Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition

PLoS ONE

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Carter, Olivia ^a,b   Cavanagh, Patrick ^a,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548494638     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000343     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wheatstone C (1838) On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 128: 371-394.
2. Blake R, Logothetis N (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-21.
3. Logothetis NK (1998) Single units and conscious vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1801-1818.
4. Maier A, Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold AD (2003) Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Curr Biol 13: 1076-1085.
5. Carney T, Shadlen M, Switkes E (1987) Parallel processing of motion and colour information. Nature 328: 647-649.
6. Fang F, He S (2005) Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature neuroscience 8: 1380-1385.
7. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in cognitive sciences 10: 502-511.
8. Levelt W.J (1965) On Binocular Rivalry. In Institute for Perception RVO-TNO. (Soesterberg, The Netherlands).
9. Levelt WJ (1967) Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br J Psychol 58: 143-145.
10. Blake R, Sobel KV, Gilroy LA (2003) Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron 39: 869-878.
11. Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A, Logothetis NK (2002) Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature neuroscience 5: 605-509.
12. Wolfe JM (1983) Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 12: 447-456.
13. Pearson J, Clifford CG (2004) Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. J Vis 4: 196-202.
14. Chen X, He S (2004) Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Curr Biol 14: 1013-1017.
15. Mitchell J, Stoner G, Reynolds J (2004) Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429: 410-413.
16. Chong SC, Blake R (2006) Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Res 46: 1794-1803.
17. Breitmeyer BG (1984) Visual Masking, (UK: Oxford University Press).
18. Hupe JM, Rubin N (2003) The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res 43: 531-548.
19. Chen X, He S (2003) Temporal characteristics of binocular rivalry: visual field asymmetries. Vision Res 43: 2207-2212.
20. O'Shea R, Corballis P (2001) Binocular rivalry between complex stimuli in split-brain observers. Brain and Mind 2: 151-160.
21. Wolfe JM (1984) Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Res 24: 471-478.
22. Tsuchiya N, Koch C (2005) Continuous flash suppression reduces negative after images. Nature neuroscience 8: 1096-1101.