Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency

Exceptional Children

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 7-21

  Fuchs, Lynn S ^a,b   Fuchs, Douglas ^a   Compton, Donald L ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244390518     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290407100101     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Biemiller, A. (1977-1978). Relationship between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223-253.
2. Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of meta-cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
3. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Pychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
4. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
5. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
6. Fry, E. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 513-516.
7. Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2004). Identifying students with learning disabilities using a response-to-instruction approach in first grade. Manuscript in preparation.
8. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1992). Limitations of a feel-good approach to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3(2), 93-97.
9. Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172-186.
10. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-501.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429-438.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 43-52.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989c). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103-111.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-29.
18. Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
19. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1981). The asymptotic distribution of commonality components. Psychometrika, 46, 331-336.
20. Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula? Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351-375.
21. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., & Lutz, G. (1994). The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 188-202.
22. Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69-75.
23. Jensen, A. R. (1981). Straight talk about mental tests. New York: Free Press.
24. Marston, D., Fuchs, L S., & Deno, S. L. (1986). Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardized achievement tests and curriculum-related measures. Diagnostique, 11, 77-90.
25. McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
26. McMaster, K. N., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L S. & Compton, D. L. (in press) Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children.
27. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education fir children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Schatschneider, C., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265-282.
29. Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. (1969). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York John Wiley.
30. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. (2003, December). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Response-To-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
31. Walker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York: Holt & Co.
32. Wesson, C. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 246-257.
33. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (Rev. ed.). Gide Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.