Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution

American Naturalist

Volumn 164, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 683-695

  Butler, Marguerite A ^a   King, Aaron A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Anolis lizards; Brownian motion; Evolutionary model; Ornstein Uhlenbeck; Selective regime

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; MODELING; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANOLIS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 11944264347     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/426002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baum, D. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. A likelihood framework for the phylogenetic analysis of adaptation. Pages 24-44 in S. H. Orzack and E. Sober, eds. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
3. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2d ed. Springer, New York.
4. Butler, M. A., and J. B. Losos. 1997. Testing for unequal amounts of evolution in a continuous character on different branches of a phylogenetic tree using linear and squared-change parsimony: an example using Lesser Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 51:1623-1635.
5. Butler, M. A., T. W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272.
6. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body-weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
7. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
8. _. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:445-471.
9. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160:712-726.
10. Frumhoff, P. C., and H. K. Reeve. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180.
11. Garland, T., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.
12. Garland, T., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42:265-292.
13. Gittleman, J. L., and M. Kot. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Systematic Zoology 39:227-241.
14. Gorman, G. C., and Y. J. Kim. 1976. Anolis lizards of eastern Caribbean: a case-study in evolution. II. Genetic relationships and genetic variation of bimaculatus group. Systematic Zoology 25:62-77.
15. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 326:119-157.
16. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
17. Hansen, T. F., W. S. Armbruster, and L. Antonsen. 2000. Comparative analysis of character displacement and spatial adaptations as illustrated by the evolution of Dalechampia blossoms. American Naturalist 156(suppl):S17-S34.
18. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 1. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Harvey, P. H., and A. Purvis. 1991. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351:619-624.
20. Harvey, P. H., and A. Rambaut. 2000. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355:1599-1605.
21. Huey, R. B., and A. F. Bennett. 1987. Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation: preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperatures of lizards. Evolution 41:1098-1115.
22. Jackman, T. R., J. B. Losos, A. Larson, and K. de Queiroz. 1997. Phylogenetic studies of convergent adaptive radiation in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Pages 535-557 in T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma, eds. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Jackman, T. R., A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and J. B. Losos. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Systematic Biology 48:254-285.
24. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
25. _. 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. American Naturalist 116:463-479.
26. Lazell, J. D. 1972. The anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae) of the Lesser Antilles. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 143:1-115.
27. Losos, J. B. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of character displacement in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Evolution 44:558-569.
28. _. 1994. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:467-493.
29. Maddison, W. P. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Systematic Zoology 40:304-314.
30. Martins, E. P. 1996. Conducting phylogenetic comparative studies when the phylogeny is not known. Evolution 50:12-22.
31. _. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:296-299.
32. _. 2004. COMPARE. Version 4.6. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/.
33. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
34. Martins, E. P., J. A. F. Diniz, and E. A. Housworth. 2002. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56:1-13.
35. Miles, D. B., and A. E. Dunham. 1993. Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: the use of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:587-619.
36. _. 1996. The paradox of the phylogeny: character displacement and analyses of body size in island Anolis. Evolution 50:594-603.
37. Mooers, A. O., S. M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 1999. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). American Naturalist 154:249-259.
38. Oakley, T. H., and C. W. Cunningham. 2000. Independent contrasts succeed where ancestor reconstruction fails in known bacteriophage phylogeny. Evolution 54:397-405.
39. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348.
40. Polly, P. D. 2001. Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values. American Naturalist 157:596-609.
41. Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352:519-529.
42. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. O. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
43. Schneider, C. J., J. B. Losos, and K. De Queiroz. 2001. Evolutionary relationships of the Anolis bimaculatus group from the northern Lesser Antilles. Journal of Herpetology 35:1-12.
44. Schoener, T. W. 1970. Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Correlations with the sizes of particular sympatric species: displacement and convergence. American Naturalist 104:155-174.
45. Schwenk, K., and G. P. Wagner. 2001. Function and the evolution of phenotypic stability: connecting pattern to process. American Zoologist 41:552-563.
46. Stenson, A. G., R. S. Thorpe, and A. Malhotra. 2004. Evolutionary differentiation of bimaculatus group anoles based on analyses of mtDNA and microsatellite data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32:1-10.
47. Webster, A. J., and A. Purvis. 2002. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:143-149.
48. Westoby, M., M. R. Leishman, and J. M. Lord. 1995. On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction. Journal of Ecology 83:531-534.
49. Williams, E. E. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: a trial analysis. Evolutionary Biology 6:47-89.