Untangling perceptual memory: Hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1152-1164

  Schwiedrzik, Caspar M ^a,b,h   Ruff, Christian C ^c,d   Lazar, Andreea ^a,e   Leitner, Frauke C ^a,b,f,i   Singer, Wolf ^a,b,e,g   Melloni, Lucia ^a,b,g  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b Brain Imaging Center   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e FRANKFURT INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Germany)

^f University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

^g ERNST STRÜNGMANN INSTITUTE ESI FOR NEUROSCIENCE IN COOPERATION WITH MAX PLANCK SOCIETY   (Germany)

^h ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptation; Bayesian model; functional magnetic resonance imaging; hysteresis; perceptual memory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE POSITION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS; BLOOD; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; EYE MOVEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VASCULARIZATION; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

OXYGEN;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; NERVE NET; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898914120     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs396     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alink A, Schwiedrzik CM, Kohler A, Singer W, Muckli L. 2010. Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 30:2960-2966.
2. Anstis S, Verstraten FA, Mather G. 1998. The motion aftereffect. Trends Cogn Sci. 2:111-117.
3. Barlow HB. 1990. A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects. In: Blakemore C, editor. Vision: coding and efficiency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 363-375.
4. Beauchamp MS. 2003. Detection of eye movements from fMRI data. Magn Reson Med. 49:376-380.
5. Blake R, Fox R. 1974. Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature. 249:488-490.
6. Blake R, Sobel KV, Gilroy LA. 2003. Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron. 39:869-878.
7. Brascamp JW, Pearson J, Blake R, van den Berg AV. 2009. Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. J Vis. 9(3):1-23.
8. Carandini M, Movshon JA, Ferster D. 1998. Pattern adaptation and cross-orientation interactions in the primary visual cortex. Neuro-pharmacology. 37:501-511.
9. Chen X, He S. 2004. Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Curr Biol. 14:1013-1017.
10. Chen X, He S. 2003. Temporal characteristics of binocular rivalry: visual field asymmetries. Vision Res. 43:2207-2212.
11. Chikkerur S, Serre T, Tan C, Poggio T. 2010. What and where: a Baye-sian inference theory of attention. Vision Res. 50:2233-2247.
12. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:201-215.
13. Cornette L, Dupont P, Orban GA. 2002. The neural substrate of orientation short-term memory and resistance to distractor items. Eur J Neurosci. 15:165-175.
14. Cornette L, Dupont P, Salmon E, Orban GA. 2001. The neural substrate of orientation working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 13:813-828.
15. Cousineau D. 2005. Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 1:42-45.
16. Dehaene S, Changeux JP, Naccache L, Sackur J, Sergent C. 2006. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:204-211.
17. den Ouden HE, Friston KJ, Daw ND, McIntosh AR, Stephan KE. 2009. A dual role for prediction error in associative learning. Cereb Cortex. 19:1175-1185.
18. Eckert MA, Menon V, Walczak A, Ahlstrom J, Denslow S, Horwitz A, Dubno JR. 2009. At the heart of the ventral attention system: the right anterior insula. Hum Brain Mapp. 30:2530-2541.
19. Edelman GM, Gally JA, Baars BJ. 2011. Biology of consciousness. Front Psychol. 2:4.
20. Faillenot I, Decety J, Jeannerod M. 1999. Human brain activity related to the perception of spatial features of objects. Neuroimage. 10:114-124.
21. Faillenot I, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Orban GA. 2001. Orientation discrimination of objects and gratings compared: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 13:585-596.
22. Fang F, Kersten D, Murray SO. 2008. Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex. J Vis. 8:2.1-9.
23. Fecteau JH, Munoz DP. 2003. Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:435-443.
24. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. 1987. Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. J Neu-rophysiol. 57:889-920.
25. Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME. 2006. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:10046-10051.
26. Friston KJ. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:815-836.
27. Gepshtein S, Kubovy M. 2005. Stability and change in perception: spatial organization in temporal context. Exp Brain Res. 160:487-495.
28. Gibson JJ, Radner M. 1937. Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. J Exp Psychol. 20:453-467.
29. Gigante G, Mattia M, Braun J, Del Giudice P. 2009. Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels. PLoS Comput Biol. 5:e1000430.
30. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. 2007. The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci. 30:535-574.
31. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
32. Handwerker DA, Ollinger JM, D'Esposito M. 2004. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage. 21:1639-1651.
33. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE. 2003. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 157:364-375.
34. Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Ungerleider LG. 2008. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat Rev Neuro-sci. 9:467-479.
35. Hock HS, Schöner G, Hochstein S. 1996. Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions. Vision Res. 36:3311-3323.
36. Howell DC. 2002. Statistical methods for psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury/Thomson Learning.
37. James TW, Gauthier I. 2006. Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity. Hum Brain Mapp. 27:37-46.
38. Kanai R, Verstraten FA. 2006. Attentional modulation of perceptual stabilization. Proc Biol Sci. 273:1217-1222.
39. Kanai R, Verstraten FA. 2005. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Res. 45:3109-3116.
40. Kleinschmidt A, Büchel C, Hutton C, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. 2002. The neural structures expressing perceptual hysteresis in visual letter recognition. Neuron. 34:659-666.
41. Knapen T, Brascamp J, Adams WJ, Graf EW. 2009. The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. J Vis. 9: 16.11-12.
42. Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R. 2001. An efficient algorithm for topologi-cally correct segmentation of the cortical sheet in anatomical MR volumes. Neuroimage. 14:329-346.
43. Kubovy M, Wagemans J. 1995. Grouping by proximity and multi-stability in dot lattices: a quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychol Sci. 6:225-234.
44. Levitt JB, Kiper DC, Movshon JA. 1994. Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. J Neurophysiol. 71:2517-2542.
45. Liang KY, Zeger SL. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 73:13-22.
46. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G. 1998. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science. 280:1930-1934.
47. Maier A, Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold DA. 2003. Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Curr Biol. 13: 1076-1085.
48. Melloni L, Singer W. 2010. Distinct characteristics of conscious experience are met by large scale neuronal synchronization. In: Perry E, Collerton D, LeBeau FEN, Ashton H, editors. New horizons in the neuroscience of consciousness. Amsterdam (NL): John Benjamins. P. 17-28.
49. Morey RD. 2008. Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 4:61-64.
50. Muckli L, Kriegeskorte N, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE, Singer W, Goebel R. 2002. Apparent motion: event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of perceptual switches and states. J Neurosci. 22:RC219.
51. Müller TJ, Federspiel A, Horn H, Lovblad K, Lehmann C, Dierks T, Strik WK. 2005. The neurophysiological time pattern of illusionary visual perceptual transitions: a simultaneous EEG and fMRI study. Int J Psychophysiol. 55:299-312.
52. Mumford D. 1992. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol Cybern. 66: 241-251.
53. Nikolaev AR, Gepshtein S, Gong P, van Leeuwen C. 2010. Duration of coherence intervals in electrical brain activity in perceptual organization. Cereb Cortex. 20:365-382.
54. Noest AJ, van Ee R, Nijs MM, van Wezel RJ. 2007. Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. J Vis. 7:10.
55. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
56. Ollinger JM, Corbetta M, Shulman GL. 2001. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. II. Analysis. Neuro-image. 13:218-229.
57. Ollinger JM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. 2001. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. I. The method. Neu-roimage. 13:210-217.
58. Orbach J, Ehrlich D, Heath HA. 1963. Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation". Percept Mot Skills. 17:439-458.
59. Orban GA, Dupont P, Vogels R, Bormans G, Mortelmans L. 1997. Human brain activity related to orientation discrimination tasks. Eur J Neurosci. 9:246-259.
60. Pearson J, Brascamp J. 2008. Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn Sci. 12:334-341.
61. Peterhans E, Heider B, Baumann R. 2005. Neurons in monkey visual cortex detect lines defined by coherent motion of dots. Eur J Neurosci. 21:1091-1100.
62. Petit L, Courtney SM, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV. 1998. Sustained activity in the medial wall during working memory delays. J Neurosci. 18:9429-9437.
63. Purkinje JE. 1820. Beiträge zur näheren Kenntnis des Schwindels aus heautognostischen Daten. Med Jb Kaiser Königl Österr Staates Wien. 6:79-125.
64. Race EA, Shanker S, Wagner AD. 2008. Neural priming in human frontal cortex: multiple forms of learning reduce demands on the prefrontal executive system. J Cogn Neurosci. 21:1766-1781.
65. Raemaekers M, van der Schaaf ME, van Ee R, van Wezel RJ. 2009. Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in visual rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases. Brain Res. 1252:161-171.
66. Rao RP, Ballard DH. 1999. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci. 2:79-87.
67. Ratcliff R. 1978. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev. 85: 59-108.
68. Schwartz O, Hsu A, Dayan P. 2007. Space and time in visual context. Nat Rev Neurosci. 8:522-535.
69. Shikata E, Hamzei F, Glauche V, Knab R, Dettmers C, Weiller C, Büchel C. 2001. Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: an event-related fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 85:1309-1314.
70. Shipp S, Watson JD, Frackowiak RS, Zeki S. 1995. Retinotopic maps in human prestriate visual cortex: the demarcation of areas V2 and V3. Neuroimage. 2:125-132.
71. Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Menon V. 2008. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:12569-12574.
72. Sterzer P, Rees G. 2008. A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. J Cogn Neurosci. 20:389-399.
73. Sterzer P, Russ MO, Preibisch C, Kleinschmidt A. 2002. Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion. Neuroimage. 15:908-916.
74. Stocker AA, Simoncelli EP. 2006. Sensory adaptation within a Baye-sian framework for perception. In: Weiss Y, Schölkopf B, Platt J, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 18. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 1291-1298.
75. Summerfield C, Koechlin E. 2008. A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron. 59:336-347.
76. Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.
77. Sundareswara R, Schrater PR. 2008. Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. J Vis. 8:12 11-19.
78. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. 3-dimensional proportional systems: an approach to cerebral imaging. New York (NY): Thieme Medical Publishers.
79. Todd JJ, Marois R. 2004. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 428:751-754.
80. Todorovic A, van Ede F, Maris E, de Lange FP. 2011. Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J Neurosci. 31:9118-9123.
81. Volz KG, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY. 2003. Predicting events of varying probability: uncertainty investigated by fMRI. Neuro-image. 19:271-280.
82. von der Heydt R, Peterhans E, Baumgartner G. 1984. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science. 224:1260-1262.
83. Voss A, Rothermund K, Voss J. 2004. Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation. Mem Cognit. 32:1206-1220.
84. Wilson HR. 2007. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vision Res. 47:2741-2750.
85. Wohlschläger AM, Specht K, Lie C, Mohlberg H, Wohlschläger A, Bente K, Pietrzyk U, Stocker T, Zilles K, Amunts K et al. 2005. Linking retinotopic fMRI mapping and anatomical probability maps of human occipital areas V1 and V2. Neuroimage. 26:73-82.
86. Yarkoni T, Braver TS. 2010. Cognitive neuroscience approaches to individual differences in working memory and executive control: conceptual and methodological issues. In: Gruszka A, Matthews G, Szymura B, editors. Handbook of individual differences in cognition: attention, memory, and executive control. New York (NY): Springer. p. 87-107.
87. Yokoi I, Komatsu H. 2009. Relationship between neural responses and visual grouping in the monkey parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 29:13210-13221.
88. Yuille A, Kersten D. 2006. Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? Trends Cogn Sci. 10:301-308.