MDcons: Intermolecular contact maps as a tool to analyze the interface of protein complexes from molecular dynamics trajectories

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Abdel Azeim, Safwat ^a   Chermak, Edrisse ^a   Vangone, Anna ^b   Oliva, Romina ^c   Cavallo, Luigi ^a,b  

^a KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES PARTHENOPE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOPHYSICS; HYDROPHILICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TRAJECTORIES;

CONFORMATIONAL ENSEMBLE; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION; INTER-RESIDUE CONTACT; INTERMOLECULAR CONTACTS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS TRAJECTORIES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN COMPLEXES; SINGLE MACROMOLECULES;

PROTEINS;

BEHAVIOR; BINDING AFFINITY; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; HYDROPHILICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONFORMATION; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84904961428     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S5-S1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Pawson T, Nash P: Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev 2000, 14: 1027-1047.
2. Wilson IA, Stanfield RL: Antibody-antigen interactions: new structures and new conformational changes. Current opinion in structural biology 1994, 4: 857-867.
3. Jones S, Thornton JM: Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93: 13-20.
4. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE: The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28: 235-242.
5. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ: Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 2007, 69: 704-718.
6. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ: Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005, 60: 150-169.
7. Karplus M, McCammon JA: Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nature structural biology 2002, 9: 646-652.
8. Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA: Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein- ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure 2001, 30: 211-243.
9. Hansson T, Oostenbrink C, van Gunsteren W: Molecular dynamics simulations. Current opinion in structural biology 2002, 12: 190-196.
10. Karplus M, Kuriyan J: Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102: 6679-6685.
11. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E: GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. Journal of chemical theory and computation 2008, 4: 435-447.
12. Gotz AW, Williamson MJ, Xu D, Poole D, Le Grand S, Walker RC: Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born. Journal of chemical theory and computation 2012, 8: 1542-1555.
13. Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, et al: GROMACS 4.5: a highthroughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 2013, 29: 845-854.
14. Schmidtke P, Bidon-Chanal A, Luque FJ, Barril X: MDpocket: open-source cavity detection and characterization on molecular dynamics trajectories. Bioinformatics 2011, 27: 3276-3285.
15. Durrant JD, de Oliveira CA, McCammon JA: POVME: an algorithm for measuring binding-pocket volumes. Journal of molecular graphics & modelling 2011, 29: 773-776.
16. Durrant JD, McCammon JA: HBonanza: a computer algorithm for molecular-dynamics-trajectory hydrogen-bond analysis. Journal of molecular graphics & modelling 2011, 31: 5-9.
17. Dixit SB, Beveridge DL: Structural bioinformatics of DNA: a web-based tool for the analysis of molecular dynamics results and structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2006, 22: 1007-1009.
18. Vangone A, Spinelli R, Scarano V, Cavallo L, Oliva R: COCOMAPS: a web application to analyze and visualize contacts at the interface of biomolecular complexes. Bioinformatics 2011, 27: 2915-2916.
19. Vangone A, Oliva R, Cavallo L: CONS-COCOMAPS: a novel tool to measure and visualize the conservation of inter-residue contacts in multiple docking solutions. Bmc Bioinformatics 2012, 13(Suppl 4): S19.
20. Oliva R, Vangone A, Cavallo L: Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts. Proteins 2013, 81: 1571-1584.
21. Vangone A, Cavallo L, Oliva R: Using a consensus approach based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts to rank CAPRI models. Proteins 2013, 81: 2210-2220.
22. Mendez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ: Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003, 52: 51-67.
23. Rodrigues JP, Trellet M, Schmitz C, Kastritis P, Karaca E, Melquiond AS, Bonvin AM: Clustering biomolecular complexes by residue contacts similarity. Proteins 2012, 80: 1810-1817.
24. Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ: Are Scoring Functions in Protein-Protein Docking Ready To Predict Interactomes? Clues from a Novel Binding Affinity Benchmark. Journal of Proteome Research 2010, 9: 2216-2225.
25. Ko TP, Liao CC, Ku WY, Chak KF, Yuan HS: The crystal structure of the DNase domain of colicin E7 in complex with its inhibitor Im7 protein. Structure with Folding & Design 1999, 7: 91-102.
26. Wang JH, Smolyar A, Tan K, Liu JH, Kim M, Sun ZY, Wagner G, Reinherz EL: Structure of a heterophilic adhesion complex between the human CD2 and CD58 (LFA-3) counterreceptors. Cell 1999, 97: 791-803.
27. Schamberger GP, Diez-Gonzalez F: Selection of recently isolated colicinogenic Escherichia coli strains inhibitory to Escherichia coli O157: H7. Journal of food protection 2002, 65: 1381-1387.
28. Murinda SE, Rashid KA, Roberts RF: In vitro assessment of the cytotoxicity of nisin, pediocin, and selected colicins on simian virus 40-transfected human colon and Vero monkey kidney cells with trypan blue staining viability assays. Journal of food protection 2003, 66: 847-853.
29. Kortemme T, Joachimiak LA, Bullock AN, Schuler AD, Stoddard BL, Baker D: Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nature structural & molecular biology 2004, 11: 371-379.
30. Joachimiak LA, Kortemme T, Stoddard BL, Baker D: Computational design of a new hydrogen bond network and at least a 300-fold specificity switch at a protein-protein interface. Journal of molecular biology 2006, 361: 195-208.
31. Ma JC, Dougherty DA: The Cationminus signpi Interaction. Chem Rev 1997, 97: 1303-1324.
32. da Silva AJ, Brickelmaier M, Majeau GR, Li Z, Su L, Hsu YM, Hochman PS: Alefacept, an immunomodulatory recombinant LFA-3/IgG1 fusion protein, induces CD16 signaling and CD2/CD16-dependent apoptosis of CD2(+) cells. J Immunol 2002, 168: 4462-4471.
33. Mrowietz U: Treatment targeted to cell surface epitopes. Clinical and experimental dermatology 2002, 27: 591-596.
34. Spitzer TR, McAfee SL, Dey BR, Colby C, Hope J, Grossberg H, Preffer F, Shaffer J, Alexander SI, Sachs DH, et al: Nonmyeloablative haploidentical stem-cell transplantation using anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody (MEDI- 507)- based conditioning for refractory hematologic malignancies. Transplantation 2003, 75: 1748-1751.
35. Braun J, Sieper J: Role of novel biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis: effects on joints and skin. BioDrugs: clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy 2003, 17: 187-199.
36. Weger W: Current status and new developments in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with biological agents. British journal of pharmacology 2010, 160: 810-820.
37. Gokhale A, Weldeghiorghis TK, Taneja V, Satyanarayanajois SD: Conformationally constrained peptides from CD2 to modulate proteinprotein interactions between CD2 and CD58. Journal of medicinal chemistry 2011, 54: 5307-5319.
38. Arulanandam AR, Moingeon P, Concino MF, Recny MA, Kato K, Yagita H, Koyasu S, Reinherz EL: A soluble multimeric recombinant CD2 protein identifies CD48 as a low affinity ligand for human CD2: divergence of CD2 ligands during the evolution of humans and mice. J Exp Med 1993, 177: 1439-1450.
39. Dustin ML: Adhesive bond dynamics in contacts between T lymphocytes and glass-supported planar bilayers reconstituted with the immunoglobulin- related adhesion molecule CD58. The Journal of biological chemistry 1997, 272: 15782-15788.
40. Recny MA, Neidhardt EA, Sayre PH, Ciardelli TL, Reinherz EL: Structural and functional characterization of the CD2 immunoadhesion domain. Evidence for inclusion of CD2 in an alpha-beta protein folding class. The Journal of biological chemistry 1990, 265: 8542-8549.
41. Sayre PH, Hussey RE, Chang HC, Ciardelli TL, Reinherz EL: Structural and binding analysis of a two domain extracellular CD2 molecule. J Exp Med 1989, 169: 995-1009.
42. Davis SJ, Davies EA, Barclay AN, Daenke S, Bodian DL, Jones EY, Stuart DI, Butters TD, Dwek RA, van der Merwe PA: Ligand binding by the immunoglobulin superfamily recognition molecule CD2 is glycosylationindependent. The Journal of biological chemistry 1995, 270: 369-375.
43. Davis SJ, Ikemizu S, Wild MK, van der Merwe PA: CD2 and the nature of protein interactions mediating cell-cell recognition. Immunol Rev 1998, 163: 217-236.
44. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE: Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 2010, 78: 1950-1958.
45. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML: Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. Journal of Chemical Physics 1983, 79: 926-935.
46. Jorgensen WL, Duffy EM, Tiradorives J: Computational Investigations of Protein Denaturation - Apomyoglobin and Chaotrope-Arene Interactions. Philos T R Soc A 1993, 345: 87-96.
47. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L: Particle Mesh Ewald - an N.Log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems. Journal of Chemical Physics 1993, 98: 10089-10092.
48. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM: LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. Journal of computational chemistry 1997, 18: 1463-1472.
49. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M: Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of chemical physics 2007, 126: 014101.
50. Parrinello M, Rahman A: Polymorphic Transitions in Single-Crystals - a New Molecular-Dynamics Method. J Appl Phys 1981, 52: 7182-7190.
51. de Groot BL, van Aalten DM, Amadei A, Berendsen HJ: The consistency of large concerted motions in proteins in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophysical journal 1996, 71: 1707-1713.
52. Amadei A, Ceruso MA, Di Nola A: On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 1999, 36: 419-424.
53. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM: 'NACCESS' Computer Program. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. University College London; 1993.