An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1247-1262

  Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^a   De SanT'Ana, Carlos Eduardo Ramos ^b   Bini, Luis Mauricio ^a  

^a Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas   (Brazil)

^b Escolo Technica Fed de Goias   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Body size; Comparative methods; Multiple regression; Phylogenetic autocorrelation; Phylogenetic inertia; Principal coordinate analysis

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUE; INERTIA; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANIMALIA; CARNIVORA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 3643135272     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02006.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. BAUWENS, D., AND R. DÍAS-URIARTE. 1997. Covariation of life-history traits in lacertid lizards: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 149:91-111.
2. BELL, G. 1989. A comparative method. Am. Nat. 133:553-571.
3. BROOKS, D. R., AND D. H. MCLENNAN. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology and behavior: a research program in comparative biology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. BROWN, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. CHEVERUD, J. M., AND M. M. Dow. 1985. An autocorrelation analysis of genetic variation due to lineal fission in social groups of Rhesus Macaques. Am. J. Physic. Anthropol. 67:113-121.
6. CHEVERUD, J. M., M. M. Dow, AND W. LEUTENEGGER. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
7. CHRISTMAN, M. C., R. W. JERNIGAM, AND D. CULVER. 1997. A comparison of two models for estimating phylogenetic effect on trait variation. Evolution 51:262-266.
8. COLLESS, D. H. 1982. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics II. Syst. Zool. 31:100-104.
9. COLLINS, T. M., K. FRAZER, A. R. PALMER, G. J. VERMEIJ, AND W. M. BROWN. 1996. Evolutionary history of northern hemisphere Nucella (Gastropoda: Muricidae): molecular, morphological, ecological and paleontological evidence. Evolution 50:2287-2304.
10. DOUGLAS, M. E., AND W. J. MATTHEW. 1992. Does morphology predict ecology? Hypothesis testing within a freshwater stream fish assemblage. Oikos 65:213-224.
11. DOBLER, S., P. MARDULYN, J. M. PASTEELS, AND M. ROWELL-RAHIER. 1996. Host-plant switches and the evolution of chemical defense and life-history in the leaf beetle genus Oreina. Evolution 50:2373-2386.
12. DUNNING, J. S. 1987. South American birds. Harrowood Books, Newton Square, PA.
13. EDWARDS, S. V., AND M. KOT. 1995. Comparative methods at the species level: geographic variation in morphology and group size in grey-crowned babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis). Evolution 49:1134-1146.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
15. _. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
16. FONSECA, G. A. B., G. HERRMANN, Y. L. R. LEITE, R. A. MITTER-MEIER, A. RYLANDS, AND J. L. PATTON. 1996. Lista anotada de mamiferos do Brasil. Occ. Pap. Conserv. Biol. 4:1-38.
17. GARLAND, T., JR., P. H. HARVEY, AND A. R. IVES. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. System. Biol. 41(1):18-32.
18. GARLAND, T., JR., A. W. DICKERMAN, C. M. JANIS, AND A. A. JONES. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42(3):265-292.
19. GEFFEN, E., M. E. GOMPPER, J. L. GITTLEMAN, H.-K. LUH, D. W. MACDONALD, AND R. K. WAYNE. 1996. Size, life-history traits and social organization in the canidae: a reevaluation. Am. Nat. 147:140-160.
20. GITTLEMAN, J. L., AND M. KOT. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39:227-241.
21. GITTLEMAN, J. L., AND H.-K. LUH. 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:383-404.
22. GITTLEMAN, J. L., C. G. ANDERSON, M. KOT, AND H.-K. LUH. 1996. Phylogenetic lability and rates of evolution: a comparison of behavioral, morphological and life history traits. Pp. 166-205 in E. P Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
23. GOTELLI, N. G., AND M. PYRON. 1991. Life history variation in North American freshwater minnows: effects of latitude and phylogeny. Oikos 62:30-40.
24. GOWER, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
25. GRAFEN, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philo. Trans. R, Soc. B Biol. Sci. 326:157-199.
26. GRANTHAM, T. A. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to macroevolution: recent work on species selection and the "effect hypothesis." Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:301-321.
27. HANSEN, T. F., AND E. P. MARTINS. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
28. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
29. HARVEY, P. H., AND A. PURVIS. 1991. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351:619-624.
30. HEARD, S. B. 1992. Patterns in tree balance among cladistic, phenetic, and randomly generated phylogenetic trees. Evolution 46:1818-1826.
31. HUBERT, L. J. 1983. Inference procedures for the evaluation and comparison of proximity matrices. Pp. 209-228 in J. Felsenstein, ed. Numerical taxonomy. NATO Series. Springer, New York.
32. HUBERT, L. J., R. G. GOLLEDGE, AND C. M. CONSTANZO. 1981. Generalized procedures for evaluating spatial autocorrelation. Geogr. Anal. 13:224-233.
33. IRWIN, R. E. 1994, The evolution of plumage dichromatism in the new world blackbirds: social selection on female brightness? Am. Nat. 144:890-907.
34. JACKSON, D. A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal component analysis : a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204-2214.
35. KRUSKAL, J. B. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1-27.
36. _. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:28-42.
37. 2. Am. Stat. 39:279-285.
38. LEGENDRE, P., F.-J. LAPOINTE, AND P. CASGRAIN. 1994. Modelling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
39. LEROI, A. M., M. R. ROSE, AND G. V. LAUDER. 1991. What does the comparative method reveal about adaptations. Am. Nat. 149:381-402.
40. LYNCH, M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080.
41. MARTINS, E. P. 1993. A comparative study of the evolution of Sceloporus push-up displays. Am. Nat. 142:994-1018.
42. _. 1994. Estimating rates of character change from comparative data. Am. Nat. 144:193-209.
43. _. 1995. Phylogenies and comparative data: a microevolutionary perspective. Philo. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 349:85-91.
44. _. 1996a. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50:1750-1765.
45. _. 1996b. COMPARE: statistical analysis of comparative data. Vers. 1.1. Distributed by the author. Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
46. MARTINS, E. P., AND T. GARLAND JR. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
47. MARTINS, E. P., AND T. F. HANSEN. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. Pp. 22-75 in E. P. Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
48. _. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
49. MILES, D. B., AND A. E. DUNHAM. 1993. Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: the use of phylogenetic comparative analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:587-619.
50. _. 1996. The paradox of phylogeny: character displacement of analysis of body size in island Anolis. Evolution 50:594-603.
51. ODEN, N. L. 1984. Assessing the significance of a spatial correlogram. Geogr. Anal. 16:1-16.
52. PETERS, R. H. 1983. The ecological significance of body size. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
53. PHILIPPI, T. E. 1993. Multiple regression: herbivory. Pp. 183-210 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiment. Chapman and Hall, New York.
54. PIGNATA, M. I. B., AND J. A. F. DINIZ-FILHO. 1996. Phylogenetic autocorrelation and evolutionary constraints in worker body size of some neotropical stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Heredity 76:222-228.
55. PURVIS, A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philo. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 348:405-421.
56. PURVIS, A., J. L. GITTLEMAN, AND H.-K. LUH. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167:293-300.
57. RICHMAN, A. D. 1996. Ecological diversification and community structure in the old word leaf warblers (genus Phylloscopus): a phylogenetic perspective. Evolution 50:2461-2470.
58. RICKLEFS, R. E., AND D. SCHLUTER. 1993. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
59. ROHLF, F. J. 1972. An empirical comparison of three ordination techniques in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 21:271-280.
60. _. 1981. Spatial representation of phylogenetic trees computed from dissimilarity matrices. Int. Symp. Concepts Meth. Paleobiol. 303-311.
61. _. 1989. NTSYS: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter, New York.
62. SCHLUTER, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
63. SIBLEY, C. G., AND J. E. AHLQUIST. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
64. SNEATH, P. H. A., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
65. SOKAL, R. R., AND G. M. JACQUEZ. 1991. Testing inferences about microevolutonary processes by means of spatial autocorrelation analysis. Evolution 45:152-168.
66. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry. 3d ed. Freeman, New York.
67. SOKAL, R. R., N. L. ODEN, AND B. A. THOMSON. 1997. A simulation study of microevolutionary inferences by spatial autocorrelation analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:73-93.
68. STEARNS, S. G. 1983. The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals. Oikos 41:173-187.
69. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND G. J. OLSEN. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pp. 411-501 in D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds. Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
70. TAYLOR, C. M., AND N. J. GOTELLI. 1994. The macroecology of Cyprinella: correlates of phylogeny, body size and geographical range. Am. Nat. 144:549-569.
71. WEATHERHEAD, T. J., AND K. L. TEATHER. 1994. Sexual dimorphism and egg-size allometry in birds. Evolution 48:671-678.
72. WILKINSON, L. 1989. SYSTAT/SYGRAPH: the system for statistics. Systat. Inc., Evanston, IL.