The Evolution of Wing Shape in Ornamented-Winged Damselflies (Calopterygidae, Odonata)

Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 300-309

  Outomuro, David ^a   Adams, Dean C ^b   Johansson, Frank ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Phylogeny; Sexual signaling; Wing pigmentation

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CALOPTERYGIDAE; ODONATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 84878110424     PISSN: 00713260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-012-9214-3     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2007). Analysis of character divergence along environmental gradients and other covariates. Evolution, 61, 510-515.
2. Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2009). A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution, 63, 1143-1154.
3. Adams, D. C., & Nistri, A. (2010). Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 216.
4. Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16.
5. Anderson, C. N., & Grether, G. F. (2010). Character displacement in the fighting colours of Hetaerina damselflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 277, 3669-3675.
6. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Berwaerts, K., Aerts, P., & van Dyck, H. (2006). On the sex-specific mechanisms of butterfly flight: Flight performance relative to flight morphology, wing kinematics, and sex in Pararge aegeria. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 675-687.
8. Betts, C. R., & Wootton, R. J. (1988). Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): A preliminary analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 138, 271-288.
9. Blankers, T., Adams, D. C., & Wiens, J. J. (2012). Ecological radiation with limited morphological diversification in salamanders. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 634-646.
10. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717-745.
11. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Breuker, C. J., Brakefield, P. M., & Gibbs, M. (2007). The association between wing morphology and dispersal is sex-specific in the glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). European Journal of Entomology, 104, 445-452.
13. Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2007). Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology, 88, 683-692.
14. Contreras-Garduño, J., Buzatto, B. A., Serrano-Meneses, M. A., Nájera-Cordero, K., & Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2008). The size of the red wing spot of the American rubyspot as a heightened condition-dependent ornament. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 724-732.
15. Contreras-Garduño, J., Canales-Lazcano, J., & Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2006). Wing pigmentation, immune ability, fat reserves and territorial status in males of the rubyspot damselfly, Hetaerina americana. Journal of Ethology, 24, 165-173.
16. Cordero Rivera, A., Andrés, J. A., Córdoba-Aguilar, A., & Utzeri, C. (2004). Postmating sexual selection: allopatric evolution of sperm competition mechanisms and genital morphology in calopterygid damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). Evolution, 58, 349-359.
17. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2002). Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: A possible relation to sexual selection. Animal Behaviour, 63, 759-766.
18. Córdoba-Aguilar, A., & Cordero-Rivera, A. (2005). Evolution and ecology of Calopterygidae (Zygoptera: Odonata): Status of knowledge and research perspectives. Neotropical Entomology, 34, 861-879.
19. Debat, V., Bégin, M., Legout, H., & David, J. R. (2003). Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution, 57, 2773-2784.
20. Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Claramunt, S., Tobias, J. A., Baker, A., Aleixo, A., et al. (2012). Correlated evolution of beak morphology and song in the neotropical woodcreeper radiation. Evolution, 66, 2784-2797.
21. DeVries, P. J., Penz, C. M., & Hill, R. I. (2010). Vertical distribution, flight behaviour and evolution of wing morphology in Morpho butterflies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 1077-1085.
22. Dockx, C. (2007). Directional and stabilizing selection on wing size and shape in migrant and resident monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in Cuba. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92, 605-616.
23. Drake, A. G., & Klingenberg, C. P. (2008). The pace of morphological change: Historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 275, 71-76.
24. Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D., & Rambaut, A. (2012). Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1. 7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 1969-1973.
25. Dumont, H. J., Vanfleteren, J. R., De Jonckheere, J. F., & Weekers, P. H. H. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships, divergence time estimation, and global biogeographic patterns of Calopterygoid damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera) inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Biology, 54, 347-362.
26. Dumont, H. J., Vierstraete, A., & Vanfleteren, J. R. (2010). A molecular phylogeny of the Odonata (Insecta). Systematic Entomology, 35, 6-18.
27. Ellington, C. P. (1984). The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 305, 17-40.
28. Förschler, M. I., & Bairlein, F. (2011). Morphological shifts of the external flight apparatus across the range of a passerine (northern wheatear) with diverging migratory behaviour. PLoS ONE, 6, e18732.
29. Garland, T., Jr, Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1993). Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology, 42, 265-292.
30. Grether, G. F. (1996a). Intrasexual competition alone favors a sexually dimorphic ornament in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution, 50, 1949-1957.
31. Grether, G. F. (1996b). Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution, 50, 1939-1948.
32. Guan, Z., Han, B. P., Vierstraete, A., & Dumont, H. J. (2012). Additions and refinements to the molecular phylogeny of the Calopteryginae Sl (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 41, 17-24.
33. Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In D. E. Slice (Ed.), Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology (pp. 73-98). New York: Springer.
34. Hayashi, F., Dobata, S., & Futahashi, R. (2004). Macro- and micro-scale distribution patterns of two closely related Japanese Mnais species inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA, ITS sequences and morphology (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 33, 399-412.
35. Hedenström, A., & Møller, A. P. (1992). Morphological adaptations to song flight in passerine birds: A comparative study. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 247, 183-187.
36. Hooper, R. E., Tsubaki, Y., & Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1999). Expression of a costly, plastic secondary sexual trait is correlated with age and condition in a damselfly with two male morphs. Physiological Entomology, 24, 364-369.
37. Johansson, F., Söderquist, M., & Bokma, F. (2009). Insect wing shape evolution: Independent effects of migratory and mate guarding flight on dragonfly wings. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 97, 362-372.
38. Klingenberg, C. P., & Gidaszewski, N. A. (2010). Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Systematic Biology, 59, 245-261.
39. Legagneux, P., Thery, M., Guillemain, M., Gomez, D., & Bretagnolle, V. (2010). Condition dependence of iridescent wing flash-marks in two species of dabbling ducks. Behavioural Processes, 83, 324-330.
40. Marchetti, K., Price, T., & Richman, A. (1995). Correlates of wing morphology with foraging behaviour and migration distance in the genus Phylloscopus. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 177-181.
41. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P. M., & French, V. (1997). The relationship between eyespot shape and wing shape in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: A genetic and morphometrical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 787-802.
42. Oliver, J. C., Robertson, K. A., & Monteiro, A. (2009). Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 276, 2369-2375.
43. Outomuro, D., Bokma, F., & Johansson, F. (2012). Hind wing shape evolves faster than front wing shape in Calopteryx damselflies. Evolutionary Biology, 39, 116-125.
44. Outomuro, D., & Johansson, F. (2011). The effects of latitude, body size, and sexual selection on wing shape in a damselfly. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102, 263-274.
45. Pajunen, V. I. (1966). Aggressive behaviour and territoriality in a population of Calopteryxvirgo L. (Odon., Calopterygidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 3, 201-214.
46. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2. 15. 0. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
47. Rantala, M. J., Honkavaara, J., Dunn, D. W., & Suhonen, J. (2011). Predation selects for increased immune function in male damselflies, Calopteryx splendens. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 278, 1231-1238.
48. Rantala, M. J., Koskimäki, J., Taskinen, J., Tynkkynen, K., & Suhonen, J. (2000). Immunocompetence, developmental stability and wingspot size in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens L. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 267, 2453-2457.
49. Rohlf, F. J. (2001). Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: Geometric interpretations. Evolution, 55, 2143-2160.
50. Rohlf, F. J. (2004). tpsSplin. Thin-plate spline version 1. 20. Available at: http://life. bio. sunysb. edu/morph/.
51. Rohlf, F. J. (2010a). tpsDig version 2. 16. Available at: http://life. bio. sunysb. edu/morph/.
52. Rohlf, F. J. (2010b). tpsRelw. Relative warps version 1. 49. Available at: http://life. bio. sunysb. edu/morph/.
53. Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 129-132.
54. Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40-59.
55. Rutowski, R. L., Nahm, A. C., & Macedonia, J. M. (2010). Iridescent hindwing patches in the pipevine swallowtail: Differences in dorsal and ventral surfaces relate to signal function and context. Functional Ecology, 24, 767-775.
56. Sadeghi, S., Adriaens, D., & Dumont, H. J. (2009). Geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape variation in ten European populations of Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 38, 341-357.
57. Serrano-Meneses, M. A., Córdoba-Aguilar, A., Azpilicueta-Amorín, M., González-Soriano, E., & Székely, T. (2008). Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1259-1273.
58. Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (2007). Size and shape: The developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. BioEssays, 29, 536-548.
59. Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1999). Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour, 136, 1365-1377.
60. Siva-Jothy, M. T. (2000). A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 267, 2523-2527.
61. Srygley, R. B. (1999). Locomotor mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: Contrast analyses of flight morphology and kinematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 354, 203-214.
62. Svensson, E. I., & Friberg, M. (2007). Selective predation on wing morphology in sympatric damselflies. American Naturalist, 170, 101-112.
63. Svensson, E. I., & Gosden, T. P. (2007). Contemporary evolution of secondary sexual traits in the wild. Functional Ecology, 21, 422-433.
64. Svensson, E. I., Karlsson, K., Friberg, M., & Eroukhmanoff, F. (2007). Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Current Biology, 17, 1943-1947.
65. Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731-2739.
66. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994). Clustal-W-Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680.
67. Tsubaki, Y. (2003). The genetic polymorphism linked to mate-securing strategies in the male damselfly Mnais costalis Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Population Ecology, 45, 263-266.
68. Tynkkynen, K., Rantala, M. J., & Suhonen, J. (2004). Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 759-767.
69. Waage, J. K. (1973). Reproductive behavior and its relation to territoriality in Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Behaviour, 47, 240-256.
70. Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P. (1997). Dragonfly flight. III. Lift and power requirements. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200, 583-600.
71. Weekers, P. H. H., De Jonckheere, J. F., & Dumont, H. J. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships inferred from ribosomal ITS sequences and biogeographic patterns in representatives of the genus Calopteryx (Insecta: Odonata) of the West Mediterranean and adjacent West European zone. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 89-99.
72. Wickman, P.-O. (1992). Sexual selection and butterfly design-A comparative study. Evolution, 46, 1525-1536.
73. Worthington, A. M., Berns, C. M., & Swallow, J. G. (2012). Size matters, but so does shape: Quantifying complex shape changes in a sexually selected trait in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 106, 104-113.