Evidence against the temporal subsampling account of illusory motion reversal

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Kline, Keith A ^a   Eagleman, David M ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Illusory motion; Motion aftereffect; Temporal sampling; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; ILLUSION; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL CORTEX;

HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 42349106091     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.4.13     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andrews, T., & Purves, D. (2005). The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 261-263.
2. Andrews, T. J., White, L. E., Binder, D., & Purves, D. (1996). Temporal events in cyclopean vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 3689-3692.
3. Burt, P., & Sperling, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171-195.
4. Caelli, T., Manning, M., & Finlay, D. (1993). A general correspondence approach to apparent motion. Perception, 22, 185-192.
5. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 119-126.
6. Holcombe, A. O., Clifford, C. W., Eagleman, D. M., & Pakarian, P. (2005). Illusory motion reversal in tune with motion detectors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 559-560.
7. Kline, K., Holcombe, A. O., & Eagleman, D. M. (2004). Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Research, 44, 2653-2658.
8. Kline, K. A., Holcombe, A. O., & Eagleman, D. M. (2006). Illusory motion reversal does not imply discrete processing: Reply to Rojas et al. Vision Research, 46, 1158-1159.
9. Purves, D., Paydarfar, J. A., & Andrews, T. J. (1996). The wagon-wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 3693-3697.
10. Rojas, D., Carmona-Fontaine, C., Lopez-Calderón, J., & Aboitiz, F. (2006). Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals? Vision Research, 46, 1155-1157.
11. Schouten, J. F. (1967). Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In WathenDunn (Ed.), Models for the perception of speech and visual form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Simpson, W. A., Shahani, U., & Manahilov, V. (2005). Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling. Neuroscience Letters, 375, 23-27.
13. VanRullen, R. (2006). The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based. Vision Research, 46, 4091-4095.
14. VanRullen, R. (2007). The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation. Vision Research, 47, 2143-2149.
15. VanRullen, R., Reddy, L., & Koch, C. (2005). Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 5291-5296.