Long-Term Effects of First-Grade Multitier Intervention

Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 250-267

  Al Otaiba, Stephanie ^a   Kim, Young Suk ^b   Wanzek, Jeanne ^b   Petscher, Yaacov ^b   Wagner, Richard K ^b  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

learning disabilities; longitudinal; reading; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903553196     PISSN: 19345747     EISSN: 19345739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2014.906692     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. Elementary School Journal, 111, 535-560. NIHMS ID 249051.
2. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (in press). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Manuscript accepted for publication in Exceptional Children.
3. Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Schatschneider, C., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Predicting first grade reading performance from kindergarten response to instruction. Exceptional Children, 77, 453-470.
4. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316.
5. Beach, K.D., & O'Connor, R.E. (2013). Early response-to-intervention measures and criteria as predictors of reading disability in the beginning of third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219413495451
6. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate-A new and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289-300.
7. Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., Treadway, G.H. (2002). Open court reading. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
8. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & R. Hallahan, R. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., & Frances, D.J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447-466. doi:10.1177/00222194060390050601
10. Denton, C.A., Tolar, T.D., Fletcher, J.M., Barth, A.E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D.J. (2013). Effects of Tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 633-648. doi:10.1037/a0032581
11. Fletcher, J.M., Coulter, W.A., Reschly, D.J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 304-331.
12. Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Barth, A.E., Denton, C.A., Cirino, P.T., Francis, D.J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Cognitive correlates of inadequate response to reading intervention. School Psychology Review, 40, 3-22.
13. Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading disabilities in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.90.1.37
14. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21.
15. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W.D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3
16. Gilbert, J.K, Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Bouton, B., Barquero, L.A., & Cho, E. (2013). Efficacy of a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 135-154. doi:10.1002/rrq.45
17. Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2001). Dynamic indicators of basic literacy skills. (6th ed.). Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
18. Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Graves, A. (2003). The English-language learner classroom observation instrument: Observations of beginning reading instruction in urban schools. In S. Vaughn & K.L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 111-144). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
19. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G.A. (2006) Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636-644.
20. Hill, D.R., King, S.A., Lemons, C.J., & Partanen, J.N. (2012). Fidelity of implementation and instructional alignment in Response to Intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 116-124. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00357.x
21. Lam, E.A., & McMaster, K. (in press). Predictors of responsiveness to early literacy intervention: A ten year update. Manuscript accepted for publication.
22. Little, R.J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198-1202.
23. Lonigan, C.J., & Whitehurst, G.J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 265-292. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80038-6
24. Lyon, G.R., & Chhabra, V. (1996), The current state of science and the future of specific reading disability. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 2-9. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1996)2:1<2::AID-MRDD2>3.0.CO;2-X
25. Mathes, P.G., Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182. doi:10.1598/RRQ. 40.2.2
26. Mathes, P.G., Torgesen, J.K., Wahl, M., Menchetti, J.C., & Grek, M.L. (1999). Proactive beginning reading: Intensive small group instruction for struggling readers. (#R01 HD). Prevention and Remediation of Reading Disabilities, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
27. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Available from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm
28. Nelson, J., Benner, G.J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 255. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00080
29. O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 43-54. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62443452?accountid=4840
30. O'Connor, R.E., Harty, K.R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. [RtI]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532-538. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060901
31. Shinn, M.M., & Shinn, M.R. (2004). AIMSweb. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
32. Simmons, D.C., Kameenui, E.J., Stoolmiller, M., Coyne, M.D., & Harn, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science up to scale (pp. 197-228). Timonium, MD: York Press.
33. Speece, D.L., Schatschneider, C., Silverman, R., Case, L.P., Cooper, D.H., & Jacobs, D.M. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework. The Elementary School Journal, 11, 585-607. doi:10.1086/659032
34. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
35. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency, 2nd edition. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
36. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
37. Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Swanson, L.H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 283-295. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/870288217?accountid=4840
38. Vaughn, S., Denton, C.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 432-444.
39. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Murray, C.S. (2007). Monitoring response to supplemental services for students at risk for reading difficulties: High and low responders. In S.R. Jimerson, M.K. Burns, & A.M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 234-243). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3_17
40. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C.S., Scammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A.L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention: Examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75, 165-183.
41. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M.B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
42. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S.G., & Fanuele, D.P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157-169. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020401
43. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437-480. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
44. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541-561.
45. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126-142.
46. Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third edition. San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
47. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson-III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.