Integration of breast cancer gene signatures based on graph centrality

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages

  Wang, Jianxin ^a   Chen, Gang ^a   Li, Min ^a,b   Pan, Yi ^a,b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TUMOR GENE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, NEOPLASM; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84255194444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-S3-S10     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Itadani H, Mizuarai S, Kotani H. Can systems biology understand pathway activation? Gene expression signatures as surrogate markers for understanding the complexity of pathway activation. Curr Genomics 2008, 9(5):349-360. 10.2174/138920208785133235, 2694555, 19517027.
2. van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002, 415(6871):530-536. 10.1038/415530a, 11823860.
3. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van 't Veer LJ, et al. A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2002, 347(25):1999-2009. 10.1056/NEJMoa021967, 12490681.
4. Chuang HY, Lee E, Liu YT, Lee D, Ideker T. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:140. 2063581, 17940530.
5. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 351(27):2817-2826. 10.1056/NEJMoa041588, 15591335.
6. Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature 2005, 436(7050):518-524. 10.1038/nature03799, 1283098, 16049480.
7. Wang Y, Klijn JGM, Zhang Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 2005, 365(9460):671-679.
8. van Vliet MH, Reyal F, Horlings HM, et al. Pooling breast cancer datasets has a synergetic effect on classification performance and improves signature stability. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:375. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-375, 2527336, 18684329.
9. Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F, Buyse M, Cardoso F, Veer LV, Piccart M, Bontempi G, Sotiriou C. Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:394. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-394, 2533026, 18717985.
10. Blazadonakis ME, Zervakis ME, Kafetzopoulos D. Complementary gene signature integration in multi-platform microarray experiments. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2011, 15:155-163.
11. Lage K, Karlberg EO, Størling ZM, et al. A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25(3):309-316. 10.1038/nbt1295, 17344885.
12. Lee Y, Yang X, Huang Y, Fan H, et al. Network modeling identifies molecular functions targeted by miR-204 to suppress head and neck tumor metastasis. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(4):e1000730. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000730, 2848541, 20369013.
13. Laere SV, der Auwera IV, den Eynden GGV, et al. Distinct molecular signature of inflammatory breast cancer by cDNA microarray analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 93(3):237-246. 10.1007/s10549-005-5157-z, 16172796.
14. Guo NL, Wan YW, Bose S, Denvir J, Kashon ML, Andrew ME. A novel network model identified a 13-gene lung cancer prognostic signature. Int J Comput Biol Drug Des 2011, 4:19-39. 10.1504/IJCBDD.2011.038655, 21330692.
15. Chen J, Sam L, Huang Y, et al. Protein interaction network underpins concordant prognosis among heterogeneous breast cancer signatures. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010, 43(3):385-396. 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.009, 2878851, 20350617.
16. Chen JL, Li J, Stadler WM, Lussier YA. Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011, 18(4):392-402. 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000178, 3128407, 21672909.
17. Culhane AC, Schwarzl T, Sultana R, et al. GeneSigDB-a curated database of gene expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, (38 Database):D716-D725.
18. Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Reguly T, et al. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, (36 Database):D637-D640.
19. Prasad TSK, Goel R, Kandasamy K, et al. Human Protein Reference Database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, (37 Database):D767-D772.
20. Li M, Wang J, Wang H, Pan Y. Essential Proteins Discovery from Weighted Protein Interaction Networks. Bioinformatics Research and Applications 2010, 89-100.
21. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411(6833):41-42. 10.1038/35075138, 11333967.
22. Joy MP, Brock A, Ingber DE, Huang S. High-betweenness proteins in the yeast protein interaction network. J Biomed Biotechnol 2005, 2005(2):96-103. 10.1155/JBB.2005.96, 1184047, 16046814.
23. Wuchty S, Stadler PF. Centers of complex networks. J Theor Biol 2003, 223:45-53. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00071-7, 12782116.
24. Estrada E, Rodríguez-Velázquez JA. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2005, 71(5 Pt 2):056103.
25. Bonacich P. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. The American Journal of Sociology 1987, 92(5):1170-1182.
26. Stephenson K, Zelen M. Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks 1989, 11:1-37.
27. Hwang W, Cho Y, Zhang A, Ramanathan M. A novel functional module detection algorithm for protein-protein interaction networks. Algorithms Mol Biol 2006, 12:1-24.
28. Bu D. Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:2443-2450. 10.1093/nar/gkg340, 154226, 12711690.
29. Li M, Chen J, Wang J, et al. Modifying the DPClus algorithm for identifying protein complexes based on new topological structures. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:398. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-398, 2570695, 18816408.
30. Spirin V, Mirny L. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. PNAS 2003, 100:12123-12128. 10.1073/pnas.2032324100, 218723, 14517352.
31. Cho YR, Hwang W, Zhang A. Identification of Overlapping Functional Modules in Protein Interaction Networks: Information Flow-based Approach. ICDMW '06 2006, 147-152. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
32. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4:44-57.
33. Mosca E, Alfieri R, Merelli I, et al. A multilevel data integration resource for breast cancer study. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:76. 10.1186/1752-0509-4-76, 2900226, 20525248.
34. Estrada E. Virtual identification of essential proteins within the protein interaction network of yeast. Proteomics 2006, 6:35-40. 10.1002/pmic.200500209, 16281187.
35. Furney SJ, Albà MM, López-Bigas N. Differences in the evolutionary history of disease genes affected by dominant or recessive mutations. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:165. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-165, 1534034, 16817963.
36. Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, et al. Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13(11):3207-3214. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765, 17545524.