Crosstalk between ubiquitin and other post-translational modifications on chromatin during double-strand break repair

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 426-434

  Zhao, Yu ^a   Brickner, Joshua R ^a   Majid, Mona C ^a   Mosammaparast, Nima ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatin; DNA damage; Signaling; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; BINDING PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HISTONE; TUMOR PROTEIN P53 BINDING PROTEIN 1; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN;

ACETYLATION; ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLATION; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; HISTONE METHYLATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN METHYLATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMOYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UBIQUITINATION; ANIMAL; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 84903124095     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.01.005     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Luger K., et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997, 389:251-260.
2. Gardner K.E., et al. Operating on chromatin, a colorful language where context matters. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 409:36-46.
3. Sirbu B.M., Cortez D. DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a012724.
4. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
5. Celeste A., et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 2002, 296:922-927.
6. Reinhardt H.C., Yaffe M.B. Phospho-Ser/Thr-binding domains: navigating the cell cycle and DNA damage response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:563-580.
7. Huen M.S., et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 2007, 131:901-914.
8. Mailand N., et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 2007, 131:887-900.
9. Kolas N.K., et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 2007, 318:1637-1640.
10. Mattiroli F., et al. RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling. Cell 2012, 150:1182-1195.
11. Gatti M., et al. A novel ubiquitin mark at the N-terminal tail of histone H2As targeted by RNF168 ubiquitin ligase. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:2538-2544.
12. Doil C., et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 2009, 136:435-446.
13. Stewart G.S., et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 2009, 136:420-434.
14. Huen M.S., et al. BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:138-148.
15. Zimmermann M., de Lange T. 53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24:108-117.
16. Jentsch S., Psakhye I. Control of nuclear activities by substrate-selective and protein-group SUMOylation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47:167-186.
17. Sriramachandran A.M., Dohmen R.J. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1843:75-85.
18. Zhao X., Blobel G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:4777-4782.
19. Mabb A.M., et al. PIASy mediates NEMO sumoylation and NF-kappaB activation in response to genotoxic stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:986-993.
20. Galanty Y., et al. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2009, 462:935-939.
21. Morris J.R., et al. The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 2009, 462:886-890.
22. Danielsen J.R., et al. DNA damage-inducible SUMOylation of HERC2 promotes RNF8 binding via a novel SUMO-binding Zinc finger. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:179-187.
23. Bekker-Jensen S., et al. HERC2 coordinates ubiquitin-dependent assembly of DNA repair factors on damaged chromosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:80-86. sup pp 81-12.
24. Oestergaard V.H., et al. RNF8 and RNF168 but not HERC2 are required for DNA damage-induced ubiquitylation in chicken DT40 cells. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2012, 11:892-905.
25. Guzzo C.M., et al. RNF4-dependent hybrid SUMO-ubiquitin chains are signals for RAP80 and thereby mediate the recruitment of BRCA1 to sites of DNA damage. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5:ra88.
26. Yin Y., et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1196-1208.
27. Galanty Y., et al. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1179-1195.
28. Luo K., et al. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J. 2012, 31:3008-3019.
29. Poulsen S.L., et al. RNF111/Arkadia is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase that facilitates the DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:797-807.
30. Shahbazian M.D., Grunstein M. Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76:75-100.
31. Ikura T., et al. Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 2000, 102:463-473.
32. Xu Y., et al. The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:31-43.
33. Ikura T., et al. DNA damage-dependent acetylation and ubiquitination of H2AX enhances chromatin dynamics. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:7028-7040.
34. Kaidi A., Jackson S.P. KAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation couples chromatin sensing to ATM signalling. Nature 2013, 498:70-74.
35. Sun Y., et al. Tip60: connecting chromatin to DNA damage signaling. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:930-936.
36. Shogren-Knaak M., et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 2006, 311:844-847.
37. Murr R., et al. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:91-99.
38. Chen W.T., et al. Systematic identification of functional residues in mammalian histone H2AX. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33:111-126.
39. Euskirchen G., et al. SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling factors: multiscale analyses and diverse functions. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:30897-30905.
40. Sun Y., et al. DNA damage-induced acetylation of lysine 3016 of ATM activates ATM kinase activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:8502-8509.
41. Sun Y., et al. Histone H3 methylation links DNA damage detection to activation of the tumour suppressor Tip60. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1376-1382.
42. Wu J., et al. Chfr and RNF8 synergistically regulate ATM activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:761-768.
43. Lee J.H., et al. 53BP1 promotes ATM activity through direct interactions with the MRN complex. EMBO J. 2010, 29:574-585.
44. Sanders S.L., et al. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 2004, 119:603-614.
45. Botuyan M.V., et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 2006, 127:1361-1373.
46. Pei H., et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature 2011, 470:124-128.
47. Hartlerode A.J., et al. Impact of histone H4 lysine 20 methylation on 53BP1 responses to chromosomal double strand breaks. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49211.
48. van Attikum H., Gasser S.M. Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:207-217.
49. Fradet-Turcotte A., et al. 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 2013, 499:50-54.
50. Bunting S.F., et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010, 141:243-254.
51. Yan Q., et al. BBAP monoubiquitylates histone H4 at lysine 91 and selectively modulates the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:110-120.
52. Yan Q., et al. BAL1 and its partner E3 ligase, BBAP, link poly(ADP-ribose) activation, ubiquitylation, and double-strand DNA repair independent of ATM, MDC1, and RNF8. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33:845-857.
53. Mosammaparast N., et al. The histone demethylase LSD1/KDM1A promotes the DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 203:457-470.
54. Kalisch T., et al. New readers and interpretations of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:381-390.
55. Chou D.M., et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:18475-18480.
56. Polo S.E., et al. Regulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4. EMBO J. 2010, 29:3130-3139.
57. Smeenk G., et al. The NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex regulates signaling and repair of DNA damage. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:741-749.
58. Allen H.F., et al. The NuRD architecture. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70:3513-3524.
59. Luijsterburg M.S., et al. A new non-catalytic role for ubiquitin ligase RNF8 in unfolding higher-order chromatin structure. EMBO J. 2012, 31:2511-2527.
60. Li M., et al. The FHA and BRCT domains recognize ADP-ribosylation during DNA damage response. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1752-1768.
61. Li M., Yu X. Function of BRCA1 in the DNA damage response is mediated by ADP-ribosylation. Cancer Cell 2013, 23:693-704.
62. Zhu Q., et al. BRCA1 tumour suppression occurs via heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Nature 2011, 477:179-184.
63. Ma T., et al. RNF111-dependent neddylation activates DNA damage-induced ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 2013, 49:897-907.
64. Cheung V.G., et al. Genetic control of hotspots. Science 2010, 327:791-792.
65. Sobhian B., et al. RAP80 targets BRCA1 to specific ubiquitin structures at DNA damage sites. Science 2007, 316:1198-1202.
66. Sato Y., et al. Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63-linked polyubiquitin chains by tandem UIMs of RAP80. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2461-2468.
67. Wang B., et al. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science 2007, 316:1194-1198.
68. Sims J.J., Cohen R.E. Linkage-specific avidity defines the lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin-binding preference of rap80. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:775-783.
69. Panier S., et al. Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:383-395.
70. Manke I.A., et al. BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting. Science 2003, 302:636-639.
71. Stucki M., et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-stranded breaks. Cell 2005, 123:1213-1226.
72. Yu X., et al. The BRCT domain is a phospho-protein binding domain. Science 2003, 302:639-642.
73. Blus B.J., et al. Epigenetic virtues of chromodomains. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 46:507-526.