Stimulus-response bindings in priming

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 376-384

  Henson, Richard N ^a   Eckstein, Doris ^b   Waszak, Florian ^c,d   Frings, Christian ^e   Horner, Aidan J ^f,g  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^e Allgemeine Psychologie und Methodenlehre   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Masked priming; Negative priming; Repetition suppression; S R bindings; Subliminal priming

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATICITY; MASKED PRIMING; NEGATIVE PRIMING; REPETITION SUPPRESSION; S-R BINDINGS; SUBLIMINAL PRIMING;

BIOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FACILITATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; PRIMING; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANIMAL; BRAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REPETITION PRIMING;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BRAIN; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REPETITION PRIMING;

EID: 84903210066     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Roediger H.L., et al. Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: a processing account. Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving 1989, 67-84. Erlbaum. H.L. Roediger, F.I.M. Craik (Eds.).
2. Logan G.D. Repetition priming and automaticity: common underlying mechanisms?. Cogn. Psychol. 1990, 22:1-35.
3. Rothermund K., et al. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2005, 31:482-495.
4. Damian M.F. Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2001, 27:154-165.
5. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 2001, 54A:321-343.
6. Wühr P., Frings C. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2008, 137:116-130.
7. Marcel A.L. Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 1983, 15:197-237.
8. Eimer M., et al. Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. J. Mot. Behav. 2002, 34:3-10.
9. Eder A.B., et al. The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychol. Res. 2012, 76:111-118.
10. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 1997, 9:129-154.
11. Mayr S., et al. Evidence of vocal and manual event files in auditory negative priming. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 58:353-360.
12. Horner A.J., Henson R.N. Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2009, 35:757-779.
13. Dennis I., Perfect T.J. Do stimulus-action associations contribute to repetition priming?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2013, 39:85-95.
14. Koch I., Allport A. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Mem. Cognit. 2006, 34:433-444.
15. Race E.A., et al. Neural priming in human frontal cortex: multiple forms of learning reduce demands on the prefrontal executive system. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:1766-1781.
16. Race E.A., et al. Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1726-1738.
17. Waszak F., Hommel B. The costs and benefits of cross-task priming. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 35:1175-1186.
18. Wylie G., Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs". Psychol. Res. 2000, 63:212-233.
19. Denkinger B., Koutstaal W. Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: how abstract is repetition-related decision learning?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2009, 35:742-756.
20. Moutsopoulou K., Waszak F. Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38:367-374.
21. Moutsopoulou K., Waszak F. Durability of classification and action learning: differences revealed using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 2013, 226:373-382.
22. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:1229-1235.
23. Giesen C., Rothermund K. You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2013, 67:1-24.
24. Crump M.J.C., et al. Context-specific learning and control: the roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Conscious. Cogn. 2008, 17:22-36.
25. Vriezen E.R., et al. Priming effects in semantic classification tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 1995, 21:933-946.
26. Horner A.J., Henson R.N. Stimulus-response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation. Mem. Cognit. 2011, 39:1457-1471.
27. Schnyer D.M., et al. Item to decision mapping in rapid response learning. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 35:1472-1482.
28. Frings C., et al. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 75:700-709.
29. Perry J.R., Lupker S.J. An investigation of the time course of category congruence and priming distance effects in number classification tasks. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2012, 66:193-203.
30. Waszak F., et al. Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2004, 11:1027-1033.
31. Hommel B. Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Vis. Cogn. 1998, 5:183-216.
32. Quinn W.M., Kinoshita S. Congruence effect in semantic categorization with masked primes with narrow and broad categories. J. Mem. Lang. 2007, 58:286-306.
33. Abrams R.L., Greenwald A.G. Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconsious analysis of meaning. Psychol. Sci. 2000, 11:118-124.
34. Abrams R.L. Influence of category size and target set size on unconscious priming by novel words. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 55:189-194.
35. Pohl C., et al. Early and late selection in unconscious information processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:268-285.
36. Frings C., Rothermund K. To be or not to be. included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 2011, 37:1209-1227.
37. Dew I.T.Z., Giovanello K.S. The status of rapid response learning in aging. Psychol. Aging 2010, 25:898-910.
38. Waszak F., et al. Task switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cogn. Psychol. 2003, 46:361-433.
39. Kiesel A., et al. Unconscious priming according to multiple S-R rules. Cognition 2007, 104:89-105.
40. Waszak F., et al. Top-down versus bottom-up: when instructions overcome automatic retrieval. Psychol. Res. 2013, 77:611-617.
41. Allport A., et al. Shifting intentional set - exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance XV - Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing 1994, 421-452. MIT Press. C. Umilta, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
42. Lhermitte F. Utilization behavior and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983, 106:237-255.
43. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. Consciousness and Self-regulation 1986, 1-18. Plenum. R.J. Davidson (Ed.).
44. Brass M., et al. Neural correlates of overcoming interference from instructed and implemented stimulus-response associations. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:1766-1772.
45. Cohen-Kdoshay O., Meiran N. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 60:1140-1154.
46. Waszak F., et al. Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 2008, 127:30-35.
47. Ruge H., Wolfensteller U. Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1656-1667.
48. Cole M.W., et al. Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:14245-14254.
49. Wenke D., et al. Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71:92-106.
50. Frings C., et al. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 60:1367-1377.
51. Hommel B. How much attention does an event file need?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2005, 31:1067-1082.
52. Hommel B., Colzato L. Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Vis. Cogn. 2004, 11:483-521.
53. Hommel B. Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71:42-63.
54. Ihrke M., et al. Response-retrieval and negative priming encoding- and retrieval-specific effects. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 58:154-161.
55. Moeller B., Frings C. Attention meets binding: only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014, 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9.
56. Naccache L., et al. Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13:416-424.
57. Schubert T., et al. The time course of temporal attention effects on nonconscious prime processing. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 75:1667-1686.
58. Eckstein D., Henson R.N. Stimulus/response learning masked congruency priming of faces: evidence for covert mental categorisations?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2012, 65:92-120.
59. Van den Bussche E., et al. Masked primes can be genuinely semantically processed: a picture prime study. Exp. Psychol. 2009, 56:295-300.
60. Naccache L., Dehaene S. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition 2001, 80:223-237.
61. Finkbeiner M., Friedman J. The flexibility of nonconsciously deployed cognitive processes: evidence from masked congruence priming. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17095.
62. Lowe D. Long-term positive and negative identity priming: evidence for episodic retrieval. Mem. Cogn. 1998, 26:435-443.
63. Dobbins I.G., et al. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature 2004, 428:316-319.
64. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol. Rev. 1988, 95:492-527.
65. Giesen C., Rothermund K. Affective matching moderates S-R binding. Cogn. Emot. 2011, 25:342-350.
66. Waszak F., Pholulamdeth V. Episodic S-R bindings and emotion: about the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus-response associations. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 194:489-494.
67. Soldan A., et al. Priming and stimulus-response learning in perceptual classification tasks. Memory 2012, 20:400-413.
68. Mayr S., Buchner A. Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:932-943.
69. Wiswede D., et al. Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor-based response retrieval. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 38:3496-3506.
70. Frings C., et al. Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks. Psychol. Res. 2014, 10.1007/s00426-013-0527-3.
71. Giesen C., et al. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Mem. Cognit. 2012, 40:373-387.
72. Hydock C., et al. Distinct response components indicate that binding is the primary cause of response repetition effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2013, 39:1598-1611.
73. Van den Bussche E., et al. Mechanisms of masked priming: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2009, 135:452-477.
74. Logan G.D. An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 109:376-400.
75. Kunde W., et al. Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition 2003, 88:223-242.
76. Neumann O. Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychol. Res. 1990, 52:207-215.
77. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:263-270.
78. Dehaene S., et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:752-758.
79. Horner A.J., Henson R.N. Priming, response learning and repetition suppression. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1979-1991.
80. Horner A.J., Henson R.N. Incongruent abstract stimulus-response bindings result in response interference: fMRI and EEG evidence from visual object classification priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:760-773.
81. Gotts S.J., et al. Repetition priming and repetition suppression: a case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 3:250-259.
82. Ghuman A.S., et al. The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:8405-8409.
83. Hsu Y.F., Waszak F. Stimulus-classification traces are dominant in response learning. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2012, 86:262-268.
84. Wig G.S., et al. Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1228-1233.
85. Squire L.R., et al. The structure and organization of memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1993, 44:453-495.
86. Schnyer D.M., et al. Rapid response learning in amnesia: delineating associative learning components in repetition priming. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:140-149.
87. Wise S.P., Murray E.A. Role of the hippocampal system in conditional motor learning: mapping antecedents to action. Hippocampus 1999, 9:101-117.
88. Ashby F.G., et al. A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114:632-656.
89. Saggar M., et al. Behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational evidence for perceptual caching in repetition priming. Brain Res. 2010, 1315:75-91.