The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 28, 2011, Pages 10293-10301

  Knapen, Tomas ^a   Brascamp, Jan ^b   Pearson, Joel ^c   van Ee, Raymond ^d,e,f   Blake, Randolph ^b,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^f Seoul National University ^*  (South Korea)

^g Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPARENT MOTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA RIVALRY; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION;

EID: 79960437330     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1727-11.2011     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alais D, Cass J, O'Shea RP, Blake R (2010) Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Curr Biol 20:1362-1367.
2. Anstis S, Giaschi D, Cogan AI (1985) Adaptation to apparent motion. Vis Res 25:1051-1062.
3. Asplund CL, Todd JJ, Snyder AP, Marois R (2010) A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention. Nat Neurosci 13:507-512.
4. Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2003) General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in fmri. Neuroimage 20:1052-1063.
5. Binder JR, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Medler DA, Ward BD (2004) Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci 7:295-301.
6. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:13-21.
7. Blake R, Sobel KV, Gilroy LA (2003) Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron 39:869-878.
8. Brascamp JW, van Ee R, Noest AJ, Jacobs RH, van den Berg AV (2006) The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. J Vis 6:1244-1256.
9. Brass M, von Cramon DY (2004) Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 16:609-620.
10. Carmel D, Walsh V, Lavie N, Rees G (2010) Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 20:R799-R800.
11. Chong SC, Tadin D, Blake R (2005) Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. J Vis 5:1004-1012.
12. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulusdriven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:201-215.
13. Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58:306-324.
14. Crick F, Koch C (1995) Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375:121-123.
15. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179-194.
16. de Graaf TA, de Jong MC, Goebel R, van Ee R, Sack AT (2011) On the functional relevance of frontal cortex for passive and voluntarily controlled bistable vision cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. Advance online publication. Retrieved March 15, 2011. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr015.
17. Dosenbach NU, Visscher KM, Palmer ED, Miezin FM, Wenger KK, Kang HC, Burgund ED, Grimes AL, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2006) A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 50:799-812.
18. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2002) A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J Neurophysiol 87:615-620.
19. Driver J, Vuilleumier P (2001) Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 79:39-88.
20. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195-207.
21. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Ségonne F, Salat DH, Busa E, Seidman LJ, Goldstein J, Kennedy D, Caviness V, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:11-22.
22. Haynes JD, Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:523-534.
23. Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG (2004) A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Nature 431:859-862.
24. Helmholtz H (1910) Treatise on physiological optics volume 1. New York: Dover.
25. Hering E (1964) Outlines of a theory of the light sense. p 344. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
26. Hol K, Koene A, van Ee R (2003) Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. J Vis 3:486-498.
27. Hollins M, Hudnell K (1980) Adaptation of the binocular rivalry mechanism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19:1117-1120.
28. Kanai R, Bahrami B, Rees G (2010) Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry. Current biology 20:1626-1630.
29. Kanai R, Carmel D, Bahrami B, Rees G (2011) Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception. Curr Biol 21:R106-R107.
30. Kelley TA, Serences JT, Giesbrecht B, Yantis S (2008) Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. Cereb Cortex 18:114-125.
31. Kleinschmidt A, Büchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc Biol Sci 265:2427-2433.
32. Klink PC, Brascamp JW, Blake R, van Wezel RJ (2010) Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision. Curr Biol 20:1464-1469.
33. Konishi S, Donaldson DI, Buckner RL (2001) Transient activation during block transition. Neuroimage 13:364-374.
34. Lankheet MJ (2006) Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. J Vis 6:304-310.
35. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ (2007) Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 10:1048-1054.
36. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3:254-264.
37. Lumer ED, Rees G (1999) Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1669-1673.
38. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280:1930-1934.
39. Meenan JP, Miller LA (1994) Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 32:1145-1149.
40. Meng M, Tong F (2004) Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J Vis 4:539-551.
41. Paffen CL, Alais D, Verstraten FA (2006) Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychol Sci 17:752-756.
42. Pastukhov A, Braun J (2007) Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. J Vis 7:5.1-5.17.
43. Polonsky A, Blake R, Braun J, Heeger DJ (2000) Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 3:1153-1159.
44. Raemaekers M, van der Schaaf ME, van Ee R, van Wezel RJ (2009) Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in visual rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases. Brain Res 1252:161-171.
45. Rees G (2007) Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:877-886.
46. Ricci C, Blundo C (1990) Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 28:1163-1173.
47. Schurger A (2009) A very inexpensive MRI-compatible method for dichoptic visual stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 177:199-202.
48. Silver MA, Ress D, Heeger DJ (2005) Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 94:1358-1371.
49. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structuralMRimage analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23[Suppl 1]:S208-S219.
50. Sterzer P, Kleinschmidt A (2007) A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:323-328.
51. Sterzer P, Kleinschmidt A, Rees G (2009) The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends Cogn Sci 13:310-318.
52. Stevens MC, Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA (2005) Hemispheric differences in hemodynamics elicited by auditory oddball stimuli. Neuroimage 26:782-792.
53. Szczepanski SM, Konen CS, Kastner S (2010) Mechanisms of spatial attention control in frontal and parietal cortex. J Neurosci 30:148-160.
54. Tong F, Engel SA (2001) Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411:195-199.
55. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21:753-759.
56. Valle-Inclán F, Gallego E (2006) Chapter 13 bilateral frontal leucotomy does not alter perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry. Prog Brain Res 155:235-239.
57. van Dam LC, van Ee R (2005) The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vis Res 45:2417-2435.
58. van Ee R (2009) Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 26:2612-2622.
59. van Ee R, van Dam LC, Brouwer GJ (2005) Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Res 45:41-55.
60. Wilcke JC, O'Shea RP, Watts R (2009) Frontoparietal activity and its structural connectivity in binocular rivalry. Brain Res 1305:96-107.
61. Wilson HR, Blake R, Lee SH (2001) Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412:907-910.
62. Windmann S, Wehrmann M, Calabrese P, Güntürkün O (2006) Role of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control over bistable vision. J Cogn Neurosci 18:456-471.
63. Woolrich MW, Behrens TE, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2004) Multilevel linear modelling for fMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 21:1732-1747.
64. Yang Y, Rose D, Blake R (1992) On the variety of percepts associated with dichoptic viewing of dissimilar monocular stimuli. Perception 21:47-62.
65. Yantis S, Nakama T (1998) Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nat Neurosci 1:508-512.
66. Yantis S, Schwarzbach J, Serences JT, Carlson RL, Steinmetz MA, Pekar JJ, Courtney SM (2002) Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci 5:995-1002.
67. Zaretskaya N, Thielscher A, Logothetis NK, Bartels A (2010) Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 20:2106-2111.