A description and illustration of the Triadic Relations Model: Who perceives whom as bullying whom?

International Journal of Behavioral Development

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 374-383

  Card, Noel A ^a   Rodkin, Philip C ^b   Garandeau, Claire F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

aggressive behavior; perception; victimization

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; BULLYING; CHILD; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VICTIM;

EID: 77954080583     PISSN: 01650254     EISSN: 14640651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165025410371418     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Berger, C., & Rodkin, P.C. (2009). Male and female victims of male bullies: Social status differences by gender and informant source. Sex Role, 61, 72-84.
2. Bond, C.F., Jr., Horn, E.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1997). A model for triadic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 79-94.
3. Bond, C.F., Jr., Kenny, D.A., Broome, E.H., Stokes-Zoota, J.J., & Richard, F.D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of triadic relations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 397-426.
4. Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Card, N.A., & Hodges, E.V.E. (2006). Shared targets for aggression by early adolescent friends. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1, 327-321, 338.
6. Card, N.A., & Hodges, E.V.E. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479-496.
7. Card, N.A., & Hodges, E.V.E. (in press). It takes two to fight in school too: A social relations model of the psychometric properties and relative variance of dyadic aggression and victimization in middle school. Social Development.
8. Card, N.A., Hodges, E.V.E., Little, T.D., & Hawley, P.H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 146-155.
9. Card, N.A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E.V.E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: Recommendations for prevention and intervention. In J.E. Zins, M.J. Elias, & C.A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 339-366). New York: Haworth Press.
10. Card, N.A., Little, T.D., & Selig, J.P. (2008). Using the bivariate Social Relations Model to study dyadic relationships: Early adolescents' perceptions of friends' aggression and prosocial behaviors. In N.A. Card, J.P. Selig, & T.D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 245-276). New York: Routledge.
11. Card, N.A., Selig, J.P., & Little, T.D. (Eds.) (2008). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
12. Card, N.A., Stucky, B.D., Sawalani, G.M., & Little, T.D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1, 185-181, 229.
13. Coie, J.D., Cillessen, A.H.N., Dodge, K.A., Hubbard, J.A., Schwartz, D., Lemerise, E.A., et al. (1999). It takes two to fight: A test of relational factors and a method of assessing aggressive dyads. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1, 179-171, 188.
14. Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 779-862). New York: Wiley.
15. Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D.A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.
16. Garandeau, C.F., Wilson, T., & Rodkin, P.C. (2010). The popularity of elementary school bullies in gender and racial context. In S.R. Jimerson, S.M. Swearer, & D.L. Espelage (Eds.), The international handbook of school bullying (pp. 119-136). New York: Routledge.
17. Hubbard, J.A., Dodge, K.A., Cillessen, A.H.N., Coie, J.D., & Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 268-280.
18. Kenny, D.A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
19. Kenny, D.A., Albright, L., Malloy, T.E., & Kashy, D.A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258.
20. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
21. Kenny, D.A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22. Kenny, D.A., Mohr, C.D., & Levesque, M.J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
23. Kenny, D.A., West, T.V., Cillessen, A.H.N., Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., Hubbard, J.A., et al. (2007). Accuracy in judgments of aggressiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1, 225-221, 236.
24. LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (1999). Children's interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160, 225-242.
25. Lashley, B.R., & Bond, C.F., Jr. (1997). Significance testing for round-robin data. Psychological Methods, 2, 278-291.
26. Laursen, B. (2005). Dyadic and group perspectives on close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 97-100.
27. Little, T.D., & Card, N.A. (2005). On the use of social relations and actor-partner interdependence models in developmental research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 173-179.
28. Malloy, T.E., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199-225.
29. Malloy, T.E., Sugarman, D.B., Montvilo, R.K., & Ben-Zeev, T. (1995). Children's interpersonal perceptions: A social relations analysis of perceiver and target effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 418-426.
30. Malloy, T.E., Yarlas, A., Montvilo, R.K., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perceptions: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 692-702.
31. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Peets, K., Hodges, E.V.E., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Affect-congruent social-cognitive evaluations and behaviors. Child Development, 79, 170-185.
33. Pierce, K.A., & Cohen, R. (1995). Aggressors and their victims: Toward a contextual framework for understanding children's aggressor- victim relationships. Developmental Review, 15, 292-310.
34. Rodkin, P.C., & Ahn, H-J. (2009). Social networks derived from affiliations and friendships, multi-informant and self-reports: Stability, concordance, placement of aggressive and unpopular children, and centrality. Social Development, 18, 556-576.
35. Rodkin, P.C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 473-485.
36. Rodkin, P.C., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2006). They're cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175-204.
37. Rodkin, P.C., Wilson, T., & Ahn, H-J. (2007). Social integration between African American and European American children in majority Black, majority White, and multicultural elementary classrooms. In P.C. Rodkin & L.D. Hanish (Eds.), Social network analysis and children's peer relationships (pp. 25-42). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Sumrall, S.G., Ray, G.E., & Tidwell, P.S. (2000). Evaluations of relational aggression as a function of relationships type and conflict setting. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 179-191.
39. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B., De Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1, 843-841, 854.