza, F., Vincent, A., Martin, T. & Blanchfield, P. Towards Optimal Rate Control: A Study of the Impact of Spatial Resolution, Frame Rate and Quantization on Subjective Quality and Bitrate. Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP 2003).