The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 148-182

  Mathes, Patricia G ^a   Denton, Carolyn A ^b,f   Fletcher, Jack M ^c,f   Anthony, Jason L ^d   Francis, David J ^d   Schatschneider, Christopher ^e  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^e FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UCT 2478 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844389711     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. ALLINGTON, R.L. (1983). The reading instruction provided readers of differing reading abilities. Elementary School Journal, 83, 548-559.
2. BECKER, W.C. (1973). Applications of behavior principles in typical classrooms. In C.A. Thorensen (Ed.), Behavior modification in education (72nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 1, pp. 77-106). Chicago: National Society of the Study of Education.
3. BROPHY, J., & GOOD, T. (1986). Teacher-effects results. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York; Macmillan.
4. BROWN, J.S., COLLINS, A., & DUGUID, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
5. CARNINE, D.W., SILBERT, J., KAME'ENUI, E.J., & TARVER, S.G. (2004). Direct instruction reading(4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
6. CLAY, M.M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155-173.
7. CLAY, M.M. (1993). Reading Recovery; A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. CLAY, M.M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. DENTON, C.A., & FLETCHER, J.M. (2003). Scaling reading interventions. In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 445-463). Timonium, MD: York Press.
10. DENTON, C.A., & HOCKER, J. (2004). Responsive reading instruction: Teacher handbook Unpublished manuscript.
11. DENTON, CA., & MATHES, P.G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 229-251). Timonium, MD: York Press.
12. ELBAUM, B., VAUGHN, S., HUGHES, M.T., & MOODY, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
13. ELKONIN, D.B. (1973). USSR. In JA Downing (Ed.), Comparative reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing (2nd ed., pp. 551-579). New York: Macmillan.
14. ENGELMANN, S. (1997). Preventing failure in the primary grades. Eugene, OR: Association for Direct Instruction.
15. ENGELMANN, S., & CARNINE, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
16. FOORMAN, B.R., FRANCIS, D.J., FLETCHER, J.M., SCHATSCHNEIDER, C., & MEHTA, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading disabilities in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
17. FOORMAN, B.R., & TORGESEN, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 203-212.
18. FOUNTAS, I.C., & PINNELL, G.S. (1996). Guided reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. FOUNTAS, I.C., & PINNELL, G.S. (1999). Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. FRANCIS, D.J., SHAYWITZ, S.E., STUBBING, K.K., SHAYWITZ, B.A., & FLETCHER, J.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
21. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., HAMLETT, C.L., & STECKER, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
22. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., HOSP, M.K., & JENKINS, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 239-256.
23. GOMEZ-BELLENGE, F.X., ROGERS, E., & FULLERTON, S.K. (2003). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura national report 2001-2002. Columbus: Ohio State University, Reading Recovery National Data Evaluation Center.
24. GOOD, R.H., WALLIN, J., SIMMONS, D.C., KAME'ENUI, E.J., & KAMINSKI, R.A. (2002). System-wide percentile ranks for DIBELS Benchmark Assessment (Tech. Rep. 9). Eugene: University of Oregon.
25. HARRIS, K.R., & PRESSLEY, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-404.
26. JUEL, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
27. KAME'ENUI, E.J., & SIMMONS, D.C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: Prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28. KAVALE, K.A., & REESE, J.H. (1992). The character of learning disabilities: An Iowa profile. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 74-94.
29. LYON, R.G. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 2-37.
30. MATHES, P.G., & DENTON, C.A. (2002). The prevention and identification of reading disability. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 9, 185-191.
31. MATHES, P.G., & FUCHS, L.S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23, 55-76.
32. MATHES, P.G., HOWARD, J.K, ALLEN, S., & FUCHS, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Making early reading instruction more responsive to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62-94. doi:10.1598/RRQ.33.1.4
33. MATHES, P.G., & TORGESEN, J.K. (1998). All children can learn to read: Critical care for students with special needs. Peabody Journal of Education, 73, 317-340.
34. MATHES, P.G., TORGESEN, J.K., & ALLOR, J.H. (2001). The effects of peer assisted learning strategies for first-grade learners with and without additional computer assisted instruction in phonological aware ness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371-410.
35. MATHES. P.G., TORGESSEN, J.K., & HERON, J. (2004). Teachers computerized assessement for reading excellence [Computer software]. San Rafael, CA: Talking-Fingers.
36. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. O'CONNOR, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 43-54.
38. O'MALLEY, K.J., FRANCIS, D.J., FOORMAN, B.R., FLETCHER, J.M., & SWANK, P.R. (2002). Growth in precursor reading skills: Do low-achieving and IQ-discrepant readers develop differently? Learning Disability Research and Practice, 17, 19-34.
39. PETERSON, B. (1991). Selecting books for beginning readers. In D.E. DeFord, CA Lyons, & G.S. Pinnell (Eds.), Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery (pp. 119-147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
40. PRESSLEY, M.P. (1998). Elementary reading instruction that works. New York: Guilford.
41. PRESSLEY, M.P., & MCCORMICK, C.M. (1995). Cognition, teaching, and assessment. New York: HarperCollins,
42. RAYNER, K., FOORMAN, B.R., PERFETTI, C.A., PESETSKY, D., & SEIDENBERG, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
43. ROGOFF, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York Oxford University Press.
44. ROJEWSKI, J.W., & SCHELL, J.W. (1994). Cognitive apprenticeship for learners with special needs. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 234-243.
45. ROSENSHINE, B., & STEVENS, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.
46. SCHATSCHNEIDER, C., FRANCIS, D.J., FOORMAN, B.R., FLETCHER, J.M., & MEHTA, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439-449.
47. SHANAHAN, T. (1998). On the effectiveness and limitations of tutoring in reading. Review of Research in Education, 23, 217-234.
48. SIMMONS, D.C., KAME'ENUI, E.J., STOOLMILLER, M., COYNE, M.D., & HARN, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at-risk for reading difficulties. In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 197-228). Baltimore: York Press.
49. SKINNER, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
50. SNOW, C.E., BURNS, M.S., & GRIFFIN, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. STANOVICH, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-397. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
52. STORCH, S.A., & WHITEHURST, G.J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934-947.
53. TORGESEN, J.K. (2000). Individual responses in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55-64.
54. TORGESEN, J.K., & BURGESS, S.R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 161-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. TORGESEN, J.K., RASHOTTE, C., ALEXANDER, A., ALEXANDER, J., & MACPHEE, K. (2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children, In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275-298). Baltimore: York Press.
56. TORGESEN, J.K., WAGNER, R.K., RASHOTTE, C.A., ROSE, E., LINDAMOOD, P., CONWAY, T., ET AL. (1999). Preventing reading failure in your children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
57. VAUGHN, S., & LINAN-THOMPSON, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading disabilities. In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 299-324). Baltimore: York Press.
58. VELLUTINO, F.R., SCANLON, D.M., & JACCARD, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up to difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B.R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore: York Press.
59. VELLUTINO, F.R., SCANLON, D.M., SIPAY, E.R., SMALL, S.G., PRATT, A., CHEN, R., ET AL. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
60. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. WAGNER, R.K. (1988). Causal relations between the development of phonological processing abilities and the acquisition of reading skills: A meta-anafysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 261-279.