Item-Specific Adaptation and the Conflict-Monitoring Hypothesis: A Computational Model

Psychological Review

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1076-1086

  Blais, Chris ^a   Robidoux, Serje ^a   Risko, Evan F ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

conflict; conflict monitoring; control; Stroop

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONFLICT; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS;

EID: 36049005270     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., and Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 624-652
2. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., and Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 539-546
3. Brown T.L., Gore C.L., and Carr T.H. Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: Is word recognition "automatic"?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (2002) 220-240
4. Carter, C. S., MacDonald, A. M., Ross, L. L., Stenger, V. A., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic versus evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 1944-1948.
5. Cheesman J., and Merikle P.M. Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 40 (1986) 343-367
6. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., and McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 332-361
7. Cohen J.D., and Huston T.A. Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In: Umilta C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (1994), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 453-476
8. Dishon-Berkovits M., and Algom D. The Stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be. Memory & Cognition 28 (2000) 1437-1449
9. Gobell S.M., Rushworth M.F., and Walsh V. Inferior parietal rTMS affects performance in an addition task. Cortex 42 (2006) 774-781
10. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., and Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (1992) 480-506
11. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2554-2558.
12. Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D.S., and Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 638-644
13. Jacoby L.L., McElree B., and Trainham T.N. Automatic influences as accessibility bias in memory and Stroop tasks: Toward a formal model. In: Gopher D., and Koriat A. (Eds). Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance. Interaction of theory and application (1999), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 461-486
14. Kanne S.M., Balota D.A., Spieler D.H., and Faust M.E. Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 174-187
15. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald III A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., and Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303 (2004, February 13) 1023-1026
16. Lindsay D.S., and Jacoby L.L. Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 219-234
17. Link S.W. The relative judgment theory of two-choice response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12 (1975) 114-135
18. Logan G.D., and Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition 7 (1979) 166-174
19. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109 (1991) 163-203
20. Mayr U., Awh E., and Laurey P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 6 (2003) 450-452
21. Nieuwenhuis S.T., Stins J.F., Posthuma D., Polderman J.C., Boomsma D.I., and de Geus E.J. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the Flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?. Memory & Cognition 34 (2006) 1260-1272
22. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 59-108
23. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., and McClelland J.L. A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In: Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition 1 (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 45-76
24. Schmidt J.R., Crump M.J., Cheesman J., and Besner D. Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Conscious Cognition 16 (2007) 421-435
25. Trainham T.N., Lindsay D.S., and Jacoby L.L. Stroop process dissociations: Reply to Hillstrom and Logan (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1579-1587
26. Tzelgov J., Henik A., and Berger J. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition 20 (1992) 727-735
27. Ullsperger M., Bylsma L.M., and Botvinick M.M. The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5 (2005) 467-472
28. van Meel C.S., Heslenfeld D.J., Oosterlaan J., and Sergeant J.A. Adaptive control deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The role of error processing. Psychiatry Research 151 (2007) 211-220
29. Yeung N., Botvinick M.M., and Cohen J.D. The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 931-959
30. Yeung N., and Cohen J.D. The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring: Predictable dissociations between the ERN and N2. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 164-171