Exploring Student Perceptions of Audiovisual Feedback via Screencasting in Online Courses

American Journal of Distance Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 143-156

  Mathieson, Kathleen ^a  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865390197     PISSN: 08923647     EISSN: 15389286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2012.689166     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, I. E., and J. Seaman. 2010. Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf (http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf)
2. Berge, Z. 2000. New roles for teachers and learners in online higher education. In Readings & resources in global online education, ed. G. Hart, 3-9. Melbourne, Australia: Whirligig Press. http://its.fvtc.edu/langan/BB6/BergeZane2000.pdf (http://its.fvtc.edu/langan/BB6/BergeZane2000.pdf)
3. Crooks, K. P. 1988. The impact of classroom practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58: 438-481.
4. Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M. and Rowe, P. 2008. Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3): 486-500.
5. Dorow, L. G. and Boyle, M. E. 1998. Instructor feedback for college writing assignments in introductory classes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8(1): 115-129.
6. Dron, J., Seidel, C. and Litten, G. 2004. Transactional distance in a blended learning environment. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12(2): 163-174.
7. Espasa, A. and Meneses, J. 2010. Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59: 277-292.
8. Evans, D. J. R. 2011. Using embryology screencasts: A useful addition to the student learning experience?. Anatomical Sciences Education, 4(2): 57-63.
9. Fluckiger, J., Tixier y Vigil, Y., Pasco, R. and Danielson, K. 2010. Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, 58: 136-140.
10. Giossos, Y., Koutsouba, M., Lionarakis, A. Y. and Skavantzos, K. 2009. Reconsidering Moore's transactional distance theory. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 2: 1-6.
11. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. 2008. Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of transactional distance theory. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3): 1-17.
12. Gorsky, P. and Caspi, A. 2005. A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1): 1-11.
13. Heuer, B. P., and K. P. King. 2004. Leading the band: The role of the instructor in online learning for educators. Journal of Interactive Learning Online 3. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/3.1.5.pdf (http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/3.1.5.pdf)
14. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. and Wells, J. 2007. Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2): 3-25.
15. Kartal, E. 2010. Feedback processes in multimedia language learning software. US-China Education Review, 7(4): 53-65.
16. Liu, X., Lee, S., Bonk, C. J., Su, B. and Magjuka, R. J. 2005. Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4): 29-48.
17. Lowenthal, P. R. 2010. "The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning". In Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices, Edited by: Kidd, T. 124-139. Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference.
18. Mangieri, J. 2009. Using screencasting to engage and build community with online learners. Faculty Focus (September 23). http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/using-screencasting-to-engage-and-build-community-with-online-learners/ (http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/using-screencasting-to-engage-and-build-community-with-online-learners/)
19. Moore, M. G. 1993. "Theory of transactional distance". In Theoretical principles of distance education, Edited by: Keegan, D. 22-38. New York: Routledge.
20. Moore, M. G. 2007. "The theory of transactional distance". In Handbook of distance education, 2nd, Edited by: Moore, M.G. 89-105. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Ng, H. Z. and Hussain, R. M. R. 2009. Empowering learners as the owners of feedback while YouTube-ing. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 6(4): 274-285.
22. Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199-218.
23. Orrell, J. 2006. Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4): 441-456.
24. Peterson, E. 2007. Incorporating screencasts in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3): 1-4.
25. Portney, L. G. and Watkins, M. P. 2009. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice, 3rd, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Quinton, S. and Smallbone, T. 2010. Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning. A teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1): 125-135.
27. Rae, A. M. and Cochrane, D. K. 2008. Listening to students: How to make written assessment feedback useful. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3): 217-230.
28. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. L. 1994. Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1): 36-59.
29. Shearer, R. L. 2009. Transactional distance and dialogue: An exploratory study to refine the theoretical construct of dialogue in online learning, Edited by: diss, D. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
30. Shearer, R. L. 2009. 2010. Transactional distance and dialogue in online learning. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning 2010, Madison, WI. http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/29897_10.pdf (http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/29897_10.pdf)
31. Sugar, W., Brown, A. and Luterbach, K. 2010. Examining the anatomy of a screencast: Uncovering common elements and instructional strategies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3): 1-20.
32. Tait, A. 2003. Reflections on student support in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 4 (1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/134/214 (http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/134/214)
33. Trail, M. A. and Hadley, A. 2010. Assessing the integration of information literacy into a hybrid course using screencasting. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 6(3): 647-654.
34. Udell, J. 2005. Strategic developer: Let's hear it for screencasting. New medium offers unprecedented avenues for training, discussion. InfoWorld 2 (7). http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/lets-hear-it-screencasting-725 (http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/lets-hear-it-screencasting-725)
35. Wikeley, F. and Muschamp, Y. 2004. Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance. Distance Education, 25(1): 125-142.
36. Williams, K. T. 2003. Factors affecting student retention in an online graudate certificate program: A grounded theory study, Gainesville: Ph.D. diss., University of Florida.
37. Yee, K. and Hargis, J. 2010. Screencasts. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1): 9-12.