The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean anolis lizards

Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 259-272

  Butler, Marguerite A ^a,b   Schoener, Thomas W ^c   Losos, Jonathan B ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Anolis lizards; ANOVA; Body size; Comparative methods; Phylogenetic effect; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HABITAT USE; LIZARD; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SIZE AT MATURITY;

CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; GREATER ANTILLES;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ANOLIS; REPTILIA; SQUAMATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0034108793     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00026.x     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Andrews, R. M. 1971. Structural habitat and time budget of a tropical Anolis lizard. Ecology 52:262-271.
2. _. 1976. Growth rates in island and mainland anoline lizards. Copeia 1976:477-482.
3. _. 1979. Evolution of life histories: a comparison of Anolis lizards from matched island and mainland habitats. Breviora 454: 1-51.
4. _. 1982. Patterns of growth in reptiles. Pp. 273-320 in C. Gans and F. H. Pough, eds. Biology of the reptilia. Vol. 12. Academic Press, New York.
5. _. 1985. Mate choice by females of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J. Herpetol. 19:284-289.
6. Bernstein, I. H. 1987. Applied multivariate analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Björklund, M. 1990. A phylogenetic interpretation of sexual dimorphism in body size and ornament in relation to mating systems in birds. J. Evol. Biol. 3:171-183.
8. Butler, M. A., and J. B. Losos. 1997. Testing for unequal amounts of evolution in a continuous character on different branches of a phylogenetic tree using linear and squared-change parsimony: an example using Lesser Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 51: 1623-1635.
9. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
10. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London.
11. _. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
12. Ely, J., and A. Kurland. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation, phylogenetic constraints, and the causes of sexual dimorphism in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 10:151-171.
13. Fairbairn, D. J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:659-687.
14. Fairbairn, D. J., and R. F. Preziosi. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Am. Nat. 144:101-118
15. Fairbairn, J., and R. Shine. 1993. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in seabirds of the Southern Hemisphere. Oikos 68:139-145.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet 25: 471-492.
17. _. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
18. _. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998:445-471.
19. Ford, S. M. 1994. Evolution of sexual dimorphism body weight in platyrrhines. Am. J. Primatol. 34:221-244.
20. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
21. Gaulin, S. J. C., and L. D. Sailer. 1984. Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. Int. J. Primatol. 5:515-535.
22. _. 1985. Are females the ecological sex? Am. Anthropol. 87: 111-119.
23. Geist, V. 1977. A comparison of social adaptations in relation to ecology in gallinaceous bird and ungulate societies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8:193-207.
24. Geist, V., and M. Bayer. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in the Cervidae and its relation to habitat. J. Zool. 214:45-53.
25. Gordon, R. E. 1956. The biology and biodemography of Anolis carolinensis Voight. Ph.D. diss., Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
26. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 326:119-257.
27. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
28. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50: 1404-1417.
29. Hass, C. A., S. B. Hedges, and L. R. Maxson. 1993. Molecular insights into the relationships and biogeography of West Indian anoline lizards. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21:97-114.
30. Hicks, R., and R. Trivers. 1983. The social behavior of Anolis valencienni. Pp. 570-595 in A. G. J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, eds., Advances in herpetology and evolutionary biology: essays in honor of Ernest E. Williams. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
31. Höglund, J. 1989. Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds: a comparative analysis. Am. Nat. 134:72-87.
32. Hollander, M., and D. A. Wolfe. 1973. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley, New York.
33. Huey, R. B., and A. F. Bennett. 1987. Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation: preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperatures of lizards. Evolution 41:1098-1115.
34. Jackman, T. R., J. B. Losos, A. Larson, and K. de Queiroz. 1997. Phylogenetic studies of convergent adaptive radiation in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Pp. 535-557 in T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma, eds. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Jackman, T. R., A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and J. B. Losos. 1999. Phylogenetics and the tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Syst. Biol. 48:254-285.
36. Jarman, P. 1974. The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:216-269.
37. Leutenegger, W., and J. M. Cheverud. 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: ecological and size variables. Int. J. Primatol. 3:387-402.
38. Losos, J. B. 1990a. Concordant evolution of locomotor behavior, display rate and morphology in Anolis lizards. Anim. Behav. 39: 879-890.
39. _. 1990b. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 60:369-388.
40. _. 1990c. The evolution of form and function: morphology and locomotor performance in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 44:1189-1203.
41. _. 1992. The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anolis communities. Syst. Biol. 41:403-420.
42. _. 1994. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 467-493.
43. Losos, J. B., T. R. Jackman, A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and L. Rodriguez-Schettino. 1998. Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279: 2115-2118.
44. Martins, E. P. 1994. Estimate the rate of phenotypic evolution from comparative data. Am. Nat. 144:193-209.
45. _. 1995. COMPARE: statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
46. _. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression, and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50: 1750-1765.
47. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
48. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. Pp. 22-75 in E. P. Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
49. _. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
50. Moermond, T. C. 1979a. Habitat constraints on the behavior, morphology, and community structure of Anolis lizards. Ecology 60: 152-164.
51. _. 1979b. The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behavior. Behaviour 70:147-167.
52. Pounds, J. 1988. Ecomorphology, locomotion, and microhabitat structure: patterns in a tropical mainland Anolis community. Ecol. Monogr. 58:299-320.
53. Pyron, M. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and phylogeny in North American minnows. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 57:327-341.
54. Rand, A. S. 1964. Ecological distribution in anoline lizards of Puerto Rico. Ecology 45:745-752.
55. _. 1967a. Ecology and social organization in the iguanid lizard Anolis lineatopus. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 122:1-79.
56. _. 1967b. The ecological distribution of the anoline lizards around Kingston, Jamaica. Breviora 272:1-18.
57. Rao, C. R. 1965. Linear statistical inference and its applications. John Wiley, New York.
58. Reiss, M. J. 1989. The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
60. Ruby, D. 1984. Male breeding success and differential access to females in Anolis carolinensis. Herpetologica 40:272-280.
61. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide. Vol. 1, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
62. Schoener, T. W. 1967. The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155: 474-476.
63. _. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704-726.
64. _. 1969a. Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. I. Size and species diversity. Syst. Biol. 18:386-401.
65. _. 1969b. Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am. Nat. 103:277-313.
66. _. 1970a. Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Correlations with the sizes of particular sympatric species - displacement and convergence. Am. Nat. 104:155-174.
67. _. 1970b. Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408-418.
68. _. 1975. Presence and absence of habitat shift in some widespread lizard species. Ecol. Monogr. 45:233-258.
69. _. 1977. Competition and the niche. Pp. 35-136 in C. Gans and D. Tinkle, eds. Biology of the reptilia. Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York.
70. _. 1979. Feeding, spacing, and growth in the four species of Bimini Anolis lizards. Pp. 479-485 in National Geographic Society research reports: 1970 projects. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
71. Schoener, T. W., and G. C. Gorman. 1968. Some niche differences in three Lesser Antillean lizards of the genus Anolis. Ecology 49:819-830.
72. Schoener, T. W., and A. Schoener. 1971a. Structural habitats of West Indian Anolis lizards. I. Lowland Jamaica. Breviora 368: 1-53.
73. _. 1971b. Structural habitats of West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Puerto Rican uplands. Breviora 375:1-39.
74. _. 1980. Densities, sex ratios, and population structure in four species of Bahamian Anolis lizards. J. Anim. Ecol. 49:19-53.
75. _. 1982a. Intraspecific variation in home-range size in some Anolis lizards. Ecology 63:809-823.
76. _. 1982b. The ecological correlates of survival in some Bahamian Anolis lizards. Oikos 39:1-16.
77. Scott, N. J., D. E. Wilson, C. Jones, and R. M. Andrews. 1976. The choice of perch diameters by lizards of the genus Anolis (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). J. Herpetol. 10:75-84.
78. Selander, R. K. 1966. Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113-151.
79. _. 1972. Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. Pp. 180-230 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL.
80. Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Quart. Rev. Biol. 64: 419-461.
81. _. 1991. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am. Nat. 138:103-122.
82. Slatkin, M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622-630.
83. Stamps, J. A. 1977a. The relationship between resource competition, risk and aggression in a tropical territorial lizard. Ecology 58:349-358.
84. _. 1977b. Social behavior and spacing patterns in lizards. Pp. 256-334 in C. Gans and D. Tinkle, eds. Biology of the reptilia. Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York.
85. _. 1983. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. Pp. 169-204 in R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener, eds. Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
86. _. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth after maturity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 50:123-145.
87. _. 1995. Using growth-based models to study behavioral factors affecting sexual size dimorphism. Herpetol. Monogr. 9: 75-87.
88. Stamps, J. A., and R. M. Andrews. 1992. Estimating asymptotic size using the largest individuals per sample. Oecologia 92: 503-512.
89. Stamps, J. A., and V. V. Krishnan. 1997. Sexual bimaturation and sexual size dimorphism in animals with asymptotic growth after maturity. Evol. Ecol. 11:21-39.
90. Stamps, J. A., V. V. Krishnan, and R. M. Andrews. 1994. Analyses of sexual size dimorphism using null growth-based models. Copeia 1994:598-613.
91. Stamps, J. A., J. B. Losos, and R. M. Andrews. 1997. A comparative study of population density and sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Am. Nat. 149:64-90.
92. Taper, M. L., and T. J. Case. 1992. Coevolution among competitors. Pp. 63-109 in J. Antonovics and D. J. Futuyma, eds. Oxford survey evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
93. Tokarz, R. R. 1985. Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Anim. Behav. 33:746-753.
94. Trivers, R. 1976. Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution 30:253-269.
95. Williams, E. E. 1969. The ecology of colonization as seen in the zoogeography of anoline lizards on small islands. Quart. Rev. Biol. 44:345-389.
96. _. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: a trial analysis. Evol. Biol. 6:47-89.
97. _. 1983. Ecomorphs, faunas, island size, and diverse end points in island radiations of Anolis. Pp. 326-370 in R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener, eds. Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
98. Willig, M. R., and R. R. Hollander. 1995. Secondary sexual dimorphism and phylogenetic constraints in bats: a multivariate approach. J. Mammal. 76:981-992.
99. Zamudio, K. R. 1998. The evolution of female-biased sexual size dimorphism: a population-level comparative study in horned lizards (Phrynosoma). Evolution 52:1821-1833.
100. Zeh, D. W. 1987. Aggression, density, and sexual dimorphism in chernetid pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpionida). Evolution 41:1072-1087.