Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: A functional MRI study

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 163-170

  Reddy, Leila ^a,b   Rémy, Florence ^a,b   Vayssière, Nathalie ^a,b   VanRullen, Rufin ^a,b  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Bistable perception; FMRI; Parietal cortex; Wagon wheel illusion

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651452603     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: 10970193     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985): Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 284-299.
2. Andrews T, Purves D (2005): The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 261-263.
3. Andrews T, Purves D, Simpson WA, VanRullen R (2005): The wheel keeps turning: Reply to Holcombe et al. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 561.
4. Battelli L, Cavanagh P, Intriligator J, Tramo MJ, Henaff MA, Michel F, Barton JJ (2001): Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion. Neuron 32: 985-995.
5. Battelli L, Cavanagh P, Martini P, Barton JJ (2003): Bilateral deficits of transient visual attention in right parietal patients. Brain 126 (Part 10): 2164-2174.
6. Battelli L, Pascual-Leone A, Cavanagh P (2007): The "when" pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 204-210.
7. Battelli L, Walsh V, Pascual-Leone A, Cavanagh P (2008): The "when" parietal pathway explored by lesion studies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18: 120-126.
8. Britz J, Landis T, Michel CM (2009): Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cerebral Cortex 19: 55-65.
9. Burr DC, Ross J, Morone MC (1986): Smooth and sampled motion. Vision Res 26: 643-652.
10. Claeys KG, Lindsey DT, De Schutter E, Orban GA (2003): A higher order motion region in human inferior parietal lobule: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron 40: 631-642.
11. Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, Drury HA, Linenweber MR, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Van Essen DC, et al. (1998): A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21: 761-773.
12. Corbetta M, Kincade JM, Ollinger JM, McAvoy MP, Shulman GL (2000): Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 3: 292-297.
13. Culham JC, Kanwisher NG (2001): Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 157-163.
14. Culham JC, Cavanagh P, Kanwisher NG (2001): Attention response functions: Characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron 32: 737-745.
15. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM (1999): High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 272-284.
16. Holcombe AO, Seizova-Cajic T (2008): Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli. Vision Res 48: 1743-1757.
17. Holcombe AO, Clifford CW, Eagleman DM, Pakarian P (2005): Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 559-560.
18. Kamitani Y, Tong F. (2006): Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex. Curr Biol 16: 1096-1102.
19. Kastner S, Pinsk MA, De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1999): Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22: 751-761.
20. Kleinschmidt A, Buchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS (1998): Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc Biol Sci 265: 2427-2433.
21. Kleinschmidt A, Thilo KV, Buchel C, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM, Frackowiak RS (2002): Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion. Neuroimage 16: 873-882.
22. Kline KA, Eagleman DM (2008): Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal. J Vis 8: 1-5.
23. Kline K, Holcombe AO, Eagleman DM (2004): Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Res 44: 2653-2658.
24. Kline K, Holcombe AO, Eagleman DM (2006): Illusory motion reversal does not imply discrete processing: Reply to Rojas et al. Vis Res 46: 1158-1159.
25. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998): Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
26. Motter BC, Steinmetz MA, Duffy CJ, Mountcastle VB (1987): Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: Mechanisms of directionality along a single axis. J Neurosci 7: 154-176.
27. Orban GA, Fize D, Peuskens H, Denys K, Nelissen K, Sunaert S, Todd J, Vanduffel W. (2003): Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 41: 1757-1768.
28. Orban GA, Claeys K, Nelissen K, Smans R, Sunaert S, Todd JT, Wardak C, Durand JB, Vanduffel W (2006): Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia 44: 2647-2667.
29. Purves D, Paydarfar JA, Andrews TJ (1996): The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3693-3697.
30. Reichardt W (1961): Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: Rosenblith WA, editor. Sensory Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp 300-321.
31. Rojas D, Carmona-Fontaine C, Lopez-Calderon J, Aboitiz F (2006): Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals? Vis Res 46: 1155-1157.
32. Schouten JF (1967): Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In: Wathen-Dunn I, editor. Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp 44-45.
33. Sterzer P, Kleinschmidt A (2007): A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 323-328.
34. Sterzer P, Russ MO, Preibisch C, Kleinschmidt A (2002): Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion. Neuroimage 15: 908-916.
35. VanRullen R (2006): The continuous wagon wheel illusion is object-based. Vis Res 46: 4091-4095.
36. VanRullen R (2007): The continuous wagon wheel illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation. Vis Res 47: 2143-2149.
37. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C (2005): Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 5291-5296.
38. VanRullen R, Reddy L, Koch C (2006): The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. J Neurosci 26: 502-507.
39. VanRullen R, Pascual-Leone A, Battelli L (2008): The continuous wagon wheel illusion and the "when" pathway of the right parietal lobe: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS ONE 3: e2911.
40. van Santen JP, Sperling G (1985): Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 300-321.
41. Williams ZM, Elfar JC, Eskandar EN, Toth LJ, Assad JA (2003): Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion. Nat Neurosci 6: 616-623.
42. Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N (1999): The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 23: 747-764.
43. Yantis S, Schwarzbach J, Serences JT, Carlson RL, Steinmetz MA, Pekar JJ, Courtney SM. (2002): Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci 5: 995-1002.