The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: a narrative analysis of four cases

Distance Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 48-63

  Borup, Jered ^a   West, Richard E ^b   Graham, Charles R ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

asynchronous video communication; computer mediated communication; English language learners; introversion extroversion; self regulation; social presence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878983686     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2013.770427     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G. and Fox, S. 2002. 'On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert': Extroversion, neuroticism, and nternet interaction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5: 125 - 128. doi: 10.1089/109493102753770507
2. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011033.pdf.
3. Bailey, D.M. and Jackson, J.M. 2003. Qualitative data analysis: Challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57: 57 - 65. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.1.57
4. Borup, J., Graham, C.R. and Velasquez, A. 2011. " The use of asynchronous video communication to improve instructor immediacy and social presence in a blended learning environment ". In Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation, Edited by: Kitchenham, A. 38 - 57. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
5. Borup, J., West, R.E. and Graham, C.R. 2012. Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15: 195 - 203. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001
6. Carr, S. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23). Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/.
7. Caspi, A. and Blau, I. 2008. Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11: 323 - 346. doi: 10.1007/s11218-008-9054-2
8. Connelly, F.M. and Clandinin, D.J. 1990. Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19: 2 - 14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X019005002
9. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education,: 87 - 105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
10. Gerbic, P. 2010. Getting the blend right in new learning environments: A complementary approach to online discussions. Education and Information Technologies, 15: 125 - 137. doi: 10.1007/s10639-009-9100-5
11. Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J. and Graham, W.F. 1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11: 255 - 274. doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255
12. Griffiths, M. E., & Graham, C. R. (2009a). The potential of asynchronous video in online education. Distance Learning, 6(2), 13-23. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/distance-learning.html.
13. Griffiths, M. E., & Graham, C. R. (2009b). Using asynchronous video in online classes: Results from a pilot study. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 6(3), 65-76. Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_09/article06.htm.
14. Gudykunst, W.B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. and Heyman, S. 1996. The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22: 510 - 543. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
15. Hew, K.F. and Cheung, W.S. 2012. Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science, 41: 365 - 380. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9232-7
16. Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J. and Gunawardena, C. 1994. Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8: 30 - 42. doi: 10.1080/08923649409526853
17. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and student's sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.
18. Kehrwald, B. 2008. Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29: 89 - 106. doi: 10.1080/01587910802004860
19. Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2006). Personality types and learners' interaction in web-based threaded discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 83-94. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html.
20. Lunt, T. and Curran, J. 2010. 'Are you listening please?' The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35: 759 - 769. doi: 10.1080/02602930902977772
21. Merriam, S.B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J. and Delaval, M. 2011. Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56: 243 - 252. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
23. Moore, M.G. 2002. Editorial: What does research say about the learners using computer-mediated communication in distance learning?. American Journal of Distance Education, 16: 61 - 64. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602
24. Moore, N. S., & Filling, M. L. (2012). iFeedback: Using video technology for improving student writing. Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 38, 3-14. Retrieved from http://j-cll.com/files/38_3_MF.pdf.
25. Mykota, D. and Duncan, R. 2007. Learner characteristics as predictors of online social presence. Canadian Journal of Education, 30: 157 - 170. doi: 10.2307/20466630
26. Palloff, R.M. and Pratt, K. 2007. Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2009). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-07. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf.
28. Patterson, B., & McFadden, C. (2009). Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/.
29. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.
30. Polkinghorne, D.E. 1995. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8: 5 - 23. doi: 10.1080/0951839950080103
31. Pratt, H. K. (1996). The electronic personality (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 304283630).
32. Puzziferro, M. 2008. Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22: 72 - 89. doi: 10.1080/08923640802039024
33. Riessman, C.K. 1993. Narrative analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51-70. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/153.
35. Rovai, A.P. 2007. Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10: 77 - 88. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
36. Shea, P. and Bidjerano, T. 2010. Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55: 1721 - 1731. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
37. Shea, P., Sauli, C. and Pickett, A. 2006. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9: 175 - 190. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
38. Song, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J. and Koh, M. 2004. Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7: 59 - 70. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
39. Stake, R.E. 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.
41. Tu, C.-H. and McIsaac, M. 2002. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16: 131 - 150. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603
42. Tunison, S. and Noonan, B. 2001. On-line learning: Secondary students' first experience. Canadian Journal of Education, 26: 495 - 511. doi: 10.2307/1602179
43. Wolcott, H.F. 1994. Transformative qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Wrench, J.S. and Punyanunt-Carter, N.M. 2007. The relationship between computer-mediated-communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal, 72: 355 - 378. doi: 10.1080/10417940701667696
45. Yildiz, S. and Bichelmeyer, B.A. 2003. Exploring electronic forum participation and interaction by EFL speakers in two web-based graduate-level courses. Distance Education, 24: 175 - 193. doi: 10.1080/0158791032000127464