Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 585-607

  Speece, Deborah L ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^b   Silverman, Rebecca ^a   Case, Lisa Pericola ^a   Cooper, David H ^c   Jacobs, Dawn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ELON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955946123     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/659032     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Benes, K. M. (1995). Review of Social Skills Rating System. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 965-967). Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
2. Berkeley, S., Bender, W., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85-95.
3. Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of preschool phonemic identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659-667.
4. Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Study of Reading, 3, 331-361.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Compton, D. L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 219-259.
8. Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225-239.
9. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394-409.
10. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
11. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
12. DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Early Literacy Skills. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.dibels.uoregon.edu/measures
13. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 207-225.
14. DuPaul, G. J., Volpe, R. J., Jitendra, A. K., Lutz, J. G., Lorah, K. S., & Gruber, R. (2004). Elementary school students with AD/HD: Predictors of academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 285-301.
15. Ehri, L. C., & Soffer, A. G. (1999). Graphophonemic awareness: Development in elementary students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 1-30.
16. Elliott, J., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the Dynamic Indicators of Early Literacy Skills-Modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33-49.
17. Foorman, B. R., Fletcher, J. M., Frances, D. J., Carlson, C. D., Chen, D., Mouszaki, A.,... Taylor, R. H. (1998). Technical Report: Texas Primary Reading Inventory (1998 ed.). Houston: Center for Academic and Reading Skills and University of Houston.
18. Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G. N. (2008). Making "secondary intervention" work in a tier-three Responsiveness-to-Intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413-436.
19. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsivenessto-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 216-227.
20. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N. J.,... O'Connor, R. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251-267.
21. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(4), 204-219.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103-111.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991). Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20, 49-66.
24. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-29.
25. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring basic skills progress. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
26. Furlong, M., & Karno, M. (1995). Review of Social Skills Rating System. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 967-969). Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
27. Gijsel, M. A., Bosman, A. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 558-571.
28. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257-288.
29. Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). Social Skills Rating System manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
31. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41-57.
32. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., Miles, J. N., Carroll, J. M., Hatcher, J., Gibbs, S.,... Snowling, M. J. (2006). Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 820-827.
33. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, § 601, Stat. 2647 (2004).
34. Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a Response to Intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582-600.
35. Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., Petschur, Y., & Catts, H. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments? Learning Disability Research & Practice, 24, 174-185.
36. Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203-210.
37. Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Towards a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
38. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
39. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
40. Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123-146.
41. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
42. McKenzie, R. (2009). Obscuring vital distinctions: The oversimplification of learning disabilities within RTI. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 32, 203-215.
43. McKinney, J. D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). The relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198-203.
44. McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
45. Miller, A. J. (2002). Subset selection in regression (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
46. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2011). Screening tools chart. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/chart/screeningTools/screeningtoolschart.html
47. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
48. Nelson, J. M. (2008). Beyond correlational analysis of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): A classification validity study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 542-552.
49. O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
50. Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816-833.
51. Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546-562.
52. Ritchey, K. D. (2002). The prediction of growth in reading subskills and the relationship of growth to literacy outcomes in kindergarten (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
53. Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 301-327.
54. Ryder, J. F., Tunmer, W. E., & Greaney, K. T. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 349-369.
55. Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75-107). Timonium, MD: York.
56. Shinn, M. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 6, 601-617.
57. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
58. Speece, D. L., DaDeppo, L., Hines, S., & Walker, C. (2005). [Graphophonemic fluency study]. Unpublished raw data.
59. Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 387-399.
60. Speece, D., Ritchey, K., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C., & Andrusik, K. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258-276.
61. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24-33.
62. Swets, J. A. (1986). Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 100-117.
63. Taylor, H., Anselmo, M., Foreman, A. L., Schatschneider, C., & Angelopoulos, J. (2000). Utility of kindergarten teacher judgments in identifying early learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 200-210.
64. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55-64.
65. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
66. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvin, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
67. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
68. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
69. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM.
70. Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (1989, 1990). WJ-R Tests of Achievement: Examiner's manual. In R. W. Woodcock & M. B. Johnson (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.