Phylogenetic principal components analysis and geometric morphometrics

Hystrix

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  David Polly, P ^a   Michelle Lawing, A ^a   Fabre, Anne Claire ^b,c   Goswami, Anjali ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Comparative phylogenetic methods; Geometric morphometrics; Phylogenetic principal component analysis; Shape analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874927293     PISSN: 03941914     EISSN: 18255272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6383     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackerly D.D., Donoghue M.J., 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometery, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am. Nat. 152: 767-791.
2. Adams D.C., Collyer M.L., 2009. A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution 63: 1143-1154.
3. Bergmann P.J., Berk C.P., 2012. The evolution of positive allometry of weaponry in horned lizards (Phrynosoma). Evol. Biol. 39: 311-323.
4. Bookstein F.L., 1997a. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
5. Bookstein F.L., 1997b. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 3: 225-243.
6. Bookstein F.L., Green W.D.K., 2002. Users Manual, EWSH3.19. Available at http://brainmap.stat.washington.edu/edgewarp/
7. Coddington J.A., 1988. Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4: 3-22.
8. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley: Chichester, UK.
9. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C., 1996. Quantitative Genetics. Benjamin Cummings: San Francisco, California.
10. Felsenstein J., 1973. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Human Genet. 25: 471-492.
11. Felsenstein J., 2003. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. Felsenstein J., 2009. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6.9. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington: Seattle.
13. Foote M., Miller A.I., 2007. Principles of Paleontology. W.H. Freeman: New York.
14. Goswami A., Polly P.D., 2010. Methods for studying morphological integration, modularity and covariance evolution. In: Alroy J., Hunt G. (Eds.). Quantitative Methods in Paleo-biology. Paleontological Society Short Course. The Paleontological Society Papers 16: 213-243.
15. Gould S.J., Vrba E.S., 1982. Expatation - a missing term in the science of form. Paleobio-logy 8: 4-15.
16. Greene H.W., 1986. Diet and arboreality in the Emerald Monitor, Varanus prasinus, with comments on the study of adaptation. Fieldiana Zool. 31: 1-12.
17. Gunz P., Mitteroecker P., Bookstein F.L., 2005. Semi-landmarks in three dimensions. In: Slice D. (Ed.). Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York.
18. nd Edition. Springer: New York.
19. Klingenberg C.P., Gidaszewski N.A., 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syste. Biol. 59: 245-261.
20. Kluge A.G., 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38: 7-25.
21. Kohlsdorf T., Navas C., 2012. Evolution of form and function: morphophysiological relationships and locomotor performance in tropidurine lizards. J. Zool. 288: 41-49.
22. Lynch M., Walsh B., 1998. Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts.
23. Maddison W.P., 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Biol. 40: 304-314.
24. Martins E.P., Hansen T.F., 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of inter specific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646-667.
25. Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Bernhard M., Schaefer K., Bookstein F.L., 2004. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J. Human Evol. 46: 679-698.
26. Nyakatura K., Bininda-Edmonds O.R.P., 2012. Updating the evolutionary history of Carni-vora (Mammalia): a new species-level supertree complete with divergence time estimates. BMC Biology 10: 12.
27. Pavlicev M., Cheverud J.M., Wagner G.P., 2009. Measuring morphological integration using eigenvalue variance. Evol. Biol. 36: 157-170.
28. Polly P.D., 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontol. Electronica 7.2.7A: 1-28.
29. Polly P.D., 2008. Adaptive Zones and the Pinniped Ankle: A 3D Quantitative Analysis of Carnivoran Tarsal Evolution. In: Sargis E., Dagosto M. (Eds.). Mammalian Evolutionary Morphology: A Tribute to Frederick S. Szalay. Springer, Dordrecht: The Netherlands. 165-194.
30. Polly P.D., 2012a. Geometric morphometrics for Mathematica. Version 9.0. Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. Available from: http://mypage.iu.edu/~pdpolly/Software.html.
31. Polly P.D., 2012b. Phylogenetics for Mathematica. Version 2.1. Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. Available from: http://mypage.iu.edu/~pdpolly/Software.html.
32. Revell L.J., 2009. Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63: 3258-3268.
33. Rohlf F.J., 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Marcus L.F, Bello E., Garcia Valdecasas A. (Eds.). Contributions to Morpho-metrics. Museo National de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. 131-159.
34. Rohlf F.J., 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 47: 147-158.
35. Rohlf F.J., 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16: 197-223.
36. Rohlf F.J., 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143-2160.
37. Rohlf F.J., 2002. Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny. In: MacLeod N., Forey P.L. (Eds.). Morphology, Shape, and Phylogeny. Taylor and Francis: London. 175-193.
38. Rohlf F.J., 2003. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. J. Human Evol. 44: 665-683.
39. Rohlf F.J., Slice D., 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superim-position of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 40-59.
40. Schluter D., Price T., Mooers A.Ø., Ludwig D., 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699-1711.
41. Souter T., Cornette R., Pedraza J., Hutchinson J.R, Baylac M., 2010. Two applications of 3D semi-landmark morphometrics implying different template designs: the theropod pelvis and the shrew skull. C. R. Palevol 9: 411-422.
42. Westoby M., Leishman M.R., Lord J.M., 1995. On misinterpreting the "phylogenetic correction". J. Ecol. 83: 531-534.
43. Wiley D.F., Amenta N., Alcantara D.A., Ghosh D., Kil Y.J., Delson E., Harcourt-Smith W., Rohlf F.J., St John K., Hamann B., 2005. Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005 (VIS'05), 23-28 October 2005, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
44. Zelditch M.L., Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D., Fink W.L., 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, California.