Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field

Biological Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 191-209

  Corballis, Paul M ^a   Gratton, Gabriele ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Divided visual field paradigm; Hemispheric organization; Noise compatibility paradigm; Processing strategies

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0242352675     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00109-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Banich M.T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex. 26:1990;77-94.
2. Belger A., Banich M.T. Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;923-931.
3. Broadbent, D.E., 1958. Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, London, UK.
4. Delis D.C., Robertson L.C., Efron R. Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia. 24:1986;205-214.
5. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review. 70:1963;80-90.
6. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 113:1984;501-517.
7. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics. 16:1974;143-149.
8. Eriksen C.W., Schultz D.W. Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics. 25:1979;249-263.
9. Eriksen C.W., Yeh Y.-Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11:1985;583-597.
10. Fendrich R., Wessinger C.M., Gazzaniga M.S. Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: investigations with a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia. 34:1996;637-646.
11. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11:1988;331-343.
12. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 121:1992;481-507.
13. Gratton G., Corballis P.M., Jain S. Hemispheric organization of visual memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9:1997;92-104.
14. Gratton G., Fabiani M., Goodman-Wood M.R., DeSoto M.C. Memory-driven processing in human medial occipital cortex: an Event-Related Optical Signal (EROS) study. Psychophysiology. 38:1998;348-351.
15. Hellige, J.B., 1996. Divided visual field techniques. In: Beaumont, J.G., Knealy, P.M., Rogers, M.J.C. (Eds.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Neuropsychology. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
16. Jonides J. Further toward a model of the mind's eye's movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 21:1983;247-250.
17. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B. The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;175-219.
18. Kramer A.F., Jacobsen A. Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics. 50:1991;267-284.
19. Kramer A.F., Hahn S. Splitting the beam: distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science. 6:1995;381-386.
20. Lamb M.R., Robertson L.C., Knight R.T. Attention and interference in the processing of hierarchical patterns: inferences from patients with right and left temporal-parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;471-483.
21. Lamb M.R., Robertson L.C., Knight R.T. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: Inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 16:1990;471-483.
22. Mondor T.A., Bryden M.P. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. Human Experimental Psychology. 44A:1992;529-555.
23. Neisser U. Decision-time without reaction-time: experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology. 76:1963;376-385.
24. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113.
25. Ringo J.L., Doty R.W., Demeter S., Simard P.Y. Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cerebral Cortex. 4:1994;331-343.
26. Schneider W. Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. 17th annual meeting of the Society for Computers in Psychology, Behavioral Research Methods. Instruments and Computers. 20:1988;206-217.
27. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review. 84:1977;1-66.
28. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 2. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review. 84:1977;127-190.
29. Sternberg, S., 1969. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. In: Koster, W.G. (Ed.), Attention and Performance II. North Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 276-315.
30. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
31. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review. 95:1988;15-48.
32. Yantis S., Johnston J.C. On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;135-149.