On the locus of priming and inverse priming effects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 975-991

  Mattler, Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845685027     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193359     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BREITMEYER, B. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. DEHAENE, S., NACCACHE, L., LE CLEC'H, G., KOECHLIN, E., MUELLER, M., DEHAENE-LAMBERTZ, G., ET AL. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.
3. EIMER, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
4. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
5. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520.
6. EIMER, M., SCHUBÖ, A., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 3-10.
7. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
8. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & SCHULTZ, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
10. FRANCIS, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 104, 572-594.
11. GRICE, G. R., & GWYNNE, J. W. (1985). Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 495-501.
12. KLAPP, S. T. (2005). Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: Comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 431-435.
13. KLAPP, S. T., & HAAS, B. W. (2005). Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 193-209.
14. KLAPP, S. T., & HINKLEY, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
15. KLOTZ, W., & NEUMANN, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 976-992.
16. LEUTHOLD, H., & KOPP, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
17. LINGNAU, A., & VORBERG, D. (2005). The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 545-557.
18. LLERAS, A., & ENNS, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
19. LLERAS, A., & ENNS, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: A reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
20. MATTLER, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
21. MATTLER, U. (2005). Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 285-300.
22. MATTLER, U. (in press). Inverse target and cue priming effects of masked stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
23. MILLER, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.
24. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
25. NEUMANN, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
26. NEUMANN, O., & KLOTZ, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 124-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
27. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
28. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.
29. SCHMIDT, T. (2000). Visual perception without awareness: Priming responses by color. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 157-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. SCHMIDT, T. (2002). The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 112-118.
31. VERLEGER, R., JASKOWSKI, P., AYDEMIR, A., VAN DER LUBBE, R. H. J., & GROEN, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515.
32. VORBERG, D. (1998). Reaktionen auf unbewusste visuelle Reize: Umkehr von Bahnung in Hemmung [Responses to conscious visual stimuli: reversal of priming into inhibition]. In H. Lachnit, A. Jacobs, & F. Rösler (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie: Abstracts der 40. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 386). Lengerich: Pabst.
33. VORBERG, D. (2000). Wann wirken bewusste Reize anders als unbewusste? [When do conscious stimuli behave differently than unconscious stimuli?]. In H. H. Bülthoff, M. Fahle, K. R. Gegenfurtner, & H. A. Mallot (Eds.), Beiträge zur 3. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz (p. 33). Kirchentellinsfurt: Knirsch.
34. VORBERG, D., MATTLER, U., HEINECKE, A., SCHMIDT, T., & SCHWARZBACH, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275-6280.
35. VORBERG, D., MATTLER, U., HEINECKE, A., SCHMIDT, T., & SCHWARZBACH, J. (2004). Invariant time course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaembach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 271-288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. WOLFF, P. (1989). Einfluss des maskierten Testreizes auf die Wahlreaktion auf den Maskierreiz bei Metakontrast. Paper presented at the 31. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Bamberg, Germany.