Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-14

  Pitts, Michael A ^a   Nerger, Janice L ^b   Davis, Trevor J R ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b CO 80523jessicawitt colostateedunatetenhundfeld colostateeduzachking colostateeduhttp: amplabcolostateedu   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguous figures; Bistable perception; Event related potentials; Multistable perception; N1; P1; Reversal negativity; Selection negativity; Selective attention; Spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RETINA IMAGE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846534688     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.1.6     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 191-206. [PubMed]
2. Anllo-Vento, L., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1998). Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 216-238. [PubMed]
3. Basar-Eroglu, C., Struber, D., Stadler, M., Kruse, P., & Basar, E. (1993). Multistable visual perception induces a slow positive EEG wave. International Journal of Neuroscience, 73, 139-151. [PubMed]
4. Clark, V., & Hillyard, S. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387-402.
5. Cohen, L. (1959). Rate of apparent change of a Necker cube as a function of prior stimulation. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 327-344.
6. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111. [PubMed]
7. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150. [PubMed]
8. Georgiades, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Biasing effects in ambiguous figures: Removal or fixation of critical features can affect perception. Visual Cognition, 4, 383-408.
9. Gomez Gonzalez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7, 41-51. [PubMed]
10. Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 781-787. [PubMed] [Article]
11. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1257-1270. [PubMed] [Article]
12. Hopf, J. M., Vogel, E., Woodman, G., Heinze, H. J., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2088-2095. [PubMed] [Article]
13. Horlitz, K. L., & O'Leary, A. (1993). Satiation or availability? Effects of attention, memory, and imagery on the perception of ambiguous figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 668-681. [PubMed]
14. Inui, T., Tanaka, S., Okada, T., Nishizawa, S., Katayama, M., & Konishi, J. (2000). Neural substrates for depth perception of the Necker cube; a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 282, 145-148. [PubMed]
15. Isoglu-Alkac, U., Basar-Eroglu, C., Ademoglu, A., Demiralp, T., Miener, M., & Stadler, M. (1998). Analysis of the electroencephalographic activity during the Necker cube reversals by means of the wavelet transform. Biological Cybernetics, 79, 437-442. [PubMed]
16. Johannes, S., Munte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., & Mangun, G. R. (1995). Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 2, 189-205. [PubMed]
17. Kawabata, N. (1986). Attention and depth perception. Perception, 15, 563-572. [PubMed]
18. Kleinschmidt, A., Buchel, C., Zeki, S., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1998). Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 2427-2433. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Kohler, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liverlight.
20. Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2004). Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: Evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology, 41, 1-8. [PubMed]
21. Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2005). The Necker cube - an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Research, 45, 955-960. [PubMed]
22. Lemmo, G. (2006). Photograph appeared in National Geographic World Magazine, October 1997; Photograph taken in Masai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya, 1993. [Link]
23. Leopold, D. A. (2003). Visual perception: Shaping what we see. Current Biology, 13, R10-R12. [PubMed] [Article]
24. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553. [PubMed]
25. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264. [PubMed]
26. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perceptions of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609. [PubMed]
27. Liebert, R. M., & Burk, B. (1985). Voluntary control of reversible figures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1307-1310. [PubMed]
28. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763. [PubMed]
29. Long, G. M., & Toppino, T. C. (2004). Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 748-768. [PubMed]
30. Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609-616. [PubMed]
31. Luck, S. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 887-904. [PubMed]
33. Luu, P., & Ferree, T. (2005). Determination of the Geodesic Sensor Nets' average electrode positions and their 10-10 international equivalents. Electrical Geodesics, Inc., Technical Note. [Article]
34. Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18. [PubMed]
35. Martinez, A., DiRusso, F., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Buxton, R. B., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Putting spatial attention on the map: Timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Vision Research, 41, 1437-1457. [PubMed]
36. Martin-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., & Rubia, F. J. (1999). Insights from event-related potentials into the temporal and hierarchical organization of the ventral and dorsal streams of the visual system in selective attention. Psychophysiology, 36, 721-736. [PubMed]
37. Meenan, J. P., & Miller, L. A. (1994). Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1145-1149. [PubMed]
38. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7), 539-551, http://journalofvision.org/4/7/2/, doi:10.1167/4.7.2. [PubMed] [Article]
39. Michie, P. T., Karayanidis, F., Smith, G. L., Barrett, N. A., Large, M. M., O'Sullivan, B. T., et al. (1999). An exploration of varieties of visual attention: ERP findings. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 419-450. [PubMed]
40. O'Donnell, B. F., Hendler, T., & Squires, N. K. (1988). Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the Necker cube. Psychophysiology, 25, 137-143. [PubMed]
41. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., & Heath, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation". Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 439-458. [PubMed]
42. Pelton, L. H., & Solley, C. M. (1968). Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 585-588. [PubMed]
43. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479. [PubMed]
44. Pitts, M. (in press). Top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials. Dissertation, Colorado State University.
45. Ricci, C., & Blundo, C. (1990). Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1163-1173. [PubMed]
46. Rock, I., Hall, S., & Davis, J. (1994). Why do ambiguous figures reverse? Acta Psychologica, 87, 33-59. [PubMed]
47. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413. [PubMed] [Article]
48. Shulman, G. (1993). Attentional effects on Necker cube adaptation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 540-547.
49. Slotnick, S. D., & Yantis, S. (2005). Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 97-108. [PubMed]
50. Smid, H. G., Jakob, A., & Heinze, H. J. (1997). The organization of multidimensional selection on the basis of color and shape: An event-related brain potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 693-713. [PubMed]
51. Smid, H. G., Jakob, A., & Heinze, H. J. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of visual selective attention to conjunctions of color and shape. Psychophysiology, 36, 264-279. [PubMed]
52. Struber, D., & Stadler, M. (1999). Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures. Perception, 28, 1185-1196. [PubMed]
53. Toppino, T. C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1285-1295. [PubMed]
54. Toppino, T. C., & Long, G. M. (1987). Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don't change that channel. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 37-48. [PubMed]
55. Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137-151. [PubMed]
56. van Ee, R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 29-40. [PubMed]
57. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bistability. Vision Research, 45, 41-55. [PubMed]
58. Windmann, S., Wehrmann, M., Calabrese, P., & Gunturkun, O. (2006). Role of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control over bistable vision. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 456-471. [PubMed]
59. Woldorff, M., Fox, P., Matzke, M., Lancaster, J., Veeraswamy, S., Zamarripa, F., et al. (1997). Retinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 280-286.