The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 5, 2008, Pages

  McPeek, Mark A ^a   Shen, Li ^b   Torrey, John Z ^c   Farid, Hany ^d  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Dartmouth Department of Computer Science_Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Mating structures; Morphological evolution; Punctuated change; Reproductive isolation; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DAMSELFLY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYLOGENY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; EVOLUTION; GENITALIA, MALE; INSECTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX PRESELECTION;

ENALLAGMA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 42549107026     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/587076     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arnqvist, G. 1997. The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60:365-379.
3. _. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393:784-786.
4. Arnqvist, G., M. Edvardsson, U. Friberg, and T. Nilsson. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:10460-10464.
5. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002a. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
6. _. 2002b. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56:936-947.
7. _. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
8. Bertin, A., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2005. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:949-961.
9. _. 2007. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry: a case study in Aquarius remigis. Evolution 61:825-837.
10. Besset, D. H. 2001. Object-oriented implementations of numerical methods: an introduction with Java and Smalltalk. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco.
11. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
12. Blows, M. W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:1113-1118.
13. Boake, C. R. B. 2002. Sexual signaling and speciation, a microevolutionary perspective. Genetica 116:205-214.
14. Boake, C. R. B., M. P. DeAngelis, and D. K. Andreadis. 1997. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:12442-12445.
15. Bonduriansky, R. 2007. Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61:838-849.
16. Brechbühler, C., G. Gerig, and O. Kubler. 1995. Parameterization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61:154-170.
17. Brown, J. M., M. A. McPeek, and M. L. May. 2000. A phylogenetic perspective on habitat shifts and diversity in the North American Enallagma damselflies. Systematic Biology 49:697-712.
18. Carson, H. L., and A. R. Templeton. 1984. Genetic revolutions in relations to speciation phenomena: the founding of new populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:97-131.
19. Castellano, S., and P. Cermelli. 2006. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision. Journal of Theoretical Biology 242:529-538.
20. Cordero, C., and W. G. Eberhard. 2005. Interaction between sexually antagonistic selection and mate choice in the evolution of female responses to male traits. Evolutionary Ecology 19:111-122.
21. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. 2002. Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). American Naturalist 160:594-601.
22. Córdoba-Aguilar, A., E. Uh?́a, and A. Cordero Rivera. 2003. Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals' sperm displacement. Journal of Zoology (London) 261:381-398.
23. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
24. Díaz-Uriarte, R., and T. Garland Jr. 1996. Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Systematic Biology 45:27-47.
25. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
26. _. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74:312-321.
27. Donnelly, T. W. 2004. Distribution of North American Odonata. III. Calopterygidae, Lestidae, Coenagrionidae, Protoneuridae, Platystictidae. Bulletin of American Odonatology 8:33-99.
28. Dufour, L. 1844. Anatomie générale des Dipteres. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie et Biologie Animale 1:244-264.
29. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. _. 2004. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58:1947-1970.
31. _. 2005. Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for lock-and-key and sexually antagonistic morphological coevolution hypotheses. Canadian Entomologist 137:551-565.
32. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Amererican Journal of Human Genetics 25:471-492.
33. _. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
34. Fincke, O. M. 1982. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata, Coenagrionidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10:293-302.
35. _. 1984. Sperm competition in the damselfly Enallagma hageni Walsh (Odonata: Coenagrionidae): benefits of multiple mating to males and females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14:235-240.
36. _. 1986a. Lifetime reproductive success and the opportunity for selection in a nonterritorial damselfly (Odonata, Coenagrionidae). Evolution 40:791-803.
37. _. 1986b. Underwater oviposition in a damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) favors male vigilance, and multiple mating by females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18:405-412.
38. _. 1997. Conflict resolution in the Odonata: implications for understanding female mating patterns and female choice. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60:201-220.
39. Fincke, O. M., A. Fargevieille, and T. D. Schultz. 2007. Lack of innate preference for morph and species identity in mate-searching Enallagma damselflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 1121-1131.
40. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160:712-726.
41. Garland, T., Jr. 1992. Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts. American Naturalist 140:509-519.
42. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.
43. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, and a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. American Zoologist 39:374-388.
44. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886-889.
45. _. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
46. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. B. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. American Naturalist 152:706-716.
47. Gerhardt, H. C. 2005. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms. Animal Behaviour 70:39-48.
48. Grether, G. F. 1996. Intrasexual competition alone favors a sexually dimorphic ornament in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50:1939-1948.
49. Hansen, T., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
50. Harmon, L. J., and J. B. Losos. 2005. The effect of intraspecific sample size on Type I and Type II error rates in comparative studies. Evolution 59:2705-2710.
51. Henry, C. S., M. L. M. Wells, and C. M. Simon. 1999. Convergent evolution of courtship songs among cryptic species of the Carnea group of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 53:1165-1179.
52. Hosken, D. J., and P. Stockley. 2003. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:87-93.
53. Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353-1356.
54. Howard, D. J., and S. H. Berlocher. 1998. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
55. Huber, B. A. 2003. Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact of artifact? Organisms Diversity and Evolution 3:63-71.
56. Kelly, J. K., and M. A. F. Noor. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1485-1497.
57. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female mate choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
58. _. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267: 1649-1655.
59. _. 2001. Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proceedings of the Royal B: Biological Sciences 268:1259-1263.
60. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865-884.
61. Klingenberg, C. P., and W. Ekau. 1996. A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 59:143-177.
62. Koenig, W. D. 1991. Levels of female choice in the white-tailed skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 119:193-224.
63. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
64. _. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
65. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
66. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
67. McPeek, M. A. 1990. Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71: 83-98.
68. _. 1995a. Morphological evolution mediated by behavior in the damselflies of two communities. Evolution 49:749-769.
69. _. 1995b. Testing hypotheses about evolutionary change on single branches of a phylogeny using evolutionary contrasts. American Naturalist 145:686-703.
70. _. 1998. The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecological Monographs 68:1-23.
71. _. 1999. Biochemical evolution associated with antipredator adaptation in damselflies. Evolution 53:1835-1845.
72. _. 2004. The growth/predation-risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism? American Naturalist 163:E88-E111.
73. McPeek, M. A., and J. M. Brown. 2000. Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North American waters. Ecology 81:904-920.
74. McPeek, M. A., and S. Gavrilets. 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967-1980.
75. McPeek, M. A., A. K. Schrot, and J. M. Brown. 1996. Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology 77:617-629.
76. Morrison, D. F. 2004. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
77. Mutanen, M., A. Kaitala, and M. Mönkkönen. 2006. Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypothesis. Journal of Zoology (London) 268: 109-119.
78. Noor, M. A. F., and J. L. Feder. 2006. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 7:851-861.
79. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
80. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348.
81. _. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
82. Paterson, H. E. H. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. South African Journal of Science 74:369-371.
83. _. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
84. Paulson, D. R. 1974. Reproductive isolation in damselflies. Systematic Zoology 23:40-49.
85. Payne, R. J. H., and D. C. Krakauer. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51:1-9.
86. Pfennig, K. S., and D. W. Pfennig. 2005. Character displacement as the "best of a bad situation": fitness trade-offs resulting from selection to minimize resource and mate competition. Evolution 59: 2200-2208.
87. Phelps, S. M., S. A. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2006. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. American Naturalist 167:28-42.
88. Polihronakis, M. 2006. Morphological analysis of intraspecific shape variation in male and female genitalia of Phillophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99:144-150.
89. Purvis, A., and T. Garland Jr. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Systematic Biology 42:569-575.
90. Randler, C. 2002. Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Animal Behaviour 63:103-119.
91. Regan, J. L., L. M. Meffert, and E. H. Bryant. 2003. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:302-312.
92. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostern. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-1653.
93. Ritchie, D. W., and G. J. Kemp. 1999. Fast computation, rotation, and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. Journal of Computational Chemistry 20:383-395.
94. Robertson, H. M., and H. E. H. Paterson. 1982. Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36:243-250.
95. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
96. Shapiro, A. M., and A. H. Porter. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:231-245.
97. Shaw, K. L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preferences in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54:1303-1312.
98. Shen, L., and F. Makedon. 2006. Spherical mapping for processing of 3-D closed surfaces. Image and Vision Computing 24:743-761.
99. Shen, L., H. Huang, F. Makdeon, and A. J. Saykin. 2007. Efficient registration of 3D SPHARM surfaces. Pages 81-88 in Canadian Image Processing and Pattern Recognition Society. Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.
100. Springer, S. A., and B. J. Crespi. 2007. Adaptive gamete-recognition divergence in a hybridizing Mytilus population. Evolution 61:772-783.
101. Stoks, R. 2000. Components of lifetime mating success and body size in males of a scrambling damselfly. Animal Behaviour 59:339-348.
102. Stoks, R., and M. A. McPeek. 2006. A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. American Naturalist 168(suppl.):S50-S72.
103. Stoks, R., M. A. McPeek, and J. L. Mitchell. 2003. The evolution of anti-predator behavior as lineages adapt to different habitats: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57:574-585.
104. Stoks, R., J. L. Nystrom, M. L. May, and M. A. McPeek. 2005. Parallel evolution in ecological and reproductive traits to produce cryptic damselfly species across the Holarctic. Evolution 59:1976-1988.
105. Sved, J. A. 1981a. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. Genetics 97:197-215.
106. _. 1981b. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. II. Computer simulation of experimental selection procedure. Genetics 97:217-235.
107. Svensson, E. I., F. Eroukhmanoff, and M. Friberg. 2006. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 60:1242-1253.
108. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier. 2002. Reproductive protein evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:161-179.
109. Templeton, A. R. 1979. Once again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33:513-517.
110. Turgeon, J., R. Stoks, R. A. Thum, J. M. Brown, and M. A. McPeek. 2005. Simultaneous Quaternary radiations of three damselfly clades across the Holarctic. American Naturalist 165:E78-E107.
111. Waage, J. K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916-918.
112. Westfall, M. J., and M. L. May. 2006. Damselflies of North America. 2nd ed. Scientific, Gainesville, FL.
113. Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Animal Behaviour 58:1-12.