Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 373-387

  Giesen, Carina ^a   Frings, Christian ^b   Rothermund, Klaus ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Episodic retrieval; Event files; Inhibition; Repetition priming; Selective attention; Stimulus response binding

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864451154     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603-623.
2. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742-748.
3. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ariga, A., & Kawahara, J. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4, 891-903.
5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 108. 3. 624.
6. De Houwer, J., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Stimulus-feature specific negative priming. Memory & Cognition, 29, 931-939.
7. Denkinger, B., & Koutstaal, W. (2009). Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: How abstract is repetition-related decision learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 742-756.
8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi: 10. 3758/BF03203267.
9. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193146.
10. Fletcher, B. C., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 417-427.
11. Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 565-574.
12. Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be . . . included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in S-R episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1209-1227.
13. Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1367-1377.
14. Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2006). Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 683-693.
15. Frings, C., & Wühr, P. (2007). On distractor repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm. Visual Cognition, 15, 166-178.
16. Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 149-164.
17. Gibbons, H., & Frings, C. (2010). Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 75, 339-348.
18. Gibbons, H., & Stahl, J. (2008). Early activity in the lateralized readiness potential suggests prime-response retrieval as a source of negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 164-172.
19. Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). Affective matching moderates S-R binding. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 342-350.
20. Grison, S., & Strayer, D. L. (2001). Negative priming and perceptual fluency: More than what meets the eye. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1063-1071. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194524.
21. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. doi: 10. 1080/713756773.
22. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 08. 007.
23. Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1067-1082.
24. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521.
25. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119-164.
27. Lamy, D., Antebi, C., Aviani, N., & Carmel, T. (2008). Priming of pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Vision Research, 48, 30-41.
28. Levinthal, B. R., & Lleras, A. (2008). Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-15.
29. Loach, D., Botella, J., Privado, J., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2008). Priming and intrusion errors in RSVP streams with two response dimensions. Psychological Research, 72, 281-288.
30. Loach, D., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism? Visual Cognition, 10, 513-526.
31. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 95. 4. 492.
32. Lorch, E. P., Anderson, D. R., & Well, A. D. (1984). Effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification tasks: Interference is reduced by habituation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 850-864.
33. MacDonald, P. A., & Joordens, S. (2000). Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1478-1496.
34. Mackintosh, B., Mathews, A., & Holden, E. (2002). Bigger than a breadbox? Attention to distractors may not enhance negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1323-1329.
35. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
36. Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 932-943. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 32. 4. 932.
37. Mayr, S., Buchner, A., & Dentale, S. (2009). Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 408-423. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 35. 2. 408.
38. Mayr, S., Hauke, R., Buchner, A., & Niedeggen, M. (2008). No evidence for a cue mismatch in negative priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 645-652. doi: 10. 1080/17470210802483487.
39. Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
40. Möller, B., Rothermund, K., & Frings, C. (2011). Integrating the irrelevant sound-Grouping modulates the integration of auditory distractors into event files. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
42. Neill, W. T. (2007). Mechanisms of transfer-inappropriate processing. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 63-78). Washisngton, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
44. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361-394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Neumann, E., & DeSchepper, B. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1136-1145.
46. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613-623.
47. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. C. (1991). Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
48. Pösse, B., Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2006). Do stimulus-response bindings survive a task switch? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 640-651.
49. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 482-495. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 31. 3. 482.
50. Stablum, F., Ricci, R., Pavese, A., & Umiltà, C. (2001). Global/local processing and negative priming: The influence of selection difficulty and stimulus exposure. Psychological Research, 65, 81-97.
51. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571-590.
52. Tipper, S. P. (1992). Selection for action: The role of inhibitory mechanisms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 105-109.
53. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 321-343.
54. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 591-611.
55. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
56. Treisman, A. (1999). Feature binding, attention and object perception. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 91-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58. Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2005). When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets? Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 897-909.
59. Yashar, A., & Lamy, D. (2010). Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: Common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search. Psychological Science, 21, 243-251. doi: 10. 1177/0956797609357928.