Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation

Frontiers in Genetics

Volumn 5, Issue AUG, 2014, Pages

  Nishi, Hafumi ^a   Shaytan, Alexey ^b   Panchenko, Anna R ^b  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Allosteric regulation; Multisite phosphorylation; Protein disorder; Protein phosphorylation; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

PROLINE;

ALLOSTERISM; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HUMAN; ISOMERIZATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84906266951     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16648021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00270     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Barr, D., Oashi, T., Burkhard, K., Lucius, S., Samadani, R., Zhang, J.,et al. (2011). Importance of domain closure for the autoactivation of ERK2. Biochemistry 50, 8038-8048. doi: 10.1021/bi200503a
2. Beltrao, P., Albanese, V., Kenner, L. R., Swaney, D. L., Burlingame, A., Villen, J.,et al. (2012). Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell 150, 413-425. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.036
3. Beltrao, P., Bork, P., Krogan, N. J., and Van Noort, V. (2013). Evolution and functional cross-talk of protein post-translational modifications. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 714. doi: 10.1002/msb.201304521
4. Bogan, A. A., and Thorn, K. S. (1998). Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280, 1-9. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843
5. Bozoky, Z., Krzeminski, M., Chong, P. A., and Forman-Kay, J. D. (2013). Structural changes of CFTR R region upon phosphorylation: a plastic platform for intramolecular and intermolecular interactions. FEBS J. 280, 4407-4416. doi: 10.1111/febs.12422
6. Burke, J. R., Deshong, A. J., Pelton, J. G., and Rubin, S. M. (2010). Phosphorylation-induced conformational changes in the retinoblastoma protein inhibit E2F transactivation domain binding. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16286-16293. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.108167
7. Burke, J. R., Hura, G. L., and Rubin, S. M. (2012). Structures of inactive retinoblastoma protein reveal multiple mechanisms for cell cycle control. Genes Dev. 26, 1156-1166. doi: 10.1101/gad.189837.112
8. Burke, J. R., Liban, T. J., Restrepo, T., Lee, H. W., and Rubin, S. M. (2014). Multiple mechanisms for E2F binding inhibition by phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein C-terminal domain. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.031
9. Cesaro, L., Marin, O., Venerando, A., Donella-Deana, A., and Pinna, L. A. (2013). Phosphorylation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) serine-511 by the combined action of tyrosine kinases and CK2: the implication of tyrosine-512 and phenylalanine-508. Amino Acids 45, 1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1613-y
10. Chacko, B. M., Qin, B., Correia, J. J., Lam, S. S., De Caestecker, M. P., and Lin, K. (2001). The L3 loop and C-terminal phosphorylation jointly define Smad protein trimerization. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 248-253. doi: 10.1038/84995
11. Dou, H., Buetow, L., Hock, A., Sibbet, G. J., Vousden, K. H., and Huang, D. T. (2012). Structural basis for autoinhibition and phosphorylation-dependent activation of c-Cbl. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 184-192. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2231
12. Durocher, D., Taylor, I. A., Sarbassova, D., Haire, L. F., Westcott, S. L., Jackson, S. P.,et al. (2000). The molecular basis of FHA domain: phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol. Cell. 6, 1169-1182. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00114-3
13. Espinoza-Fonseca, L. M., Kast, D., and Thomas, D. D. (2007). Molecular dynamics simulations reveal a disorder-to-order transition on phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin. Biophys. J. 93, 2083-2090. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.095802
14. Espinoza-Fonseca, L. M., Kast, D., and Thomas, D. D. (2008). Thermodynamic and structural basis of phosphorylation-induced disorder-to-order transition in the regulatory light chain of smooth muscle myosin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 12208-12209. doi: 10.1021/ja803143g
15. Ferreon, J. C., Lee, C. W., Arai, M., Martinez-Yamout, M. A., Dyson, H. J., and Wright, P. E. (2009). Cooperative regulation of p53 by modulation of ternary complex formation with CBP/p300 and HDM2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 6591-6596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811023106
16. Fong, J. H., and Panchenko, A. R. (2010). Intrinsic disorder and protein multibinding in domain, terminal, and linker regions. Mol. Biosyst. 6, 1821-1828. doi: 10.1039/c005144f
17. Freschi, L., Osseni, M., and Landry, C. R. (2014). Functional divergence and evolutionary turnover in mammalian phosphoproteomes. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004062
18. Furdui, C. M., Lew, E. D., Schlessinger, J., and Anderson, K. S. (2006). Autophosphorylation of FGFR1 kinase is mediated by a sequential and precisely ordered reaction. Mol. Cell 21, 711-717. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.022
19. Gajadhar, A. S., and White, F. M. (2014). System level dynamics of post-translational modifications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 28C, 83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.009
20. Gascoigne, K. E., Takeuchi, K., Suzuki, A., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T., and Cheeseman, I. M. (2011). Induced ectopic kinetochore assembly bypasses the requirement for CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 145, 410-422. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.031
21. Groban, E. S., Narayanan, A., and Jacobson, M. P. (2006). Conformational changes in protein loops and helices induced by post-translational phosphorylation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2:e32. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020032
22. Hamelberg, D., Shen, T., and Mccammon, J. A. (2005). Phosphorylation effects on cis/trans isomerization and the backbone conformation of serine-proline motifs: accelerated molecular dynamics analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1969-1974. doi: 10.1021/ja0446707
23. Hashimoto, K., Nishi, H., Bryant, S., and Panchenko, A. R. (2011). Caught in self-interaction: evolutionary and functional mechanisms of protein homooligomerization. Phys. Biol. 8, 035007. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/3/035007
24. Hassler, M., Singh, S., Yue, W. W., Luczynski, M., Lakbir, R., Sanchez-Sanchez, F.,et al. (2007). Crystal structure of the retinoblastoma protein N domain provides insight into tumor suppression, ligand interaction, and holoprotein architecture. Mol. Cell. 28, 371-385. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.023
25. Hubbard, S. R., and Miller, W. T. (2007). Receptor tyrosine kinases: mechanisms of activation and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 19, 117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.010
26. Huse, M., and Kuriyan, J. (2002). The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 109, 275-282. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00741-9
27. Iakoucheva, L. M., Radivojac, P., Brown, C. J., O'Connor, T. R., Sikes, J. G., Obradovic, Z.,et al. (2004). The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1037-1049. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh253
28. Jia-Lin Ma, N., and Stern, D. F. (2008). Regulation of the Rad53 protein kinase in signal amplification by oligomer assembly and disassembly. Cell Cycle 7, 808-817. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.6.5595
29. Johnson, C., Crowther, S., Stafford, M. J., Campbell, D. G., Toth, R., and Mackintosh, C. (2010). Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites. Biochem. J. 427, 69-78. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091834
30. Johnson, L. N. (1992). Glycogen phosphorylase: control by phosphorylation and allosteric effectors. FASEB J. 6, 2274-2282.
31. Johnson, L. N. (2009). The regulation of protein phosphorylation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37, 627-641. doi: 10.1042/BST0370627
32. Johnson, L. N., and Lewis, R. J. (2001). Structural basis for control by phosphorylation. Chem. Rev. 101, 2209-2242. doi: 10.1021/cr000225s
33. Kales, S. C., Ryan, P. E., and Lipkowitz, S. (2012). Cbl exposes its RING finger. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 131-133. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2241
34. Kast, D., Espinoza-Fonseca, L. M., Yi, C., and Thomas, D. D. (2010). Phosphorylation-induced structural changes in smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 8207-8212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001941107
35. Koivomagi, M., Ord, M., Iofik, A., Valk, E., Venta, R., Faustova, I.,et al. (2013). Multisite phosphorylation networks as signal processors for Cdk1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1415-1424. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2706
36. Kumar, P., Chimenti, M. S., Pemble, H., Schonichen, A., Thompson, O., Jacobson, M. P.,et al. (2012). Multisite phosphorylation disrupts arginine-glutamate salt bridge networks required for binding of cytoplasmic linker-associated protein 2 (CLASP2) to end-binding protein 1 (EB1). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 17050-17064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.316661
37. Li, H., Xing, X., Ding, G., Li, Q., Wang, C., Xie, L.,et al. (2009). SysPTM: a systematic resource for proteomic research on post-translational modifications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1839-1849. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900030-MCP200
38. Li, M., Shoemaker, B. A., Thangudu, R. R., Ferraris, J. D., Burg, M. B., and Panchenko, A. R. (2013). Mutations in DNA-binding loop of NFAT5 transcription factor produce unique outcomes on protein-DNA binding and dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 13226-13234. doi: 10.1021/jp403310a
39. Liang, X., and Van Doren, S. R. (2008). Mechanistic insights into phosphoprotein-binding FHA domains. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 991-999. doi: 10.1021/ar700148u
40. Liokatis, S., Stutzer, A., Elsasser, S. J., Theillet, F. X., Klingberg, R., Van Rossum, B.,et al. (2012). Phosphorylation of histone H3 Ser10 establishes a hierarchy for subsequent intramolecular modification events. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 819-823. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2310
41. Lothrop, A. P., Torres, M. P., and Fuchs, S. M. (2013). Deciphering post-translational modification codes. FEBS Lett. 587, 1247-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.047
42. Lu, K. P., Hanes, S. D., and Hunter, T. (1996). A human peptidyl-prolyl isomerase essential for regulation of mitosis. Nature 380, 544-547. doi: 10.1038/380544a0
43. Lu, K. P., Liou, Y. C., and Zhou, X. Z. (2002). Pinning down proline-directed phosphorylation signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 164-172. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02253-5
44. Lu, L. X., Domingo-Sananes, M. R., Huzarska, M., Novak, B., and Gould, K. L. (2012). Multisite phosphoregulation of Cdc25 activity refines the mitotic entrance and exit switches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9899-9904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201366109
45. Mandell, D. J., Chorny, I., Groban, E. S., Wong, S. E., Levine, E., Rapp, C. S.,et al. (2007). Strengths of hydrogen bonds involving phosphorylated amino acid side chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 820-827. doi: 10.1021/ja063019w
46. Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T., and Sudarsanam, S. (2002). The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298, 1912-1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762
47. Meggio, F., and Pinna, L. A. (2003). One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 17, 349-368. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0473rev
48. Meng, Y., and Roux, B. (2014). Locking the active conformation of c-Src kinase through the phosphorylation of the activation loop. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 423-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.10.001
49. Minguez, P., Parca, L., Diella, F., Mende, D. R., Kumar, R., Helmer-Citterich, M.,et al. (2012). Deciphering a global network of functionally associated post-translational modifications. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8:599. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.31
50. Mitternacht, S., and Berezovsky, I. N. (2011). Coherent conformational degrees of freedom as a structural basis for allosteric communication. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7:e1002301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002301
51. Mohan, A., Oldfield, C. J., Radivojac, P., Vacic, V., Cortese, M. S., Dunker, A. K.,et al. (2006). Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 362, 1043-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.087
52. Murray, D., Hermida-Matsumoto, L., Buser, C. A., Tsang, J., Sigal, C. T., Ben-Tal, N.,et al. (1998). Electrostatics and the membrane association of Src: theory and experiment. Biochemistry 37, 2145-2159. doi: 10.1021/bi972012b
53. Nelson, W. D., Blakely, S. E., Nesmelov, Y. E., and Thomas, D. D. (2005). Site-directed spin labeling reveals a conformational switch in the phosphorylation domain of smooth muscle myosin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4000-4005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401664102
54. Nishi, H., Fong, J. H., Chang, C., Teichmann, S. A., and Panchenko, A. R. (2013). Regulation of protein-protein binding by coupling between phosphorylation and intrinsic disorder: analysis of human protein complexes. Mol. Biosyst. 9, 1620-1626. doi: 10.1039/c3mb25514j
55. Nishi, H., Hashimoto, K., and Panchenko, A. R. (2011). Phosphorylation in protein-protein binding: effect on stability and function. Structure 19, 1807-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.021
56. Nishino, T., Rago, F., Hori, T., Tomii, K., Cheeseman, I. M., and Fukagawa, T. (2013). CENP-T provides a structural platform for outer kinetochore assembly. EMBO J. 32, 424-436. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.348
57. Nussinov, R., Tsai, C. J., Xin, F., and Radivojac, P. (2012). Allosteric post-translational modification codes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 447-455. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.07.001
58. Olsen, J. V., Blagoev, B., Gnad, F., Macek, B., Kumar, C., Mortensen, P.,et al. (2006). Global, in vivo , and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026
59. Olsen, J. V., Vermeulen, M., Santamaria, A., Kumar, C., Miller, M. L., Jensen, L. J.,et al. (2010). Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3:ra3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000475
60. Papamokos, G. V., Tziatzos, G., Papageorgiou, D. G., Georgatos, S. D., Politou, A. S., and Kaxiras, E. (2012). Structural role of RKS motifs in chromatin interactions: a molecular dynamics study of HP1 bound to a variably modified histone tail. Biophys. J. 102, 1926-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.030
61. Patwardhan, P., and Miller, W. T. (2007). Processive phosphorylation: mechanism and biological importance. Cell. Signal. 19, 2218-2226. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.06.006
62. Pawson, T., Gish, G. D., and Nash, P. (2001). SH2 domains, interaction modules and cellular wiring. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 504-511. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02154-7
63. Peng, M., Scholten, A., Heck, A. J., and Van Breukelen, B. (2014). Identification of enriched PTM crosstalk motifs from large-scale experimental data sets. J. Proteome Res. 13, 249-259. doi: 10.1021/pr4005579
64. +-binding site in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 15959-15965. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.340406
65. Querfurth, C., Diernfellner, A. C., Gin, E., Malzahn, E., Hofer, T., and Brunner, M. (2011). Circadian conformational change of the Neurospora clock protein FREQUENCY triggered by clustered hyperphosphorylation of a basic domain. Mol. Cell 43, 713-722. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.033
66. Randez-Gil, F., Sanz, P., Entian, K. D., and Prieto, J. A. (1998). Carbon source-dependent phosphorylation of hexokinase PII and its role in the glucose-signaling response in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2940-2948.
67. Reinhardt, H. C., and Yaffe, M. B. (2013). Phospho-Ser/Thr-binding domains: navigating the cell cycle and DNA damage response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 563-580. doi: 10.1038/nrm3640
68. Rubin, S. M. (2013). Deciphering the retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation code. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.10.007
69. Salazar, C., and Hofer, T. (2009). Multisite protein phosphorylation - from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models. FEBS J. 276, 3177-3198. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07027.x
70. Scheinin, M., Koulu, M., Karhuvaara, S., and Zimmer, R. H. (1990). Evidence that the reversible MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide increases prolactin secretion by a serotonergic mechanism in healthy male volunteers. Life Sci. 47, 1491-1499. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90529-Z
71. Schweiger, R., and Linial, M. (2010). Cooperativity within proximal phosphorylation sites is revealed from large-scale proteomics data. Biol. Direct 5:6. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-5-6
72. Sellers, J. R. (1985). Mechanism of the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15815-15819.
73. Serber, Z., and Ferrell, J. E. Jr. (2007). Tuning bulk electrostatics to regulate protein function. Cell 128, 441-444. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.018
74. Shen, T., Zong, C., Hamelberg, D., Mccammon, J. A., and Wolynes, P. G. (2005). The folding energy landscape and phosphorylation: modeling the conformational switch of the NFAT regulatory domain. FASEB J. 19, 1389-1395. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3590hyp
75. Suenaga, A., Hatakeyama, M., Kiyatkin, A. B., Radhakrishnan, R., Taiji, M., and Kholodenko, B. N. (2009). Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that Tyr-317 phosphorylation reduces Shc binding affinity for phosphotyrosyl residues of epidermal growth factor receptor. Biophys. J. 96, 2278-2288. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.018
76. Sugase, K., Dyson, H. J., and Wright, P. E. (2007). Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 447, 1021-1025. doi: 10.1038/nature05858
77. Swaney, D. L., Beltrao, P., Starita, L., Guo, A., Rush, J., Fields, S.,et al. (2013). Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 10, 676-682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2519
78. ter Haar, E., Coll, J. T., Austen, D. A., Hsiao, H. M., Swenson, L., and Jain, J. (2001). Structure of GSK3Β reveals a primed phosphorylation mechanism. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 593-596. doi: 10.1038/89624
79. Vassall, K. A., Bessonov, K., De Avila, M., Polverini, E., and Harauz, G. (2013). The effects of threonine phosphorylation on the stability and dynamics of the central molecular switch region of 18.5-kDa myelin basic protein. PLoS ONE 8:e68175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068175
80. Venne, A. S., Kollipara, L., and Zahedi, R. P. (2014). The next level of complexity: crosstalk of posttranslational modifications. Proteomics 14, 513-524. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201300344
81. Via, A., Diella, F., Gibson, T. J., and Helmer-Citterich, M. (2011). From sequence to structural analysis in protein phosphorylation motifs. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 16:1261-1275.
82. Wang, Z., Gucek, M., and Hart, G. W. (2008). Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O-GlcNAc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13793-13798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806216105
83. Woodsmith, J., Kamburov, A., and Stelzl, U. (2013). Dual coordination of post translational modifications in human protein networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1002933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002933
84. Wright, P. E., and Dyson, H. J. (1999). Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321-331. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110
85. Xin, F., and Radivojac, P. (2012). Post-translational modifications induce significant yet not extreme changes to protein structure. Bioinformatics 28, 2905-2913. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts541
86. Yaffe, M. B., Rittinger, K., Volinia, S., Caron, P. R., Aitken, A., Leffers, H.,et al. (1997). The structural basis for 14-3-3: phosphopeptide binding specificity. Cell 91, 961-971. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80487-0
87. Yoon, M. K., Mitrea, D. M., Ou, L., and Kriwacki, R. W. (2012). Cell cycle regulation by the intrinsically disordered proteins p21 and p27. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 981-988. doi: 10.1042/BST20120092
88. Zanzoni, A., Carbajo, D., Diella, F., Gherardini, P. F., Tramontano, A., Helmer-Citterich, M.,et al. (2011). Phospho3D 2.0: an enhanced database of three-dimensional structures of phosphorylation sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D268-D271. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq936