Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 232-256

  Borup, Jered ^a   West, Richard E ^b   Thomas, Rebecca A ^b   Graham, Charles R ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Community; Computer mediated communication; Feedback; Higher education; Online learning; Social presence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905122913     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1821     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anderson, T. (2009). A rose by any other name: Still distance education - a response to D. R. Garrison: Implications of online and blended learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 111-116.
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R.,&Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D., Ice, P., Richardson, J.,&Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
4. Barrow, T. H. (2012). Social presence in the asynchronous online classroom: The asynchronous online video conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
5. Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H.,&Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126.
6. Borup, J., Graham, C. R.,&Velasquez, A. (2011). The use of asynchronous video communication to improve instructor immediacy and social presence in a blended learning environment. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 38-57). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
7. Borup, J., West, R. E.,&Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: a narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34(1), 48-63.
8. Borup, J., West, R. E.,&Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001
9. Cuthrell, K., Fogarty, E. A.,&Anderson, P. J. (2009). "Is this thing on?" University student preferences regarding audio feedback. Society for Information Technology&Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 32-35).
10. Draft, R. L.,&Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
11. Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L.,&Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf
12. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T.,&Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
14. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T.,&Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
15. Garrison, D. R.,&Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
16. Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 93-104.
17. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/798843
18. Gould, J.,&Day, P. (2012). Hearing you loud and clear: Student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-13.
19. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J.,&Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
20. Griffiths, M. E.,&Graham, C. R. (2009a). The potential of asynchronous video in online education. Distance Learning, 6(2), 13-23.
21. Griffiths, M. E.,&Graham, C. R. (2009b). Using asynchronous video in online classes: Results from a pilot study. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(3), 65-76.
22. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
23. Hailey, D. E., Grant-Davie, K.,&Hult, C. A. (2001). Online education horror stories worthy of Halloween: A short list of problems and solutions in online instruction. Computers and Composition, 18, 387-397.
24. Hara, N.,&Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12).
25. Hew, K. F.,&Cheung, W. S. (2013). Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science, 41(2), 365-380.
26. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P.,&Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25.
27. Johnson, L. P. (2008). The caring teacher: Tips to motivate student learning. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman&Littlefield Education.
28. Khurana, C.,&Boling, E. (2010). "Setting the Climate": The role of instructional design and multimedia to enhance social presence. World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications (pp. 1813-1818).
29. Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763-777. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x
30. Kim, L. (2004). Online technologies for teaching writing: Students react to teacher response in voice and written modalities. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(3), 304-337.
31. Kirschner, P. A., Brink, H.,&Meester, M. (1991). Audiotape feedback for essays in distance education. Innovative Higher Education, 15(2), 185-195.
32. Martin, L.,&Mottet, T. P. (2011). The effect of instructor nonverbal immediacy behaviors and feedback sensitivity on Hispanic students' affective learning outcomes in ninth-grade writing conferences. Communication Education, 60(1), 1-19.
33. Mathieson, K. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of audiovisual feedback via screencasting in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), 143-156.
34. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
35. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36. Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. D. Boyd&J. Apps (Eds.), Redefining the discipline of adult education (pp. 16-31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Retrieved from http://www.ajde.com/Documents/independent_study.pdf
37. Moore, N. S.,&Filling, M. L. (2012). iFeedback: Using video technology for improving student writing. Journal of College Literacy&Learning, 38, 3-14.
38. Olesova, L. A.,&Richardson, J. C. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: A mixed methods study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 30-42.
39. Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L.,&Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 267-276.
40. Palloff, R. M.,&Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41. Parsad, B.,&Lewis, L. (2009). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-07. World Wide Web Internet And Web Information Systems. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf
42. Parton, B. S., Crain-Dorough, M.,&Hancock, R. (2010). Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(1).
43. Pearce, C. G.,&Ackley, R. J. (1995). Audiotaped feedback in business writing: An exploratory study. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 31-35.
44. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J.,&O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.
45. Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J.,&Dunne, E. (2011). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 217-231.
46. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R.,&Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51-70.
47. Shea, P., Sauli, C.,&Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
48. Short, J., Williams, E.,&Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley&Sons.
49. Silva, M. L. (2012). Camtasia in the classroom: Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2011.12.001
50. Song, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J.,&Koh, M. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70.
51. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication&Information, 2(1), 23-49.
52. Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-innes, M.,&Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. e-mentor, 2(24), 1-12.
53. Swan, K.,&Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
54. Thompson, R.,&Lee, M. J. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology&Pedagogy, 1.
55. Tu, C.,&McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
56. Wiener, M.&Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
57. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transformative qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
58. Wolsey, T. D. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311-329.
59. Wood, K. A., Moskovitz, C.,&Valiga, T. M. (2011). Audio feedback for student writing in online nursing courses: Exploring student and instructor reactions. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(9), 540-3.
60. Yang, C., Tsai, I., Kim, B., Cho, M.,&Laffey, J. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 277-286.