Distinct MEG correlates of conscious experience, perceptual reversals and stabilization during binocular rivalry

NeuroImage

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 161-175

  Sandberg, Kristian ^a,b,c   Barnes, Gareth Robert ^d   Bahrami, Bahador ^c,e   Kanai, Ryota ^c,f   Overgaard, Morten ^a   Rees, Geraint ^c,d  

^a Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit Hammel Rehabilitation and Research Center ^*  (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d WELLCOME TRUST CENTRE FOR NEUROIMAGING   (United Kingdom)

^e AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^f Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science School of Psychology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Consciousness; Magnetoencephalography; MEG; Perceptual reversals; Stabilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONSCIOUS PERCEPTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION STABILIZATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTUAL REVERSAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; BRAIN CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; MONOCULAR VISION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903901129     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:13-21.
2. Blake R., Wilson H. Binocular vision. Vis. Res. 2011, 51:754-770.
3. Breese B.B. On inhibition. Psychol. Monogr. 1899, 3:1-65.
4. Britz J., Pitts M.A. Perceptual reversals during binocular rivalry: ERP components and their concomitant source differences. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1490-1499.
5. Britz J., Landis T., Michel C.M. Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:55-65.
6. Britz J., Pitts M.A., Michel C.M. Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32:1432-1442.
7. Busch N.A., Fründ I., Herrmann C.S. Electrophysiological evidence for different types of change detection and change blindness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1852-1869.
8. Carmel D., Walsh V., Lavie N., Rees G. Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R799-R800.
9. Carter O., Cavanagh P. Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e343.
10. Chatfield C., Collins A.J. Introduction to multivariate analysis 1980, Chapman and Hall.
11. Chen X., He S. Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:1013-1017.
12. Cosmelli D., David O., Lachaux J.-P., Martinerie J., Garnero L., Renault B., Varela F. Waves of consciousness: Ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry. NeuroImage 2004, 23:128-140.
13. De Graaf T.A., de Jong M.C., Goebel R., van Ee R., Sack A.T. On the functional relevance of frontal cortex for passive and voluntarily controlled bistable vision. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:2322-2331.
14. De Jong M.C., Knapen T., van Ee R. Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e30595.
15. De Jong M.C., Kourtzi Z., van Ee R. Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 36:3718-3731.
16. Dehaene S., Kerszberg M., Changeux J.P. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:14529-14534.
17. Dehaene S., Changeux J.-P., Naccache L., Sackur J., Sergent C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:204-211.
18. Ehm W., Bach M., Kornmeier J. Ambiguous figures and binding: EEG frequency modulations during multistable perception. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:547-558.
19. Fahrenfort J.J., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1488-1497.
20. Friston K., Mattout J., Trujillo-Barreto N., Ashburner J., Penny W. Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. NeuroImage 2007, 34:220-234.
21. Friston K.J., Chu C., Mourão-Miranda J., Hulme O., Rees G., Penny W., Ashburner J. Bayesian decoding of brain images. NeuroImage 2008, 39:181-205.
22. Friston K.J., Harrison L., Daunizeau J., Kiebel S., Phillips C., Trujillo-Barreto N., Henson R., Flandin G., Mattout J. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. NeuroImage 2008, 39:1104-1120.
23. Haynes J.-D., Rees G. Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1301-1307.
24. Hohwy J., Roepstorff A., Friston K. Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. Cognition 2008, 108(3):687-701. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010.PMID:18649876.
25. Isoglu-Alkaç U., Basar-Eroglu C., Ademoglu A., Demiralp T., Miener M., Stadler M. Alpha activity decreases during the perception of Necker cube reversals: An application of wavelet transform. Biol. Cybern. 2000, 82:313-320.
26. Kaernbach C., Schröger E., Jacobsen T., Roeber U. Effects of consciousness on human brain waves following binocular rivalry. Neuroreport 1999, 10:713-716.
27. Kamphuisen A., Bauer M., van Ee R. No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex. J. Vis. 2008, 8:4.1-4.8.
28. Kanai R., Bahrami B., Rees G. Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1626-1630.
29. Kanai R., Carmel D., Bahrami B., Rees G. Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R106-R107.
30. Kappenman E.S., Luck S.J. The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(5):888-904.
31. Klink P.C., Brascamp J.W., Blake R., van Wezel R.J.A. Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1464-1469.
32. Knapen T., Brascamp J., Pearson J., van Ee R., Blake R. The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:10293-10301.
33. Koivisto M. Independence of visual awareness from the scope of attention: An electrophysiological study. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 16:415-424.
34. Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. Event-related brain potential correlates of visual awareness. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:922-934.
35. Kornmeier J., Bach M. Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: Evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:1-8.
36. Kornmeier J., Bach M. The Necker cube-An ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vis. Res. 2005, 45:955-960.
37. Kornmeier J., Bach M. Bistable perception - Along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006, 62:345-349.
38. Kornmeier J., Bach M. Ambiguous figures - What happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:51.
39. Kornmeier J., Pfäffle M., Bach M. Necker cube: Stimulus-related (low-level) and percept-related (high-level) EEG signatures early in occipital cortex. J. Vis. 2011, 11:12.
40. Leopold D.A., Wilke M., Maier A., Logothetis N.K. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:605-609.
41. Litvak V., Friston K. Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies. NeuroImage 2008, 42:1490-1498.
42. Liu Y., Paradis A.-L., Yahia-Cherif L., Tallon-Baudry C. Activity in the lateral occipital cortex between 200 and 300ms distinguishes between physically identical seen and unseen stimuli. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:211.
43. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 1998, 280:1930-1934.
44. Noest A.J., van Ee R., Nijs M.M., van Wezel R.J. Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. JOV 2007, 7:1-14.
45. Nolte G. The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Phys. Med. Biol. 2003, 48:3637-3652.
46. O'Donnell B.F., Hendler T., Squires N.K. Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the Necker cube. Psychophysiology 1988, 25:137-143.
47. O'Shea R.P., Crassini B. Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 1984, 36:266-276.
48. O'Shea R.P., Kornmeier J., Roeber U. Predicting visual consciousness electrophysiologically from intermittent binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e76134.
49. Orbach J., Ehrlich D., Heath H. Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation". Percept. Mot. Skills 1963, 17:439-458.
50. Parkkonen L., Andersson J., Hämäläinen M., Hari R. Early visual brain areas reflect the percept of an ambiguous scene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:20500-20504.
51. Pearson J., Brascamp J.W. Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:334-341.
52. Pearson J., Clifford C. Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. J. Vis. 2004, 4:196-202.
53. Pitts M.A., Nerger J.L., Davis T.J.R. Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. J. Vis. 2007, 7:6.
54. Pitts M.A., Martínez A., Stalmaster C., Nerger J.L., Hillyard S.A. Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:694-702.
55. Roeber U., Widmann A., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Herrmann C.S., O'Shea R.P., Schröger E. Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: Time and place from event-related brain potentials. J. Vis. 2008, 8:21.1-21.12.
56. Roeber U., Veser S., Schröger E., O'Shea R.P. On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: Electrophysiological evidence. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e22612.
57. Sandberg K., Bahrami B., Lindelov J.K., Overgaard M., Rees G. The impact of stimulus complexity and frequency swapping on stabilization of binocular rivalry. J. Vis. 2011, 11:1-10.
58. Sandberg K., Bahrami B., Kanai R., Barnes G.R., Overgaard M., Rees G. Early visual responses predict conscious face perception within and between subjects during binocular rivalry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25(6):969-985. 10.1162/jocn_a_00353.
59. Schoffelen J.-M., Gross J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:1857-1865.
60. Schwiedrzik C.M., Ruff C.C., Lazar A., Leitner F.C., Singer W., Melloni L. Untangling perceptual memory: Hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 24(5):1152-1164. 10.1093/cercor/bhs396.
61. Sergent C., Dehaene S. Neural processes underlying conscious perception: Experimental findings and a global neuronal workspace framework. J. Physiol. Paris 2004, 98:374-384.
62. Sergent C., Baillet S., Dehaene S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1391-1400.
63. Srinivasan R., Russell D.P., Edelman G.M., Tononi G. Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1999, 19:5435-5448.
64. Stephan K.E., Penny W.D., Daunizeau J., Moran R.J., Friston K.J. Bayesian model selection for group studies. NeuroImage 2009, 46:1004-1017.
65. Sterzer P., Kleinschmidt A. A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:323-328.
66. Sterzer P., Rees G. A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:389-399.
67. Tong F., Meng M., Blake R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 2006, 10:502-511.
68. Tononi G., Srinivasan R., Russell D.P., Edelman G.M. Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:3198-3203.
69. Vanni S., Revonsuo A., Saarinen J., Hari R. Visual awareness of objects correlates with activity of right occipital cortex. Neuroreport 1996, 8:183-186.
70. Wilson H.R. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vis. Res. 2007, 47:2741-2750.
71. Wolfe J.M. Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 1983, 12:447-456.