A system based network approach to ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kasavi, Ceyda ^a   Eraslan, Serpil ^a   Arga, Kazim Y ^b   Oner, Ebru T ^b   Kirdar, Betul ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Candidate genes; Ethanol tolerance network; Protein protein interaction network; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; TRANSCRIPTOME;

DRUG EFFECTS; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, FUNGAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84905730531     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-014-0090-6     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Yazawa H, Iwahashi H, Uemura H: Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2007, 24:551-560..
2. Stanley D, Bandara A, Fraser S, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA: The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae .J Appl Microbiol 2010, 109:13-24..
3. Ma M, Liu ZL: Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87:829-845..
4. Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26:89-105. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.09.002, 17964107.
5. Alexandre H, Charpentier C. Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish fermentation in grape must. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 20:20-27. 10.1038/sj.jim.2900442.
6. Bai FW, Chen LJ, Zhang Z, Anderson W, Moo-Young M. Continuous ethanol production and evaluation of yeast cell lysis and viability loss under very high gravity medium conditions. J Biotechnol 2004, 110:287-293. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.017, 15163519.
7. Fischer CR, Klein-Marcuschamer D, Stephanopoulos G. Selection and optimization of microbial hosts for Biofuels production. Metab Eng 2008, 10:295-304. 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.06.009, 18655844.
8. Kasavi C, Finore I, Lama L, Nicolaus B, Oliver SG, Toksoy Oner E, Kirdar B: Evaluation of Industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 45:230-238..
9. Hirasawa T, Yoshikawa K, Nakakura Y, Nagahisa K, Furusawa C, Katakura Y, Shimizu H, Shioya S: Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J Biotechnol 2007, 131:34-44..
10. Ling H, Teo W, Chen B, Leong SSJ, Chang MW. Microbial tolerance engineering toward biochemical production: from lignocellulose to products. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014, 29C:99-106. 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.03.005, 24743028.
11. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Furusawa C, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Shimizu H: Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . FEMS Yeast Res 2009, 9:32-44..
12. Berry DB, Gasch AP. Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19(November):4580-4587. 10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0680, 18753408.
13. Kubota S, Takeo I, Kume K, Kanai M, Shitamukai A, Mizunuma M, Miyakawa T, Shimoi H, Iefuji H, Hirata D. Effect of ethanol on cell growth of budding yeast: genes that are important for cell growth in the presence of ethanol. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2004, 68:968-972. 10.1271/bbb.68.968, 15118337.
14. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y, Iwahashi H. The genome-wide screening of yeast deletion mutants to identify the genes required for tolerance to ethanol and other alcohols. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6:744-750. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00040.x, 16879425.
15. Van Voorst F, Houghton-Larsen J, Jønson L, Kielland-Brandt MC, Brandt A: Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 2006, 23:351-359..
16. Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 2006, 314(80):1565-1568. 17158319.
17. Li H, Ma M-L, Luo S, Zhang R-M, Han P, Hu W: Metabolic responses to ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012, 44:1087-1096.
18. Vidal M, Cusick ME, Baraba´si AL. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011, 144:986-998. 21414488.
19. Baraba´si AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:56-68. 21164525.
20. Jiang X, Liu B, Jiang J, Zhao H, Fan M, Zhang J, Fan Z, Jiang T. Modularity in the genetic disease-phenotype network. FEBS Lett 2008, 582:2549-2554. 18582463.
21. Rende D, Baysal N, Kirdar B. A novel integrative network approach to understand the interplay between cardiovascular disease and other complex disorders. Mol Biosyst 2011, 7:2205-2219. 21559538.
22. Chen J, Yuan B. Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2283-2290. 16837529.
23. Karimpour-Fard A, Leach SM, Hunter LE, Gill RT. The topology of the bacterial co-conserved protein network and its implications for predicting protein function. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:313. 18590549.
24. Tsankov AM, Brown CR, Yu MC, Win MZ, Silver P, Casolari JM. Communication between levels of transcriptional control improves robustness and adaptivity. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2:1-10.
25. Vermeirssen V, Barrasa MI, Hidalgo C, Babon JAB, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Baraba´si AL, Walhout AJM: Transcription factor modularity in a gene-centered C. elegans core neuronal protein-DNA interaction network. Genome Res 2007, 17:1061-1071
26. Simonis N, Gonze D, Orsi C, Van Helden J, Wodak SJ. Modularity of the transcriptional response of protein complexes in yeast. J Mol Biol 2006, 363:589-610. 16973176.
27. Wang Z, Zhang J. In search of the biological significance of modular structures in protein networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e107. 17542644.
28. Yoon J, Blumer A, Lee K. An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:3106-3108. 17060356.
29. Tanay A, Sharan R, Kupiec M, Shamir R. Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genomewide data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:2981-2986. 14973197.
30. Zhang S, Wang RS, Zhang XS. Identification of overlapping community structure in complex networks using fuzzy c-means clustering. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl 2007, 374:483-490.
31. Bader GD, Hogue CWV. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:2. 12525261.
32. Alberghina L, Mavelli G, Drovandi G, Palumbo P, Pessina S, Tripodi F,Coccetti P, Vanoni M: Cell growth and cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: basic regulatory design and protein-protein interaction network. Biotechnol Adv 2012, 30:52-72.
33. Arga YK, O¨nsan Z, Ki{dotless}rdar B, U¨lgen K, Nielsen J. Understanding signaling in yeast: insights from network analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 97:1246-1258. 17252576.
34. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database issue):D535-D539. 16381927.
35. Lewis J, Elkon IM, McGee M, Higbee AJ, Gasch AP: Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 2010, 186:1197-1205.
36. Hong ME, Lee KS, Yu BJ, Sung YJ, Park SM, Koo HM, Kweon DH, Park JC, Jin YS: Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering. J Biotechnol 2010, 149:52-59.
37. Kim HS, Kim NR, Choi W: Total fatty acid content of the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is more responsible for ethanol tolerance than the degree of nsaturation. Biotechnol Lett 2011, 33:509-515.
38. Jime´nez-Marti´ E, Zuzuarregui A, Ridaura I, Lozano N, Del Olmo M. Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 130:122-130. 19217680.
39. Assenov Y, Rami´rez F, Schelhorn SE, Lengauer T, Albrecht M. Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:282-284. 18006545.
40. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13:2498-2504. 14597658.
41. Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3448-3449. 15972284.
42. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD:Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C:a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 1998, 14:115-132.
43. Brajtburg J, Elberg S, Medoff G, Kobayashi GS: Increase in colony-forming units of Candida albicans after treatment with polyene antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1981, 19:199-200.
44. Bolstad BM, Irizarry R, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:185-193. 12538238.
45. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry R. Affy-analysis of affymetrix genechip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:307-315. 14960456.
46. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JYH, Zhang J. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R80. 15461798.
47. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing diferential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:Article 3.
48. Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S. AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:288-289. 19033274.
49. Oliveira AP, Patil KR, Nielsen J. Architecture of transcriptional regulatory circuits is knitted over the topology of bio-molecular interaction networks. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:1-16.
50. Patil KR, Nielsen J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:2685-2689. 15710883.
51. Cvijovic M, Olivares-Herna´ndez R, Agren R, Dahr N, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, Patil KR, Nielsen J. BioMet toolbox: genome-wide analysis of metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Web Server issue):W144-W149. 20483918.
52. Teixeira MC, Monteiro PT, Guerreiro JF, Gonc¸alves JP, Mira NP, Dos Santos SC, Cabrito TR, Palma M, Costa C, Francisco AP, Madeira SC, Oliveira AL,Freitas AT, Sa´-Correia I: The YEASTRACT database: an upgradedinformation system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D161-166.
53. Cankorur-Cetinkaya A, Eraslan S, Kirdar B: Transcriptional remodelling in response to changing copper levels in the Wilson and Menkes disease model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biosyst 2013, 9:2889-2908.
54. Mrowka R, Patzak A, Herzel H. Is there a bias in proteome research?. Genome Res 2001, 11:1971-1973. 11731485.
55. Von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver S, Fields S, Bork P. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417:399-403. 12000970.
56. Karagoz K, Arga KY. Assessment of high-confidence protein-protein interactome in yeast. Comput Biol Chem 2013, 45:1-8. 23608186.
57. Lohmann G, Margulies DS, Horstmann A, Pleger B, Lepsien J, Goldhahn D, Schloegl H, Stumvoll M, Villringer A, Turner R. Eigenvector centrality mapping for analyzing connectivity patterns in fmri data of the human brain. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10232. 20436911.
58. Wang J, Chen G, Li M, Pan Y. Integration of breast cancer gene signatures based on graph centrality. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5(Suppl 3):S10. 22784616.
59. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Baraba´si AL. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002, 297(80):1551-1555. 12202830.
60. Ravasz E, Baraba´si AL. Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2003, 67(2 Pt 2):1-7.
61. Pavlopoulos GA, Secrier M, Moschopoulos CN, Soldatos TG, Kossida S, Aerts J, Schneider R, Bagos PG. Using graph theory to analyze biological networks. Bio Data Min 2011, 4:10.
62. Gentzsch M, Tanner W: The PMT gene family: protein O-Glycosylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is vital. EMBO J 1996, 15:5752-575959.
63. Despons L, Wirth B, Louis VL, Potier S, Souciet JL. An evolutionary scenario for one of the largest yeast gene families. Trends Genet 2006, 22:10-15. 16269202.
64. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Ve´ronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre´ B, Arkin AP, Astromoff A, El-Bakkoury M, Bangham R, Benito R, Brachat S, Campanaro S, Curtiss M, Davis K, Deutschbauer A, Entian KD, Flaherty P, Foury F, Garfinkel D, Gerstein M, Gotte D, Gu¨ldener U, Hegemann JH, Hempel S, Herman Z, et al: Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391..
65. Popolo L, Vai M. The gas1 glycoprotein, a putative wall polymer cross-linker. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999, 1426:385-400. 9878845.
66. Hamada K, Terashima H, Arisawa M, Yabuki N, Kitada K. Amino acid residues in the omega-minus region participate in cellular localization of yeast glycosylphosphatidylinositol-attached proteins. J Bacteriol 1999, 181:3886-3889. 10383953.
67. Mouyna I, Monod M, Fontaine T, Henrissat B, Le´chenne B, Latge´ JP. Identification of the catalytic residues of the first family of β(1-3)glucanosyltransferases identified in fungi. Biochem J 2000, 347(Pt 3):741-747. 10769178.
68. Rolli E, Ragni E, Rodriguez-Pena JM, Arroyo J, Popolo L: GAS3, a developmentally regulated gene, encodes a highly mannosylated and inactive protein of the gas family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2010, 27:597-610.
69. Kim H, Mele´n K, Von Heijne G: Topology models for 37 Saccharomyces cerevisiae membrane proteins based on C-terminal reporter fusions and predictions. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:10208-10213.
70. Millson SH, Truman AW, King V, Prodromou C, Pearl LH, Piper PW. A two-hybrid screen of the yeast proteome for Hsp90 interactors uncovers a novel Hsp90 chaperone requirement in the activity of a stress-activated mitogen-activated protein Kinase, Slt2p (Mpk1p). Eukaryot Cell 2005, 4:849-860. 15879519.
71. Tao X, Zheng D, Liu T, Wang P, Zhao W, Zhu M, Jiang X, Zhao Y, Wu X: A novel strategy to construct yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity fermentation. PLoS One 2012, 7:e31235
72. Thammasittirong SN-R, Thirasaktana T, Thammasittirong A, Srisodsuk M: Improvement of ethanol production by ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae UVNR56. Springerplus 2013, 2:583
73. Teixeira MC, Godinho CP, Cabrito TR, Mira NP, Sa´-Correia I. Increased expression of the yeast multidrug resistance ABC transporter Pdr18 leads to increased ethanol tolerance and ethanol production in high gravity alcoholic fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 2012, 11:1-9.
74. Anderson MJ, Barker SL, Boone C, Measday V: Identification of RCN1 and RSA3 as ethanol-tolerant genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a high copy barcoded library. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:48-60. using a high copy barcoded library. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:48-60.
75. Dinh TN, NaDgahisa K, Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H: Analysis of adaptation to high ethanol concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray. Bioprocess Biosys Eng 2009, 32:681-688.
76. Li BZ, Cheng JS, Ding MZ, Yuan YJ. Transcriptome analysis of differential responses of diploid and haploid yeast to ethanol stress. J Biotechnol 2010, 148:194-203. 20561546.
77. Michaelis S, Herskowitz I: The a-factor pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for mating. Mol Cell Biol 1988, 8:1309-1318.
78. Managbanag JR, Witten TM, Bonchev D, Fox L, Tsuchiya M, Kennedy BK, Kaeberlein M. Shortest-path network analysis is a useful approach toward identifying genetic determinants of longevity. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3802. 19030232.
79. McIsaac RS, Petti A, Bussemaker HJ, Botstein D. Perturbation-based analysis and modeling of combinatorial regulation in the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:2993-3007. 22696683.
80. Tkach JM, Yimit A, Lee AY, Riffle M, Costanzo M, Jaschob D, Hendry J, Ou J, Moffat J, Boone C, Davis TN, Nislow C, Brown GW. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:966-976. 22842922.