Evaluation of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from biomass

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 230-238

  Kasavi, Ceyda ^a   Finore, Ilaria ^b   Lama, Licia ^b   Nicolaus, Barbara ^b   Oliver, Stephen G ^c   Toksoy Oner, Ebru ^d   Kirdar, Betul ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agro industrial waste; Biomass; Ethanol; Ethanol tolerance; Industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

Indexed keywords

AGRO-INDUSTRIAL WASTES; BEET MOLASSES; CARBON RESOURCES; CULTIVATION CONDITIONS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL TOLERANCE; ETHANOL YIELD; GROWTH ABILITY; LIQUID CULTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS; RAPID GROWTH; S.CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; STRAIN IMPROVEMENT; SUGAR BEET PULP; SUSPENSION CULTURES;

BIOMASS; ECOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; INDUSTRIAL WASTES; INDUSTRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRAIN; SUGAR BEETS; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

ETHANOL;

BIOMASS; BREWING INDUSTRY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; WASTE; YEAST;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; DAUCUS CAROTA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84864291906     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Eisentraut E. Sustainable production of second-generation biofuels: potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries 2010 Feb, International Energy Agency, Paris, 211 p.
2. Balat M., Balat H. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl Energy 2009, 86(11):2273-2282.
3. Tsai W.T., Lin C.C., Yeh C.W. An analysis of biodiesel fuel from waste edible oil in Taiwan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11(5):838-857.
4. Berglund M., Borjesson P. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30(3):254-266.
5. das Neves M.A., Kimura T., Shimizu N., Nakajima M. State of the art and future trends of bioethanol production, dynamic biochemistry. Dyn Biochem Process Biotech Mol Biol 2007, 1(1):1-14.
6. Escobar J.C., Lora E.S., Venturini O.J., Yanéz E.E., Castillo E.F., Almazan O. Biofuels: environment, technology and food security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(6-7):1275-1287.
7. Içöz E., Tuĝrul K.M., Saral A., Içöz E. Research on ethanol production and use from sugar beet in Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33(1):1-7.
8. Naik S.N., Goud V.V., Rout P.K., Dalai A.K. Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14(2):578-597.
9. Koh L.P., Levang P., Ghazoul J. Designer landscapes for sustainable biofuels. Trends Ecol Evol 2009, 24(8):431-438.
10. Chen J., Zhang W., Tan L., Wang Y., He G. Optimization of metabolic pathways for bioconversion of lignocellulose to ethanol through genetic engineering. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27(5):593-598.
11. Attfield P.V. Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat Biotechnol 1997, 15(13):1351-1357.
12. Alexandre H., Charpentier C. Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish fermentation in grape must. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 20(1):20-27.
13. Fischer C.R., Klein-Marcuschamer D., Stephanopoulos G. Selection and optimization of microbial hosts for biofuels production. Metab Eng 2008, 10(6):295-304.
14. Hirasawa T., Yoshikawa K., Nakakura Y., Nagahisa K., Furusawa C., Katakura Y., et al. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J Biotechnol 2007, 131(1):34-44.
15. Liti G., Carter D.M., Moses A.M., Warringer J., Parts L., James S.A., et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009, 458(7236):337-341.
16. Gerke J.P., Chen C.T.L., Cohen B.A. Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 2006, 174(2):985-997.
17. Watanabe M., Tamura K., Magbanua J.P., Takano K., Kitamoto K., Kitagaki H., et al. Elevated expression of genes under the control of stress response element (STRE) and Msn2p in an ethanol-tolerance sake yeast Kyokai no 11. J Biosci Bioeng 2007, 104(3):163-170.
18. Fay J.C., Benavides J.A. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2005, 1(1):66-71.
19. Gardner N., Rodrigue N., Champagne C. Combined effects of sulfites, temperature, and agitation time on production of glycerol in grape juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59(7):2022-2028.
20. Mukherjee A.K., Adhikari H., Rai S.K. Production of alkaline protease by a thermophilic Bacillus subtilis under solid-state fermentation (SSF) condition using Imperata cylindrical grass and potato peel as low-cost medium: characterization and application of enzyme in detergent formulation. Biochem Eng J 2008, 39(2):353-361.
21. Bernfeld P. Amylases α and β. Methods Enzymol 1955, 1(C):149-158.
22. Toksoy Oner E. Optimization of ethanol production from starch by an amylolytic nuclear petite Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Yeast 2006, 23(12):849-856.
23. Wold S., Esbensen K., Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab 1987, 2(1-3):37-52.
24. Hu X.H., Wang M.H., Tan T., Li J.R., Yang H., Leach L., et al. Genetic dissection of ethanol tolerance in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2007, 175(3):1479-1487.
25. Yazawa H., Iwahashi H., Uemura H. Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2007, 24(7):551-560.
26. Yoshikawa K., Tanaka T., Furusawa C., Nagahisa K., Hirasawa T., Shimizu H. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2009, 9(1):32-44.
27. Jiménez-Martí E., Zuzuarregui A., Ridaura I., Lozano N., del Olmo M. Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 130(2):122-130.
28. Kim H.S., Kim N.R., Choi W. Total fatty acid content of the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is more responsible for ethanol tolerance than the degree of unsaturation. Biotechnol Lett 2011, 33(3):509-515.
29. Lewis J.A., Elkon I.M., McGee M.A., Higbee A.J., Gasch A.P. Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 2010, 186(4):1197-1205.
30. Hong M.E., Lee K.S., Yu B.J., Sung Y.J., Park S.M., Koo H.M., et al. Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering. J Biotechnol 2010, 149(1-2):52-59.
31. ORF finder [tool on the internet] the sequence manipulation suite 2011, Available from:, [accessed 12.03.11]. http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/index.html.
32. ClustalW2 [tool on the internet] multiple sequence alignment 2011, Available from:, [accessed 12.03.11]. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/.
33. Ho Y., Gruhler A., Heilbut A., Bader G.D., Moore L., Adams S.L., et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002, 415(6868):180-183.
34. Ptacek J., Devgan G., Michaud G., Zhu H., Zhu X., Fasolo J., et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005, 438(7068):679-684.
35. Costanzo M., Baryshnikova A., Bellay J., Kim Y., Spear E.D., Sevier C.S., et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327(5964):425-431.
36. Fiedler D., Braberg H., Mehta M., Chechik G., Cagney G., Mukherjee P., et al. Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell 2009, 136(5):952-963.
37. SGD [database on the internet] Saccharomyces genome database 2011, Available from:, [accessed 15.05.11]. http://wwwyeastgenomeorg/.