The impact of stimulus complexity and frequency swapping on stabilization of binocular rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Sandberg, Kristian ^a   Bahrami, Bahador ^b,c   Lindeløv, Jonas Kristoffer ^a   Overgaard, Morten ^a,d   Rees, Geraint ^b,c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Memory; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956314219     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.2.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andrews, T. J., Schluppeck, D., Homfray, D., Matthews, P., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. Neuroimage, 17, 890-901.
2. Asher, H. (1953). Suppression theory of binocular vision. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 37, 37-49.
3. Brascamp, J. W., Pearson, J., Blake, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2009). Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: Implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. Journal of Vision, 9(3):3, 1-23, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/3/3, doi:10.1167/9.3.3.
4. Brascamp, J. W., Knapen, T. H. J., Kanai, R., Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., van den Berg, A. V., et al. (2008). Multitimescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 3, e1497.
5. Breese, B. B. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 3, 1-65.
6. Brown, R. J., & Norcia, A. M. (1997). A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Research, 37, 2401-2408.
7. Carter, O., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE, 2, e343.
8. Chen, X., & He, S. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 1013-1017.
9. du Tour, E. F. (1760). Discussion d'une question d'optique. Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique Présentés par Divers Savants (l'Académie des Sciences), 3, 514-530.
10. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 283-289.
11. Haynes, J., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eyespecific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
12. Haynes, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Current Biology: CB, 15, 1301-1307.
13. Kamphuisen, A., Bauer, M., & van Ee, R. (2008). No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(5):4, 1-8, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/4, doi:10.1167/8.5.4.
14. Knapen, T., Brascamp, J., Adams, W. J., & Graf, E. W. (2009). The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. Journal of Vision, 9(13):16, 1-12, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/13/16, doi:10.1167/9.13.16.
15. Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Fehér, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 15508-15511.
16. Lansing, R. W. (1964). Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science, 146, 1325-1327.
17. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
18. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
19. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930-1934.
20. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2003). Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Current Biology: CB, 13, 1076-1085.
21. Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philosophical Magazine Journal Science, 1, 329-337.
22. Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., & van Wezel, R. J. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision, 7(8):10, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/8/10, doi:10.1167/7.8.10.
23. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., & Heath, H. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation". Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 439-458.
24. Pastor, M. A., Artieda, J., Arbizu, J., Valencia, M., & Masdeu, J. C. (2003). Human cerebral activation during steady-state visual-evoked responses. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 23, 11621-11627.
25. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. (2004). Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. Journal of Vision, 4(3):6, 196-202, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/3/6, doi:10.1167/4.3.6.
26. Rogers, R. L., Rogers, S. W., & Tootle, J. S. (1977). Stimulus complexity and rate of alternation in binocular rivalry. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 669-670.
27. Rubin, E. (1915). Synsoplevede figurer. Studier i psykologisk Analyse. Første del. København, Denmark: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.
28. Silver, M. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2007). Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 532-543.
29. Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., Edelman, G.M., & Tononi, G. (1999). Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19, 5435-5448.
30. Sterzer, P., & Rees, G. (2008). A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 389-399.
31. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
32. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
33. van Boxtel, J. J. A., Alais, D., & van Ee, R. (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8(5):17, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/17, doi:10.1167/ 8.5.17.
34. Wilkinson, F., James, T. W., Wilson, H. R., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Current Biology: CB, 10, 1455-1458.
35. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.