Why the bully/victim relationship is so pernicious: A gendered perspective on power and animosity among bullies and their victims

Development and Psychopathology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 689-704

  Rodkin, Philip C ^a   Hanish, Laura D ^b   Wang, Shuai ^a   Logis, Handrea A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BULLYING; CHILD; CRIME VICTIM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENT;

BULLYING; CHILD; CRIME VICTIMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PEER GROUP; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENTS;

EID: 84904801567     PISSN: 09545794     EISSN: 14692198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414000327     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahn, H.-J., Rodkin, P. C., & Gest, S. D. (2013). Teacher-stuDent agreement on "Bullies and Kids they Pick On" in elementary school classrooms: GenDer and graDe differences. Theory Into Practice, 52, 257-263
2. Andrews, N. C. Z., Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., & Santos, C. E. (2014). Aggression and social prominence in early adolescence: Why form of aggression matters. Manuscript submitted for publication
3. Barcelo, H., Hanish, L. D., White, J., Severs, C., Gosney, S., Raman, P., et al. (2012). Q-Connectivity software program. DownloaDed from http: // cocteau.la.asu.edu/cd1/login.php
4. Barcelo, H., & Laubenbacher, R (2005). Perspectives on a and its applications. Journal of Discrete Mathematics, 298, 39-61
5. Berger, C., & Rodkin, P. C. (2009). Male and female victims of male bullies: Social status differences by genDer and informant source. Sex Roles, 61, 72-84
6. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007a). Shared targets for aggression by early adolescent friends. Developmenal Psychology, 42, 1327-1338
7. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007b). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479-496
8. Card, N A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggresion in childhood and adolescence: A meta-Analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466-480
9. Card, N. A., Rodkin, P. C., & GaranDeau, C. F. (2010). A Description and illustration of the Triadic Relations MoDel: Who perceives whom as bullying whom? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 374-383
10. Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2010)We were best friends, but: Two studies of antipathetic relationships emerging from broken friendships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 499-526
11. Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.). (2006). Developmental psychopathology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
12. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & SaDek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-Analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65-83
13. Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Ku, H. (1999). Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 35, 376-385
14. Crick, N R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there'd be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 599-607
15. Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The Development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719-742
16. De Bryun, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., &Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543-566
17. Dodge, K. A., & Albert, D. (2012). Evolving science in adolescence: Comment on Ellis et al. (2012). Developmental Psychology, 48, 624-627
18. Espelage, D. L., Low, S. K., AnDerson, C., &De La Rue, L. (2013). Bullying, sexual, and dating violence trajectories from early to late adolescence. Report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, College of Education
19. Faris, R., & Felmee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and genDer segregation in same-And cross-genDer aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48-73
20. Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M., Leung, M.-C., Hall, C., Hutchins, B., & McDonough, E. (2010). Social preference, social prominence, and group membership in late elementary school: Homophilic concentration and peer affiliation configurations. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 271-293
21. GaranDeau, C. F., Wilson, T., & Rodkin, P. C. (2010). The popularity of elementary school bullies in genDer and racial context. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 119-136). New York: Routledge
22. Hafen, C. A., Laursen, B., Nurmi, J.-E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Bullies, victims, and antipathy: The feeling is mutual. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 801-809
23. Hanish, L. D., Barcelo, H., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Holmwall, J., & Palermo, F. (2007). Using the Q-connectivity method to study frequency of interaction with multiple peer triads: Do preschoolers' peer group interactions at school relate to acaDemic skills? In P. C. Rodkin&L. D. Hanish (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent Development: Social network analysis and children's peer relationships (Vol. 118, pp. 9-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
24. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or Developmental change? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17-38
25. Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., & Barcelo, H. (2008). The breadth of peer relationships among preschoolers: An application of the Q-connectivity method to externalizing behavior. Child Development, 79, 1119-1136
26. Hanish, L. D., Sallquist, J., DiDonato, M., Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (2012). Aggression by whom-Aggression toward whom: Behavioral predictors of same-And other-genDer aggression in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1450-1462
27. HinDe, R. A., & Stevenson-HinDe, J. (1987). Interpersonal relationships and child Development. Developmental Review, 7, 1-21
28. Hodges, E. V. E., Peets, K., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). A Person-Situation approach to unDerstanding aggressive behavior and unDerlying aggressogenic thought. In M. J. Harris (Ed.), Bullying, peer rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 125-150). New York: Springer
29. Kawabata, Y., & Crick, N. R. (2011). The significance of cross-racial/ethnic friendships: Associations with peer victimization, peer support, sociometric status, and classroom diversity. Developmenal Psychology, 47, 1763-1775
30. KochenDerfer-Ladd, B., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children's peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72, 134-151
31. Leff, S. S., Power, T. J., & Goldstein, A. B. (2004). Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of bullying-prevention programs in the schools. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 269-294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
32. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
33. Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., Parada, R. H., Craven, R. G., & Hamilton, L. R. (2011). Construct validity of themultidimensional structure of bullying and victimization: An application of exploratory structural equation moDeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 701-732
34. Murray-Close, D., & Crick, N. R. (2006). Mutual antipathy involvement: GenDer and associations with aggression and victimization. School Psychology Review, 35, 472-492
35. Olson, S. L. (1992). Development of conduct problems and peer rejection in preschool children: A social systems analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 327-350
36. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford: Blackwell
37. Olweus, D. (2010). UnDerstanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9-34). New York: Routledge
38. Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S. A., Wojslawowicz, J. C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child Development, and adjustment: A Developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 419-493). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
39. Pauletti, R. E., Cooper, P. J., & Perry, D. G. (in press). Influences of genDer iDentity on children's maltreatment of genDer non-conforming peers: A Person-Target analysis of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
40. Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). A longitudinal study of heterosexual relationships, aggression, and sexual harassment during the transition from primary school through middle school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 119-133
41. Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Connolly, J. A., Yulie, A., McMaster, L., &Jiang, D. (2006). A Developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 376-384
42. Robinson, J. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). Bullying explains only part of LGBTQ-heterosexual risk disparities: Implications for policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 41, 309-319
43. Rodkin, P C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? social status asymmetries by victim genDer. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 473-485
44. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24
45. Rodkin, P C., & Fischer, K. (2003). Sexual harassment and the cultures of childhood: Developmental, domestic violence, and legal perspectives. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 177-196
46. Rose, A. J., Glick, G., & Smith, R. L. (2011). Popularity and genDer: The two cultures of boys and girls. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 103-122). New York: Guilford Press
47. Ross, S W., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Bully prevention in positive behavior support. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 747-759
48. Rudolph, K. D., Lansford, J. L., & Rodkin, P. C. (in press). Interpersonal theories of Developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
49. Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Victims and their DefenDers: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144-151
50. Salmivalli, C., &Helteenvuori, T. (2007).Reactive but not proactive aggression predicts vicitmization among boys. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 198-206
51. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. ChildDevelopment, 64, 1755-1772
52. Stroheimer, D., Kärnä, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Intrapersonal and interpersonal risk factors for peer victimization in immigrant youth in Finland. Developmenal Psychology, 47, 248-258
53. Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K., et al. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 486-495
54. Veenstra, R., LinDenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., DeWinter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843-1854
55. Wolke, D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., & Costello, J. (2013). Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science, 24, 1958-1970
56. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Pronk, R. E., Goodwin, B., Mastro, S., & Crick, N. R. (2013). Connected and isolated victims of relational aggression: Associations with peer group status and differences between girls and boys. Sex Roles, 68, 363-377.