Online technologies for teaching writing: Students react to teacher response in voice and written modalities

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 304-334

  Kim, Loel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644491868     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. ANSON, C. (1997). In our own voices: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing. In P. Elbow & M. D. Sorcinelli (Eds.), Writing to learn: Strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 105-115). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. BABBIE, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
3. BARNETT, M. A. (1984). Similarity of experience and empathy in preschoolers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 745, 241-250.
4. BEACH, R. (1976). Self-evaluation strategies of extensive revisers and non-revisers. College Composition and Communication, 27, 160-164.
5. BEENE, L., & KOPPLE, W. V. (1992). The Riverside handbook. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
6. BELLACK, A. S., HERSEN, M., & TURNER, S. M. (1978). Role-play tests for assessing social skills: Are they valid? Behavior Therapy, 9, 448-461.
7. BENNETT, G., & F. P. GREEN. (2001). Student learning in the online environment: No significant difference? Quest, 53, 1-13.
8. BEREITER, C., & SCARDAMALIA, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. BERKENKOTTER, C. (1984). Student writers and their sense of authority over texts. College Composition and Communication, 35, 312-319.
10. BERNER, A., BOSWELL, W., & KAHAN, N. (1994). Using the tape recorder to respond to student writers. Paper presented at SIG Writing Conference, Utrecht, Netherlands.
11. BORDIA, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 1, 99-120.
12. BROWN, J. S., & P. DUGUID. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. BRUNER, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child's concept of language (pp. 241-255). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. BRUNER, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. BURGOON, M., HUNSAKER, F. G., & DAWSON, E. (1994). Human communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. CARROLL, J., & MACK, R. L. (1984). Learning to use the word processor: By doing, by thinking, and by knowing. In J. C. Thomas & L. M. Schneider (Eds.). Human factors in computer systems (pp. 13-51). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. CARUSO, D., & WEIDENBORNER, S. (1992). Reading, responding, and writing (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
18. CHAFE, W., & DANIELEWICZ, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. Technical Report No. 5, Center for the Study of Writing, UC Berkeley.
19. CHALFONTE, B., FISH, R. S., & KRAUT, R. E. (1991). Expressive richness: A comparison of speech and text as media for revision. In Proceedings of CHI '92 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 21-26). ACM Press.
20. CIALDINI, R. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
21. CLARK, G. (1990). Dialogue, dialectic, and conversation: A social perspective on the function of writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
22. CLARK, H. H., & BRENNAN, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. CLARK, I. L. ( 1985). Audiotapes and the basic writer: A selected survey of useful materials. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 12, 120-129.
24. CLARK, T. D. (1981). Cassette tapes: An answer to the grading dilemma. The American Business Communication Association Bulletin, 44(2), 40-41.
25. COLEMAN, V. B. (1973). A comparison between the relative effectiveness of marginal-interlinear-terminal commentary and of audiotaped commentary in responding to English compositions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, no. 08A: 3945.
26. CRYER, P., & KAIKUMBA, N. (1987). Audio-cassette tape as a means of giving feedback on written work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 12, 148-153.
27. DAFT, R. L., & LENGEL, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
28. DRAGGA, S. (1991). Responding to technical writing. The Technical Writing Teacher, 18, 202-221.
29. DUBROVSKY, V. J., KIESLER, S., & SETHNA, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
30. DUNKIN, M. J., & BARNES, J. (1989). Research on teaching in higher education. In C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 754-777). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. EAGLY, A. H.,WOOD,W., & CHAIKEN, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effects of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435.
32. FERRARA, K., BRUNNER, H., & WHITTEMORE, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
33. GALEGHER, J., KRAUT, R. E., & EGIDO, C. (Eds.). (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. GEE, T. C. ( 1970). The effects of written comment on expository composition (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, no. 07A: 3412.
35. GERE, A. R., & STEVENS, R. S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 85-105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. GOULD, J. D. (1978). An experimental study of writing, dictating, and speaking. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. VII (pp. 299-319). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. GOULD, J. D. (1982). Writing and speaking letters and messages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 16, 147-171. London, UK: Academic Press.
38. HARTMAN, K., NEUWIRTH, C. M., KIESLER, S., SPROULL, L., COCHRAN, C., PALMQUIST, M., & ZUBROW, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction in learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.
39. MEHRABIAN, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
40. MOORE, G. E. (1977). Individualizing instructional feedback: A comparison of feedback modes in university classes. Paper presented at Annual International Conference for Individualized Instruction, West Lafayette, IN.
41. MURRAY, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in Cyberspace. New York: The Free Press.
42. NEUWIRTH, C., CHANDHOK, R., CHARNEY, D., WOJAHN, P., & KIM, L. (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais, & D. Olsen (Eds.), CSCW '93: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 51-57). New York: ACM Press.
43. NEUWIRTH, C., KAUFER, D., CHANDHOK, R., & MORRIS, J. (1990). Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting. In F. Halasz (Ed.), CSCW '90: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (pp. 193-195). New York: ACM Press.
44. NEUWIRTH, C. M., PALMQUIST, M., COCHRAN, C., GILLESPIE, T., HARTMAN, K., & HAJDUK, T. (1993). Why write - together - concurrently on a computer network? In B. Bruce, J. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms (pp. 209-230). NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. NYSTRAND, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Written Communication, 6, 66-85.
46. NYSTRAN'D, M. (1989a). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 66-85.
47. NYSTRAND, M. (1989b). Sharing words: The effects of readers on developing writers. Written Communication, 7, 3-24.
48. NYSTRAND, M., & BRANDT, D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. M. Anson (Eds.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 209-230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
49. O'KEEFE, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. OVIATT, S. L., & COHEN, P. R. ( 1988). Discourse structure and performance efficiency in interactive and noninteractivc spoken modalities. Technical note 454. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
51. PEARCE, G. C., & ACKLEY, R. J. (1995). Audiotaped feedback in business writing: An exploratory study. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 31-34.
52. RAGAN, T. J., & WHITE, P. R. (2001). What we have here is a failure to communicate: The criticality of writing in online instruction. Computers and Composition, 18, 399-409.
53. ROCCETTI, M., & PERUCH, E. (2000). A low-cost hardware/software architecture for voice-based long distance learning over the PSTN and the Internet. In H. Vakilzadian & C. R. Wie (Eds.), Simulation Series 2000, 32(1), 147-152. San Diego, CA: The Society for Computer Simulation International.
54. SEIDMAN, E. (1967). Marking students' compositions: Implications of achievement motivation theory (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 28, no. 07A: 2605.
55. SIMONS, H. W. (1986). Persuasion: Understanding, practice and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
56. SITKO, B. (1989). Writer's cognitive and decision processes: Revising after feedback (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, no. 02A: 0439.
57. SOMMERS, J. (1989). The effects of tape-recorded commentary on student revision. Journal of Teaching Writing, 8, 49-75.
58. SPERLING, M., & FREEDMAN, S. W. (1987). A good girl writes like a good girl: Written response and clues to the teaching/learning process. Written Communication, 4, 343-363.
59. SPROULL, L., & KIESLER, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. STRAUB, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 91-119.
61. STUBBS, M. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociologistics of reading and writing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
62. STUBBS, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. TAFT, R. (1966). Accuracy of empathic judgments of acquaintances and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 600-604.
64. VAX HORN-CHRISTOPHER, D. A. (1995). Voice-graded business communication documents. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 35-37.
65. VYGOTSKY, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1930).
66. WALLACE, D. L., & HAYES, J. R. (1992). Redefining revision for freshman. In J. R. Hayes, R. E. Young, M. L. Matchett, M. McCaffrey, C. Cochran, & T. Hajduk, (Eds.), Reading empirical research studies: The rhetoric of research (pp. 349-370). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
67. WALTHER, J. B., ANDERSON, J. F., & PARK, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
68. YARBRO, R., & ANGEVINE, B. (1982). A comparison of traditional and cassette tape English composition grading methods. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 394-396.
69. ZIRINSKY, H. B. (1977). An investigation of student awareness of teacher criteria for evaluating writing as an element in the composing process (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 01A: 0168.