Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1044-1052

  Risko, Evan F ^a   Blais, Chris ^b   Stolz, Jennifer A ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional control; Compatibility effects; Selective attention; Strategic control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 58149130338     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.1044     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Borgmann K.W.U., Risko E.F., Stolz J.A., Besner D. Simon says: Reliability and the role of working memory and attentional control in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:313-319.
2. Cohen A., Fuchs A., Bar-Sela A., Brumberg Y., Magen H. Correlational cuing as a function of target complexity and target-flanker similarity. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:275-290.
3. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: The strategic control of the activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:480-506.
4. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research 1994, 56:261-268.
5. Hommel B., Colzato L.S. Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:483-521.
6. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
7. Keele S.W. Attention and human performance 1973, Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, CA.
8. Kornblum S. Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. Psychological Review 1969, 76:112-131.
9. Lindsay D.S., Jacoby L.L. Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:219-234.
10. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:166-174.
11. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J., Williamson J. Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1984, 22:135-138.
12. Long D.L., Prat C.S. Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:294-301.
13. Mayr U., Awh E., Laurey P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:450-452.
14. Merikle P.M., Joordens S. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 1997, 6:219-236.
15. Neill W.T. Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:444-450.
16. E-Prime (Version 1.1) [Computer software] 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Author, Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Schröter H., Soetens E., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
18. Ullsperger M., Bylsma L.M., Botvinick M.M. The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 5:467-472.
19. Van Selst M., Jolicœur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1994, 47(A):631-650.