The structure of affective action representations: Temporal binding of affective response codes

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 111-118

  Eder, Andreas B ^a   Müsseler, Jochen ^b   Hommel, Bernhard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

AFFECT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84855309100     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0327-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bamford, S., & Ward, R. (2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion, 8, 174-183.
2. Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166-173.
3. Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276-298.
4. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224.
5. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
6. De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 45-61.
7. Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). Common valence coding in action and evaluation: Affective blindness towards response-compatible stimuli. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1297-1322.
8. Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218-235.
9. Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262-281.
10. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
11. Haussmann, R. E. (1992). Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 303-310.
12. Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509-523.
13. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
14. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
15. Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810-828.
16. Laird, J. D., & Strout, S. (2007). Emotional behaviors as emotional stimuli. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 54-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
18. Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1270-1296.
19. Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6-10.
20. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
21. Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371-391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Schwibbe, M., Röder, K., Schwibbe, G., Borchardt, M., & Geiken-Pophanken, G. (1981). Zum emotionalen Gehalt von Substantiven, Adjektiven und Verben [The emotional contents of nouns, adjectives and verbs]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 486-501.
23. Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713-720.
24. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
25. Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239-245.
26. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
27. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1298-1306.