Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 82-91

  Reuss, Heiko ^a   Pohl, Carsten ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

arrow cues; attention; contingent capture; masked priming; spatial cuing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855919692     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ansorge, U. (2006). Die Rolle von Absichten bei der automatischen Verarbeitung visuell-räumlicher Information [The role of intentions for the automatic processing of visuo-spatial attention]. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 2-12. (Pubitemid 43416142)
2. Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2006). Shifts of visuospatial attention to invisible (metacontrast-masked) singletons: Clues from reaction times and event-related potentials. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 61-76.
3. Ansorge, U., Heumann, M., & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of vi-sibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cueing task. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545. (Pubitemid 36009188)
4. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Worschech, F. (2010). Attentional capture by masked color singletons. Vision Research, 50, 2015-2027.
5. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648-653.
6. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777. (Pubitemid 41323169)
7. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509-540.
9. Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46, 67-71. (Pubitemid 27356721)
10. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. (Pubitemid 128458902)
11. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. (Pubitemid 128457481)
12. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
13. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
14. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490-495. (Pubitemid 128457708)
15. Friesen, C. K., Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 319-329. (Pubitemid 38422588)
16. Gibson, B. S., & Bryant, T. A. (2005). Variation in cue duration reveals top-down modulation of involuntary orienting to uninformative symbolic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 749-758. (Pubitemid 41649932)
17. Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d'. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 289-297.
18. Held, B., Ansorge, U., & Müller, H. (2010). Masked singleton effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2069-2086.
19. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360-365. (Pubitemid 33653544)
20. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2003). Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings. Journal of Vision, 3, 32-40. (Pubitemid 39047356)
21. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long, & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention & performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
23. Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.
24. Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 184-198.
25. Kiesel, A. (2009). Unbewusste Wahrnehmung: Handlungs-determinierende Reizerwartungen bestimmen die Wirksamkeit subliminaler Reize [Unconscious perception: Action-determining stimulus expectancies determine the influence of subliminal stimuli]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 215-228.
26. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Unconscious priming according to multiple S-Rrules. Cognition, 104, 89-105. (Pubitemid 46627562)
27. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on target set size. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 37-45.
28. Kiesel, A., Wagener, A., Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., Fallgatter, A., & Stöcker, C. (2006). Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 397-408. (Pubitemid 43729553)
29. Klapp, S. (2009). Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: Strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1366-1376.
30. Klapp, S. T., & Haas, B. W. (2005). The non-conscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 193-209. (Pubitemid 40306523)
31. Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
32. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-47. (Pubitemid 30182530)
33. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223-242. (Pubitemid 36579315)
34. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2005). On the masking and disclosure of unconscious elaborate processing: A reply to Van Opstal, Reynvoet, & Verguts. Cognition, 97, 99-105. (Pubitemid 41283887)
35. Kunde, W., Skirde, S., & Weigelt, M. (2011). Trust my face: Cognitive factors of head fakes in sports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 110-127.
36. Lambert, A., Naikar, N., McLachlan, K., & Aitken, V. (1999). A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 321-340.
37. Langton, S. R. H., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541-567.
38. Langton, S. R. H., Watt, R. J., & Bruce, V. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50-59. (Pubitemid 30089267)
39. Martens, U., & Kiefer, M. (2009). Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 56-68.
40. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180. (Pubitemid 127456162)
41. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779-788. (Pubitemid 47456979)
42. Mulckhuyse, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Unconscious attentional orienting to exogenous cues: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 134, 299-309.
43. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
44. Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Early and late selection in unconscious information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 268-285.
45. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
46. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
49. Pratt, J., Radulescu, P., Guo, R. M., & Hommel, B. (2010). Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1321-1324.
50. Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307. (Pubitemid 33610249)
51. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40. (Pubitemid 17032739)
52. Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-1360.
53. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363. (Pubitemid 36555757)
54. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation. Psychological Research, 67, 184-196. (Pubitemid 38284619)
55. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 463-468. (Pubitemid 39234115)
56. Schlaghecken, F., Klapp, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2009). Either or neither, but not both: Locating the effects of masked primes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 515-521.
57. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime users' guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
58. Stevens, S. A., West, G. L., Al-Aidroos, N., Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Testing whether gaze cues and arrow cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1148-1153.
59. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
60. Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314-318.
61. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
62. Treisman, A., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 333-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275-6280. (Pubitemid 36576966)
64. Vossel, S., Thiel, C. M., & Fink, G. R. (2006). Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 32, 1257-1264. (Pubitemid 44278690)
65. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
66. Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812-825.