Predicting first-grade reading performance from kindergarten response to tier 1 instruction

Exceptional Children

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 453-470

  Al Otaiba, Stephanie ^a   Folsom, Jessica S ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^a   Wanzek, Jeanne ^a   Greulich, Luana ^a   Meadows, Jane ^a   Li, Zhi ^a   Connor, Carol M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864944869     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440291107700405     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316. doi: 10.1177/07419325020230050501
2. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414-431. doi: 10.1177/ 00222194060390050401
3. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C., Lane, H., Kosanovich, M., Schatschneider, C., Dyrlund, A. K., Miller, M. S., & Wright, T. L. (2008). Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students' early literacy growth. Journal of School Psycholog y, 46, 281-314. PMID 1908361 Medline.
4. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J. R., Kame'enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing, high-poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.004
5. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate-A new and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289-300.
6. Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., & Treadway, G. H. (2002). Open court reading. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
7. Bishop, A. G., & League, M. B. (2006). Identifying a multivariate screening model to predict reading difficulties at the onset of kindergarten: A longitudinal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 235-252. doi: 10.2307/30035552
8. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1
9. Cavanaugh, C. L., Kim, A., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Kindergarten reading interventions for at-risk students: Twenty years of research. Learning Disabilities, 2, 9-21.
10. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psycholog y, 98, 394-409. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663. 98.2.394
11. Connor, C. M., Piasta, S. B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., ⋯ & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development. Child Development, 80, 77-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01247.x
12. Coyne, M., Kame'enui, E., Simmons, D., & Harn, B. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90-106. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020101
13. Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (2002). Reading mastery plus. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
14. Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826. 2007.00237.x
15. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-Toinstruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-228. doi: 10.2307/1593674
16. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-Tier intervention in the primary grades (NCEE Publication No. 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
17. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/
18. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19. Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Graves, A. W. (2003). The English-language learner classroom observation instrument for beginning readers. In S. Vaughn & K. L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 111-144). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
20. Lonigan, C. J., Wagner, R., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (2007). Test of preschool early literacy. Austin, TX: ProEd.
21. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C., Fletcher, J., Anthony, J., Francis, D., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2
22. McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2002). Monitoring the academic progress of children who are unresponsive to generally effective early reading intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention Special Issue: Effective Assessment of Young Children, 27, 23-33. doi: 10.1177/073724770202700404
23. National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Center for Family Literacy.
24. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute of Health Pub.
25. Nelson, J. R., Benner, G. J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-Analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 255-267. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00080
26. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2008). HLM for Windows (Version 6.06) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
27. Schatschneider, C., Wagner, R. K., & Crawford, E. C. (2008). The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.005
28. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355.
29. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 387-399. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050201
31. Spira, E. G., Bracken, S. S., & Fischel, J. E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology, 41, 225-234. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.225
32. Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
33. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663. 91.4.579
34. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157-169. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390020401
35. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-Term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437-480. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
36. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processes. Austin, TX: ProEd.
37. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). WJ-III Tests of cognitive abilities and achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.