Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MARCH 2012, 2012, Pages 1-23

  Kornmeier, Jürgen ^a,b   Bach, Michael ^b  

^a Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambiguous figures; EEG ERP; Event related potentials; Multistable perception; Necker cube; Old young woman; Reversal negativity; Reversal positivity

Indexed keywords

ALPHA RHYTHM; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; GAMMA RHYTHM; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84859046007     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Ammons, C. H., and Ammons, R. B. (1963). Perspective reversal as affected by physical characteristics of Necker cube drawings. Proc. Montana Acad. Soc. 23, 287-302.
2. Andrews, T. J., Schluppeck, D., Homfray, D., Matthews, P., and Blakemore, C. (2002). Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. Neuroimage 17, 890-901.
3. Anllo-Vento, L., and Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 191-206.
4. Atmanspacher, H. (1992). Categoreal and acategoreal representation of knowledge. Cogn. Syst. 3, 259-288.
5. Atmanspacher, H., Bach, M., Filk, T., Kornmeier, J., and Römer, H. (2008). Cognitive time scales in a Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception. Open Cybern. Syst. J. 2, 234-251.
6. Atmanspacher, H., and Filk, T. (2010). A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception. J. Math. Psychol. 54, 314-321.
7. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., and Römer, H. (2004). Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biol. Cybern. 90, 33-40.
8. Bach, M. (1997). Some Visual Phenomena and Optical Illusions. Available at: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/
9. Bartels, A., and Logothetis, N. K. (2010). Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. J. Vis. 10, 3.
10. Basar-Eroglu, C., Struber, D., Kruse, P., Basar, E., and Stadler, M. (1996). Frontal gamma-band enhancement during multistable visual perception. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 24, 113-125.
11. Basar-Eroglu, C., Strüber, D., Stadler, M., and Kruse, E. (1993). Multistable visual perception induces a slow positive EEG wave. Int. J. Neurosci. 73, 139-151.
12. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167.
13. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain Mind 2, 5-38.
14. Blake, R., and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 13-21.
15. Boring, E. G. (1930). A new ambiguous figure. Am. J. Psychol. 42, 444-445.
16. Borsellino, A., De Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S., and Bartolini, B. (1972). Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139-144.
17. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Pestman, W. R., and van den Berg, A. V. (2005). Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. J. Vis. 5, 287-298.
18. Braun, J., and Mattia, M. (2010). Attractors and noise: twin drivers of decisions and multistability. Neuroimage 52, 740-751.
19. Britz, J., Landis, T., and Michel, C. M. (2009). Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 19, 55-65.
20. Britz, J., and Pitts, M. A. (2011). Perceptual reversals during binocular rivalry: ERP components and their concomitant source differences. Psychophysiology 48, 1490-1499.
21. Britz, J., Pitts, M. A., and Michel, C. M. (2010). Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 1432-1442.
22. Caffier, P. P., Erdmann, U., and Ullsperger, P. (2003). Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 89, 319-325.
23. Carmel, D., Walsh, V., Lavie, N., and Rees, G. (2010). Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 20, R799-R800.
24. Crick, F., and Koch, C. (1998). Consciousness and neuroscience. Cereb. Cortex 8, 97-107.
25. Debecker, J., and Desmedt, J. E. (1970). Maximum capacity for sequential one-bit auditory decisions. J. Exp. Psychol. 83, 366-372.
26. Dehaene, S., and Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 70, 200-227.
27. Dodd, J. V., Krug, K., Cumming, B. G., and Parker, A. J. (2001). Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. J. Neurosci. 21, 4809-4821.
28. Dubois, J., and Vanrullen, R. (2011). Visual trials: do the doors of perception open periodically? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001056. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001056
29. Ehm, W., Bach, M., and Kornmeier, J. (2008). What role for gamma oscillations in the perception of ambiguous figures? Perception 37, 116.
30. Ehm, W., Bach, M., and Kornmeier, J. (2011). Ambiguous figures and binding: EEG frequency modulations during multistable perception. Psychophysiology 48, 547-558.
31. Elbert, T., Hommel, J., and Lutzenberger, W. (1985). The perception of Necker cube reversal interacts with the Bereitschaftspotential. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 3, 5-12.
32. Feil, D., and Atmanspacher, H. (2010). Acategorial states in a representational theory of mental processes. J. Conscious. Stud. 17, 72-101.
33. Foxe, J. J., and Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Exp. Brain Res. 142, 139-150.
34. Fries, P., Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., Konig, P., and Singer, W. (1997). Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 12699-12704.
35. Gale, A. G., and Findlay, J. M. (1983). "Eye movement patterns in viewing ambiguous figures," in Eye Movements and Psychological Functions: International Views, eds R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fischer, and R. A. Monty (Hillsdale: Erlbaum), 145-168.
36. Girgus, J. J., Rock, I., and Egatz, R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Percept. Psychophys. 22, 550-556.
37. Gregory, R. (1974). "Choosing a paradigm for perception," in Handbook of Perception: Vol. 1. Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception, eds C. Carterette and M. Friedman (New York: Academic Press), 255-283.
38. Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction; Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. Berlin: Springer.
39. Hassberg, T. (2010). Aufmerksamkeits- und Adaptationseffekte bei instabiler Wahrnehmung. Medical Dissertation, University of Freiburg, 79. Available at: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/7875/
40. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., and Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438, 496-499.
41. Hein, C. (2006). Cognitive Influence on Perceptual Reversals - ERP Correlates to the Disambiguation of the Necker Cube. Diploma Thesis, 89.
42. Hesselmann, G., Kell, C. A., Eger, E., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2008). Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 10984-10989.
43. Hochberg, J., and Peterson, M. (1987). Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 116, 370-380.
44. Howard, I. P., and Durham, U. (1961). An investigation of a satiation process in the reversible perspective of revolving skeletal shapes. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 13, 19-33.
45. Ilg, R., Wohlschlager, A. M., Burazanis, S., Woller, A., Nunnemann, S., and Muhlau, M. (2008). Neural correlates of spontaneous percept switches in ambiguous stimuli: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 2325-2332.
46. Intaite, M., Koivisto, M., Ruksenas, O., and Revonsuo, A. (2010). Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: attention, awareness, or something else? Brain Cogn. 74, 24-34.
47. Isoglu-Alkaç, U., Basar-Eroglu, C., Ademoglu, A., Demiralp, T., Miener, M., and Stadler, M. (2000). Alpha activity decreases during the perception of Necker cube reversals: an application of wavelet transform. Biol. Cybern. 82, 313-320.
48. Isoglu-Alkaç, Ü., and Strüber, D. (2006). Necker cube reversals during long-term EEG recordings: sub-bands of alpha activity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 59, 179-189.
49. Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., and Rees, G. (2010). Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry. Curr. Biol. 20, 1626-1630.
50. Kanai, R., Carmel, D., Bahrami, B., and Rees, G. (2011). Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception. Curr. Biol. 21, R106-R107.
51. Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., and Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception 34, 803-822.
52. Klink, P. C., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., Brouwer, G. J., Noest, A. J., and van Wezel, R. J. (2008). Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. J. Vis. 8, 11-18.
53. Knoblich, G., and Öllinger, M. (2006). "Einsicht und Umstrukturierung beim Problemlösen. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie," in Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Denken und Problemlösen, ed. J. Funke (Göttingen: Hogrefe), C/II/8, 782.
54. Köhler, W. (1940). Dynamics in Psychology. New York: Liverlight.
55. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2003). "Zwei Varianten des Necker-Würfels: Frühe, okzipitale lateral-isierte ERP-Korrelate des Wahrnehmungswechsels," in Beiträge zur 6. Tübinger Wahrneh-mungskonferenz, 157.
56. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2004a). "More evidence for early visual processing in perceptual disambiguation of ambiguous figures," in Proceeding of the 7th Tübinger Perception Conference, Tübingen, 105.
57. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2004b). Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology 41, 1-8.
58. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2005). The Necker cube - an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Res. 45, 955-960.
59. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2006). Bistable perception - along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 62, 345-349.
60. Kornmeier, J., and Bach, M. (2009). Object perception: when our brain is impressed but we do not notice it. J. Vis. 9, 1-10.
61. Kornmeier, J., Bach, M., and Atmanspacher, H. (2004). Correlates of perspective instabilities in visually evoked potentials. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 14, 727-736.
62. Kornmeier, J., Ehm, W., Bigalke, H., and Bach, M. (2007). Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: how interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. Psychophysiology 44, 552-560.
63. Kornmeier, J., Hein, C. M., and Bach, M. (2009). Multistable perception: when bottom-up and top-down coincide. Brain Cogn. 69, 138-147.
64. Kornmeier, J., Heinrich, S. P., Atmanspacher, H., and Bach, M. (2001). The reversing "Necker Wall" - a new paradigm with reversal entrainment reveals an early EEG correlate. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42, 409.
65. Kornmeier, J., Heinrich, S. P., and Bach, M. (2002). "Necker-Würfel: Neuronale Sättigung und "top-down" Einflüsse," in Beiträge zur 5. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz, 69.
66. Kornmeier, J., Pfaffle, M., and Bach, M. (2011). Necker cube: stimulus-related (low-level) and percept-related (high-level) EEG signatures early in occipital cortex. J. Vis. 11, 1-11.
67. Kruse, P., Carmesin, H. O., Pahlke, L., Struber, D., and Stadler, M. (1996). Continuous phase transitions in the perception of multistable visual patterns. Biol. Cybern. 75, 321-330.
68. Lehky, S. R., and Maunsell, J. H. (1996). No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Res. 36, 1225-1234.
69. Lehmann, D., and Skrandies, W. (1980). Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48, 609-621.
70. Leopold, D. A., and Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 3, 254-264.
71. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 605-609.
72. Liebert, R. M., and Burk, B. (1985). Voluntary control of reversible figures. Percept. Mot. Skills 61, 1307-1310.
73. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1801-1818.
74. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., and Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, 150-157.
75. Long, G. M., and Olszweski, A. D. (1999). To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? Am. J. Psychol. 112, 41-71.
76. Long, G. M., and Toppino, T. C. (2004). Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. Psychol. Bull. 130, 748-768.
77. Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., and Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime time: fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Percept. Psychophys. 52, 609-616.
78. Luck, S. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
79. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., and Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280, 1930-1934.
80. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Aura, C., Zhu, C., Ye, F. Q., and Leopold, D. A. (2008). Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1193-1200.
81. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., and Leopold, D. A. (2003). Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Curr. Biol. 13, 1076-1085.
82. Mathes, B., Struber, D., Stadler, M. A., and Basar-Eroglu, C. (2006). Voluntary control of Necker cube reversals modulates the EEG delta- and gamma-band response. Neurosci. Lett. 402, 145-149.
83. Meenan, J. P., and Miller, L. A. (1994). Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 32, 1145-1149.
84. Michel, C. M., Murray, M. M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L., and Grave de Peralta, R. (2004). EEG source imaging. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 2195-2222.
85. Moreno-Bote, R., Rinzel, J., and Rubin, N. (2007). Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1125-1139.
86. Müller, T. J., Koenig, T., Wackermann, J., Kalus, P., Fallgatter, A., Strik, W., and Lehmann, D. (2005). Subsecond changes of global brain state in illusory multistable motion perception. J. Neural Transm. 112, 565-576.
87. Murata, T., Matsui, N., Miyauchi, S., Kakita, Y., and Yanagida, T. (2003). Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry. Neuroreport 14, 1347-1352.
88. Nakatani, H., and van Leeuwen, C. (2006). Transient synchrony of distant brain areas and perceptual switching in ambiguous figures. Biol. Cybern. 94, 445-457.
89. Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phaenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phaenomenon which occurs on viewing a Figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1, 329-337.
90. Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., and van Wezel, R. J. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. J. Vis. 7, 10.
91. O'Donnell, B. F., Hendler, T., and Squires, N. K. (1988). Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the Necker cube. Psychophysiology 25, 137-143.
92. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., and Heath, H. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation". Percept. Mot. Skills 17, 439-458.
93. Orbach, J., Zucker, E., and Olson, R. (1966). Reversibility of the Necker cube: VII: reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figure-off durations. Percept. Mot. Skills 22, 615-618.
94. Palva, S., and Palva, J. M. (2007). New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. Trends Neurosci. 30, 150-158.
95. Pastukhov, A., and Braun, J. (2008). A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. J. Vis. 8, 1-14.
96. Pearson, J., and Brascamp, J. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 12, 334-341.
97. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9, 456-479.
98. Pitts, M. A., Gavin, W. J., and Nerger, J. L. (2008). Early top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials. Brain Cogn. 67, 11-24.
99. Pitts, M. A., Martinez, A., and Hillyard, S. A. (2010). When and where is binocular rivalry resolved in the visual cortex? J. Vis. 10, 1-11.
100. Pitts, M. A., Martinez, A., Stalmaster, C., Nerger, J. L., and Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals. Psychophysiology 46, 694-702.
101. Pitts, M. A., Nerger, J. L., and Davis, T. J. R. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. J. Vis. 7, 1-14.
102. Pomerantz, J., and Kubovy, M. (1981). "Perceptual organization: an overview," in Perceptual Organization, eds M. Kubovy and J. Pomerantz (Hillsdale: Erlbaum), 423-456.
103. Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychol. Bull. 89, 506-540.
104. Rock, I., Gopnik, A., and Hall, S. (1994a). Do young children reverse ambiguous figures? Perception 23, 635-644.
105. Rock, I., Hall, S., and Davis, J. (1994b). Why do ambiguous figures reverse? Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 87, 33-59.
106. Roeber, U., Widmann, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Herrmann, C. S., O'Shea, R. P., and Schröger, E. (2008). Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: time and place from event-related brain potentials. J. Vis. 8, 1-12.
107. Schiller, P. V. (1933). Stroboskopische Alternativversuche. Psychol. Forsch. 17, 179-214.
108. Sterzer, P., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2007). A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 323-328.
109. Sterzer, P., Kleinschmidt, A., and Rees, G. (2009). The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 13, 310-318.
110. Sterzer, P., and Rees, G. (2008). A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 389-399.
111. Strüber, D., Basar-Eroglu, C., Hoff, E., and Stadler, M. (2000). Reversal-rate dependent differences in the EEG gamma-band during multistable visual perception. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 38, 243-252.
112. Strüber, D., Basar-Eroglu, C., Miener, M., and Stadler, M. (2001). EEG gamma-band response during the perception of Necker cube reversals. Vis. Cogn. 8, 609-621.
113. Strüber, D., and Herrmann, C. S. (2002). MEG alpha activity decrease reflects destabilization of multistable percepts. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 370-382.
114. Strüber, D., and Stadler, M. (1999). Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures. Perception 28, 1185-1196.
115. Tong, F., and Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195-199.
116. Tong, F., Meng, M., and Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 10, 502-511.
117. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., and Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21, 753-759.
118. Tononi, G., Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., and Edelman, G. M. (1998). Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 3198-3203.
119. Toppino, T. C., and Long, G. M. (1987). Selective adaptation with reversible figures: don't change that channel. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 37-48.
120. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C., and Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Res. 45, 41-55.
121. VanRullen, R., Reddy, L., and Koch, C. (2006). The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at approximately 13 Hz. J. Neurosci. 26, 502-507.
122. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., and Wascher, E. (2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J. Psychophysiol. 19, 165-181.
123. Vickers, D. (1972). A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation. Perception 1, 31-48.
124. Washburn, M. F., Mallat, H., and Naylor, A. (1931). The influence of the size of an outline cube on the fluctuations of its perspective. Am. J. Psychol. 43, 484-489.
125. Watanabe, M., Cheng, K., Murayama, Y., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Tanaka, K., and Logothetis, N. (2011). Attention but not awareness modulates the BOLD signal in the human V1 during binocular suppression. Science 334, 829-831.
126. Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegungen. Z. Psychol. 61, 161-265.
127. Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., and Leopold, D. A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 17507-17512.
128. Woerner, R., Bach, M., and Kornmeier, J. (2009). Ambiguous figures: different levels of perceptual adaptation. Perception 38, 138.
129. Woo, M., Neider, J., and Davis, T. (1998). OpenGL Programming Guide. The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, Version 1.1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
130. Zaretskaya, N., Thielscher, A., Logothetis, N. K., and Bartels, A. (2010). Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 20, 2106-2111.