The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 4091-4095

  VanRullen, Rufin ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Attention; Discrete processing; Illusion; Motion aftereffect; Motion perception; Object based; Oscillation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAGON WHEEL ILLUSION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEURONS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION;

EID: 33749548008     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews T., and Purves D. The wagon-wheel illusion in continuous light. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 6 (2005) 261-263
2. Burr D.C., Ross J., and Morrone M.C. Smooth and sampled motion. Vision Res. 26 4 (1986) 643-652
3. Culham J.C., Verstraten F.A., Ashida H., and Cavanagh P. Independent aftereffects of attention and motion. Neuron 28 2 (2000) 607-615
4. Gazzaniga M.S. Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies. Neuron 14 2 (1995) 217-228
5. James W. The principles of Psychology Vol. 1 (1890), Holt, New York
6. Kline K., Holcombe A.O., and Eagleman D.M. Illusory motion reversal is caused by rivalry, not by perceptual snapshots of the visual field. Vision Res. 44 23 (2004) 2653-2658
7. Kline K., Holcombe A.O., and Eagleman D.M. Illusory motion reversal does not imply discrete processing: Reply to Rojas et al. Vision Res. 46 6-7 (2006) 1158-1159
8. Koffka K. Principles of gestalt psychology (1935), Harcourt, NY
9. Kohler W. Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology (1947), Liverright, NY
10. Ledgeway T. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Vision Res. 34 21 (1994) 2879-2889
11. Mamassian P., and Goutcher R. Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. J. Vis. 5 4 (2005) 361-375
12. Marr D. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information (1982), W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
13. Mather G., Verstraten F.A., and Anstis S. The motion aftereffect: a modern perspective (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Nishida S., and Sato T. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Res. 35 4 (1995) 477-490
15. Pakarian P., and Yasamy M.T. Wagon-wheel illusion under steady illumination: real or illusory?. Perception. 32 11 (2003) 1307-1310
16. Poston T., and Stewart I. Nonlinear modeling of multistable perception. Behav. Sci. 23 5 (1978) 318-334
17. Purves D., Paydarfar J.A., and Andrews T.J. The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 8 (1996) 3693-3697
18. Richards W., Wilson H.R., and Sommer M.A. Chaos in percepts?. Biol. Cybern. 70 4 (1994) 345-349
19. Rojas D., Carmona-Fontaine C., Lopez-Calderon J., and Aboitiz F. Do discreteness and rivalry coexist in illusory motion reversals?. Vision Res. 46 6-7 (2006) 1155-1157
20. Sakata H., Shibutani H., Ito Y., Tsurugai K., Mine S., and Kusunoki M. Functional properties of rotation-sensitive neurons in the posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 101 2 (1994) 183-202
21. Schouten J.F. Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In: Wathen-Dunn I. (Ed). Models for the perception of speech and visual form (1967), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 44-45
22. Simpson W.A., Shahani U., and Manahilov V. Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling. Neurosci. Lett. 375 1 (2005) 23-27
23. VanRullen R., and Koch C. Is perception discrete or continuous?. Trends Cogn Sci. 7 5 (2003) 207-213
24. VanRullen R., Reddy L., and Koch C. Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 14 (2005) 5291-5296
25. VanRullen R., Reddy L., and Koch C. The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. J. Neurosci. 26 2 (2006) 502-507